Effect of respiratory muscle stretch gymnastics on chest expansion and peak expiratory flow rate among sawmill workers

IF 0.2 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
E. Shanmugananth, E. Chandramouli, S. Nambi, S. Parthasarathy
{"title":"Effect of respiratory muscle stretch gymnastics on chest expansion and peak expiratory flow rate among sawmill workers","authors":"E. Shanmugananth, E. Chandramouli, S. Nambi, S. Parthasarathy","doi":"10.4103/ajprhc.ajprhc_70_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Sawmill workers are subjected to high levels of wood dust, which can significantly impair lung function. Many studies have found restrictive abnormalities associated with decreased breathing muscle strength and chest expansion. Respiratory muscle stretch gymnastics (RMSG) has been proposed as an additional form of rehabilitation for patients suffering from respiratory diseases. RMSG is intended to reduce chest wall stiffness, particularly in the respiratory muscles of the chest wall. Objective: The objective of this study was to look into the impact of RMSG on chest expansion and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) in sawmill workers. Methodology: Fifty randomly selected sawmill workers aged 30–50 years in Chidambaram town were given RMSG training twice daily, four times each of five patterns for 4 weeks. A structured questionnaire was used to interview the subjects. Height, weight, and chest measurements were all part of the physical examination. Before and after training, the physiological parameter PEFR was measured. The extent of chest expansion was the primary outcome measure. Data Analysis and Outcomes: The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16 was used to evaluate and analyze the data, with the level of significance set at P < 0.05. The dependent t-test revealed a significant difference in chest expansion between pre- and posttraining (2.441.11) and (3.780.616) with a P = 0.001. At P = 0.001, there was also a statistically significant difference in the mean values of PEFR (341.80 77.13) and (479.8058.24). Conclusion: The study found that RMSG training improves chest expansion and pulmonary function (PEFR). According to the findings, RMSG is a simple, safe, and effective technique for increasing the overall functional capacity of sawmill workers. Our study clearly demarcates the difference in an angle that 40° or 45° recumbency is useful. With not much literature in such workers, we can say that this study is one of the early works in this field.","PeriodicalId":8534,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajprhc.ajprhc_70_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Sawmill workers are subjected to high levels of wood dust, which can significantly impair lung function. Many studies have found restrictive abnormalities associated with decreased breathing muscle strength and chest expansion. Respiratory muscle stretch gymnastics (RMSG) has been proposed as an additional form of rehabilitation for patients suffering from respiratory diseases. RMSG is intended to reduce chest wall stiffness, particularly in the respiratory muscles of the chest wall. Objective: The objective of this study was to look into the impact of RMSG on chest expansion and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) in sawmill workers. Methodology: Fifty randomly selected sawmill workers aged 30–50 years in Chidambaram town were given RMSG training twice daily, four times each of five patterns for 4 weeks. A structured questionnaire was used to interview the subjects. Height, weight, and chest measurements were all part of the physical examination. Before and after training, the physiological parameter PEFR was measured. The extent of chest expansion was the primary outcome measure. Data Analysis and Outcomes: The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16 was used to evaluate and analyze the data, with the level of significance set at P < 0.05. The dependent t-test revealed a significant difference in chest expansion between pre- and posttraining (2.441.11) and (3.780.616) with a P = 0.001. At P = 0.001, there was also a statistically significant difference in the mean values of PEFR (341.80 77.13) and (479.8058.24). Conclusion: The study found that RMSG training improves chest expansion and pulmonary function (PEFR). According to the findings, RMSG is a simple, safe, and effective technique for increasing the overall functional capacity of sawmill workers. Our study clearly demarcates the difference in an angle that 40° or 45° recumbency is useful. With not much literature in such workers, we can say that this study is one of the early works in this field.
呼吸肌拉伸体操对锯木厂工人胸扩张及呼气峰值流速的影响
导言:锯木厂的工人受到高水平的木尘,这可以严重损害肺功能。许多研究发现限制性异常与呼吸肌肉力量和胸部扩张减少有关。呼吸肌伸展体操(RMSG)已被提出作为一种额外形式的康复患者患有呼吸系统疾病。RMSG旨在减少胸壁僵硬,特别是胸壁的呼吸肌。目的:本研究的目的是探讨RMSG对锯木厂工人胸扩张和呼气峰流速(PEFR)的影响。方法:在Chidambaram镇随机选择50名年龄在30-50岁的锯木厂工人进行RMSG培训,每天两次,五种模式中每模式四次,为期四周。采用结构化问卷对研究对象进行访谈。身高、体重和胸围都是体检的一部分。训练前后测量生理参数PEFR。胸部扩张的程度是主要的结局指标。数据分析和结果:采用SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences)第16版对数据进行评价和分析,显著性水平为P < 0.05。经相关t检验,训练前后胸围扩张量分别为2.441.11和3.780.616,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.001)。PEFR均值(341.80 77.13)和(479.8058.24)差异有统计学意义(P = 0.001)。结论:研究发现RMSG训练可改善胸扩张和肺功能(PEFR)。根据研究结果,RMSG是一种简单、安全、有效的技术,可以提高锯木厂工人的整体功能能力。我们的研究清楚地区分了40°或45°平躺的角度的不同。由于关于这类工作者的文献不多,我们可以说这项研究是这一领域的早期工作之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信