Will FinTech make regional banks superfluous for small firm finance? Observations from soft information‐based lending in Germany

Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.1111/ecno.12159
Franz Flögel, Marius Beckamp
{"title":"Will FinTech make regional banks superfluous for small firm finance? Observations from soft information‐based lending in Germany","authors":"Franz Flögel, Marius Beckamp","doi":"10.1111/ecno.12159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regional banks have a competitive advantage in that short distances to clients enable the use of soft information for superior lending decisions. If the ambition of FinTech start‐ups to create superior screening and monitoring technologies materialises, this advantage would be diminished and regional banks would become superfluous for small firm finance. To explore this claim, the paper in hand analyses qualitative empirical data about the lending processes and rating system use of regional German savings banks. In essence, the results from participant observation and interviews clarify the importance of “real” soft information for critical lending decisions. The context specificity and limited verifiability of “real” soft information hamper it from being hardened through the use of rating systems and other bank‐ICT. Though FinTech's scoring technologies may overcome the first limitation, it appears likely that in the course of scoring development “real” soft information will be systematically crowded out due to the manipulation problem. The paper expects improved access to finance for SMEs if FinTech solutions overcome both limitations of “real” soft information use, or if peer‐to‐peer lending and regional banks coexist. Deteriorated access to finance is expected if FinTech companies displace the relationship banking of regional banks due to enhanced competition, without preserving the advantages of “real” soft information with superior screening and monitoring technologies. The paper concludes with recommendations on how to prevent deteriorated access to finance for small firms by promoting fair competition and FinTech innovations.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ecno.12159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Regional banks have a competitive advantage in that short distances to clients enable the use of soft information for superior lending decisions. If the ambition of FinTech start‐ups to create superior screening and monitoring technologies materialises, this advantage would be diminished and regional banks would become superfluous for small firm finance. To explore this claim, the paper in hand analyses qualitative empirical data about the lending processes and rating system use of regional German savings banks. In essence, the results from participant observation and interviews clarify the importance of “real” soft information for critical lending decisions. The context specificity and limited verifiability of “real” soft information hamper it from being hardened through the use of rating systems and other bank‐ICT. Though FinTech's scoring technologies may overcome the first limitation, it appears likely that in the course of scoring development “real” soft information will be systematically crowded out due to the manipulation problem. The paper expects improved access to finance for SMEs if FinTech solutions overcome both limitations of “real” soft information use, or if peer‐to‐peer lending and regional banks coexist. Deteriorated access to finance is expected if FinTech companies displace the relationship banking of regional banks due to enhanced competition, without preserving the advantages of “real” soft information with superior screening and monitoring technologies. The paper concludes with recommendations on how to prevent deteriorated access to finance for small firms by promoting fair competition and FinTech innovations.
分享
查看原文
金融科技会使地区性银行成为小企业融资的多余之物吗?来自德国软信息借贷的观察
地区性银行具有竞争优势,因为它们与客户的距离较短,因此能够利用软信息做出更好的贷款决策。如果金融科技初创公司创造卓越的筛选和监控技术的雄心成为现实,这种优势将被削弱,地区性银行将成为小企业融资的多余资源。为了探讨这一主张,本文分析了有关德国地区储蓄银行贷款过程和评级系统使用的定性实证数据。从本质上讲,参与者观察和访谈的结果阐明了“真实”软信息对关键贷款决策的重要性。“真实”软信息的上下文特殊性和有限的可验证性阻碍了它通过使用评级系统和其他银行信息通信技术而得到强化。尽管FinTech的评分技术可能会克服第一个限制,但在评分发展的过程中,由于操纵问题,“真正的”软信息很可能会被系统性地排挤出去。本文预计,如果金融科技解决方案克服了“真正的”软信息使用的限制,或者如果点对点贷款和区域银行共存,中小企业获得融资的机会将得到改善。如果金融科技公司由于竞争加剧而取代了地区银行的关系银行业务,而没有保留“真实”软信息的优势和卓越的筛选和监控技术,预计融资渠道将会恶化。本文最后就如何通过促进公平竞争和金融科技创新来防止小企业融资渠道恶化提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信