Risk Factors to Persistent Dysentery among Children under the Age of Five in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa; the Case of Kumi, Eastern Uganda

P. Kirabira, D. Okeyo, J. Ssempebwa
{"title":"Risk Factors to Persistent Dysentery among Children under the Age of Five in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa; the Case of Kumi, Eastern Uganda","authors":"P. Kirabira, D. Okeyo, J. Ssempebwa","doi":"10.33425/2641-4295.1003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Dysentery, otherwise called bloody diarrhoea, is a problem of Public Health importance globally, contributing 54% of the cases of childhood diarrhoeal diseases in Kumi district, Uganda. We set out to assess the risk factors associated with the persistently high prevalence of childhood dysentery in Kumi district. Methods: We conducted an analytical matched case-control study, with the under five child as the study unit. We collected quantitative data from the mothers or caretakers of the under five children using semi-structured questionnaires and checklists and qualitative data using Key informer interview guides. Quantitative data was analysed using SPSS while qualitative data was analysed manually. Results: Under fives living in a household of more than 5 people had a 19.2 times higher risk of developing dysentery (OR 19.2, CI 4.4–90.1), and children from households with boiled their drinking water were less than 1% less likely to develop dysentery (OR <0.001, CI 0.1–0.5). There was neither difference between households that used piped water and the development of dysentery (OR 1.1, CI 0.1–8.2), nor households which had another child that had ever had dysentery in the household and having dysentery (OR 3.2, CI 0.3–40.4). Major dysentery risk factors were over-crowding and big family sizes but these were still un-known to the majority of the people, yet people tended to avoid safe water sources like piped water and protected wells or springs due to long distances, high piped water connecting costs and high water bills. Conclusion: Whereas most mothers were knowledgeable of the causes and prevention of dysentery, they did not actually practice what they knew. Sustained campaigns on dysentery prevention and control by the government and other stakeholders are needed. Research Article Citation: Peter Kirabira, David Omondi Okeyo, John C Ssempebwa. Risk Factors to Persistent Dysentery among Children under the Age of Five in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa; the Case of Kumi, Eastern Uganda. Food Sci Nutr Res. 2018; 1(1): 1-6.","PeriodicalId":12378,"journal":{"name":"Food Science & Nutrition Research","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science & Nutrition Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2641-4295.1003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Dysentery, otherwise called bloody diarrhoea, is a problem of Public Health importance globally, contributing 54% of the cases of childhood diarrhoeal diseases in Kumi district, Uganda. We set out to assess the risk factors associated with the persistently high prevalence of childhood dysentery in Kumi district. Methods: We conducted an analytical matched case-control study, with the under five child as the study unit. We collected quantitative data from the mothers or caretakers of the under five children using semi-structured questionnaires and checklists and qualitative data using Key informer interview guides. Quantitative data was analysed using SPSS while qualitative data was analysed manually. Results: Under fives living in a household of more than 5 people had a 19.2 times higher risk of developing dysentery (OR 19.2, CI 4.4–90.1), and children from households with boiled their drinking water were less than 1% less likely to develop dysentery (OR <0.001, CI 0.1–0.5). There was neither difference between households that used piped water and the development of dysentery (OR 1.1, CI 0.1–8.2), nor households which had another child that had ever had dysentery in the household and having dysentery (OR 3.2, CI 0.3–40.4). Major dysentery risk factors were over-crowding and big family sizes but these were still un-known to the majority of the people, yet people tended to avoid safe water sources like piped water and protected wells or springs due to long distances, high piped water connecting costs and high water bills. Conclusion: Whereas most mothers were knowledgeable of the causes and prevention of dysentery, they did not actually practice what they knew. Sustained campaigns on dysentery prevention and control by the government and other stakeholders are needed. Research Article Citation: Peter Kirabira, David Omondi Okeyo, John C Ssempebwa. Risk Factors to Persistent Dysentery among Children under the Age of Five in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa; the Case of Kumi, Eastern Uganda. Food Sci Nutr Res. 2018; 1(1): 1-6.
撒哈拉以南非洲农村地区5岁以下儿童持续性痢疾的危险因素乌干达东部库米的案例
痢疾,又称血性腹泻,是全球公共卫生的一个重要问题,占乌干达Kumi地区儿童腹泻病病例的54%。我们着手评估与Kumi地区儿童痢疾持续高发相关的危险因素。方法:以5岁以下儿童为研究单位,进行分析匹配病例-对照研究。我们使用半结构化问卷和检查表从五岁以下儿童的母亲或监护人那里收集定量数据,并使用关键举报人访谈指南收集定性数据。定量数据采用SPSS软件分析,定性数据采用手工分析。结果:生活在5人以上家庭中的5岁以下儿童患痢疾的风险高出19.2倍(OR 19.2, CI 4.4-90.1),而来自饮用水煮沸家庭的儿童患痢疾的可能性低于1% (OR <0.001, CI 0.1-0.5)。使用自来水的家庭与患痢疾的家庭之间没有差异(OR 1.1, CI 0.1-8.2),家中有另一个孩子患痢疾的家庭之间也没有差异(OR 3.2, CI 0.3-40.4)。主要的痢疾风险因素是过度拥挤和家庭规模大,但大多数人仍然不知道这些,但由于距离远,管道水连接成本高,水费高,人们倾向于避免使用安全的水源,如管道水和受保护的水井或泉水。结论:虽然大多数母亲了解痢疾的原因和预防措施,但她们实际上并没有实践她们所知道的。需要政府和其他利益攸关方持续开展预防和控制痢疾的运动。研究论文来源:Peter Kirabira, David Omondi Okeyo, John C Ssempebwa。撒哈拉以南非洲农村地区5岁以下儿童持续性痢疾的危险因素乌干达东部库米的案例。食品科学与营养杂志2018;1(1): 1 - 6。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信