Assessing students' knowledge of subdisciplines in Anatomy

A. Ebeye, J. Oyem, Vincent N Onwochei-Bolum
{"title":"Assessing students' knowledge of subdisciplines in Anatomy","authors":"A. Ebeye, J. Oyem, Vincent N Onwochei-Bolum","doi":"10.4103/JECA.JECA_29_16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT: In recent times, the knowledge of anatomy has been broadened to a wide range of subdisciplines such as forensic science, sports medicine, and medical genetics. Despite these recent trends, anatomy undergraduates are faced with challenges of areas of specialization and limited or no job placement for a degree in anatomy. AIM: This study was therefore aimed at assessing the students' knowledge of subdisciplines in Anatomy. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This study was a cross-sectional survey study that involved the use of questionnaires and was carried out in Delta State University Abraka and University of Benin, Benin City. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two-hundred and ninety-seven semistructured, close-ended questionnaires were administered to Delta State University Abraka and University of Benin undergraduates, from whom due consents have been obtained to fill. Respondents' sociodemographic factors, university levels, and awareness of the various subspecialties in Anatomy were recorded. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The results obtained are presented in simple percentages and frequencies, with illustrations represented in tables and figures. RESULTS: The study recorded the highest percentage in Histochemistry and Histology which accounted for 14.06%. This was followed by Clinical Embryology, Cellular and Molecular Biology, Mortuary Science, and Neuroscience which constituted 13.71%, 12.49%, 11.73%, and 11.38%, respectively. Lower percentages were recorded in Comparative Anatomy (8.80%), Biometrics and Forensic Biology (9.00%), and Clinical Genetics (9.81%). It further showed the lowest percentages in Sports Science and Bioanthropology which constituted 3.74% and 5.20%, respectively. The findings from this study also showed no differences between males and females as to who is more interested in Anatomy. Furthermore, results from the mode of admission showed that a higher percentage of students were admitted by chance (56.6%) than by choice (43.4%). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that students have an adequate knowledge of subdisciplines introduced during their course of study but lacked adequate knowledge in some major career prospects in Anatomy.","PeriodicalId":15815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental and Clinical Anatomy","volume":"19 1","pages":"83 - 86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental and Clinical Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JECA.JECA_29_16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

CONTEXT: In recent times, the knowledge of anatomy has been broadened to a wide range of subdisciplines such as forensic science, sports medicine, and medical genetics. Despite these recent trends, anatomy undergraduates are faced with challenges of areas of specialization and limited or no job placement for a degree in anatomy. AIM: This study was therefore aimed at assessing the students' knowledge of subdisciplines in Anatomy. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This study was a cross-sectional survey study that involved the use of questionnaires and was carried out in Delta State University Abraka and University of Benin, Benin City. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two-hundred and ninety-seven semistructured, close-ended questionnaires were administered to Delta State University Abraka and University of Benin undergraduates, from whom due consents have been obtained to fill. Respondents' sociodemographic factors, university levels, and awareness of the various subspecialties in Anatomy were recorded. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The results obtained are presented in simple percentages and frequencies, with illustrations represented in tables and figures. RESULTS: The study recorded the highest percentage in Histochemistry and Histology which accounted for 14.06%. This was followed by Clinical Embryology, Cellular and Molecular Biology, Mortuary Science, and Neuroscience which constituted 13.71%, 12.49%, 11.73%, and 11.38%, respectively. Lower percentages were recorded in Comparative Anatomy (8.80%), Biometrics and Forensic Biology (9.00%), and Clinical Genetics (9.81%). It further showed the lowest percentages in Sports Science and Bioanthropology which constituted 3.74% and 5.20%, respectively. The findings from this study also showed no differences between males and females as to who is more interested in Anatomy. Furthermore, results from the mode of admission showed that a higher percentage of students were admitted by chance (56.6%) than by choice (43.4%). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that students have an adequate knowledge of subdisciplines introduced during their course of study but lacked adequate knowledge in some major career prospects in Anatomy.
评估学生对解剖学分支学科的知识
背景:近年来,解剖学的知识已经扩展到广泛的分支学科,如法医学、运动医学和医学遗传学。尽管有这些最近的趋势,解剖学本科生面临着专业领域的挑战,以及解剖学学位的就业机会有限或根本没有。目的:本研究旨在评估学生对解剖学分支学科的知识。背景和设计:本研究是一项横断面调查研究,采用问卷调查的方式,在阿布巴卡三角洲州立大学和贝宁市的贝宁大学进行。材料和方法:向三角洲州立大学阿布拉卡分校和贝宁大学的本科生发放了297份半结构化封闭式问卷,并征得他们的同意填写问卷。调查对象的社会人口学因素、大学水平和对解剖学各个亚专业的认识被记录下来。统计分析:所得结果以简单的百分比和频率表示,并以表格和图形表示。结果:本研究中组织化学和组织学所占比例最高,为14.06%。其次是临床胚胎学、细胞与分子生物学、太平间科学和神经科学,分别占13.71%、12.49%、11.73%和11.38%。比较解剖学(8.80%)、生物识别和法医生物学(9.00%)和临床遗传学(9.81%)的比例较低。体育科学和生物人类学的学生比例最低,分别为3.74%和5.20%。这项研究的结果还表明,男性和女性在谁对解剖学更感兴趣方面没有差异。此外,录取方式的结果显示,随机录取的学生比例(56.6%)高于选择录取的学生比例(43.4%)。结论:本研究表明,学生对学习过程中引入的分支学科有足够的了解,但对解剖学的一些主要职业前景缺乏足够的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信