Personality Characteristics and Emotional Intelligence Levels of Millenials: A Study in Turkish Context

Q3 Social Sciences
Guven Ordun, Asli Akun
{"title":"Personality Characteristics and Emotional Intelligence Levels of Millenials: A Study in Turkish Context","authors":"Guven Ordun, Asli Akun","doi":"10.14706/JECOSS16614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionEmotions can be explained by psysiological changes in the body, cognitions, learning processes, personality, social relations, experiences, psychological conditions, cultural practices, and are grounded in daily life (Strongman, 2003). Emotional intelligence is described as monitoring and evaluating one's own emotions, monitoring and evaluating emotions of others, regulating and using them (Hartel, et al. 2005). Whereas, cognitive intelligence is associated with the factual information about people, things, events, time, and place, emotional intelligence deals with the antecedents and mutual relations between these aspects of life (Terrell & Hughes, 2008). Personality can be defined as distinctive and stable ways of behavior (Ewen, 2010). Emotions and personality are known to be intertwined with each other. Some researches in the field (e.g. Caruso et al., 2002; Ghiabi & Besharat, 2011) have revealed that, there are significant relations between personality dimensions and emotional intelligence dimensions. This study aims to search this relation on millenials. Twenge (2009) discussed that the generation a person belongs to, can be slightly more influence on the person than his/her family. She added that it is essential to recognize the own realities of each and every generation within various contexts (Twenge, 2009). Millenials in Istanbul, Turkey are subjects of this research. However; the findings may be relevant in other cultures's generations within the limitations of specific historical, social, and economic conditions.Theoretical BackgroundAssesment of PersonalityPersonality has been studied thoroughly throughout the years and researchers have stated theories about personality. The psychodynamic perspective explains the effect of the unconscious, below the surface on the structure and development of personality, whereas the humanistic perspective underlines the positive human nature and self-actualizing capability on the structure and development of personality. The trait approach emphasizes the effect of conscious, above the surface and behavior patterns on the structure and development of personality, whereas the behaviorist theory focuses on the effect of environment and learning in shaping personality. Cognitive approach emphasizes the effect of mental processes on the structure and development of personality (Ewen, 2010). Although these approaches have some commonalities in themes such as unconscious, psychopathology, etc., they explain these themes and personality in different ways which may complement each other. In this study the contribution of trait approach to personality and Roger's, one of the well known names of humanistic approach, with his Q-sort test, and the contribution of behaviorist approach with its emphasis of the environment on human behavior, specifically from the cohort's effect on personality characteristics of millenials can be understood. However, the contributions of psychodynamic perspective and cognitive perspective are not excluded in the sense that although they can not be measured in this research, they implicitly exist.Related with trait approach, many researchers in the field have searched for the personality factors and their measures. Especially the measure of Big Five that is composed of five factors, namely, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness is accepted as valid and reliable in various cultures (McCrea and Costa, 1997). Personality dimensions show disposition to coherent patterns of thoughts, feelings, and actions (McCrae, 2002). Revised Neo Personality Inventory assesses six specific lower level traits (facets) for each of the five function spheres or combinations of subset of attributes (domains), has been widely used (Costa & McCrae, 1995). Extraversion refers to being highly active, social and having positive feelings. Openness to experience represents the tendency to develop oneself in intellectual ways and to experience new ideas, things, people, etc. …","PeriodicalId":52427,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14706/JECOSS16614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

IntroductionEmotions can be explained by psysiological changes in the body, cognitions, learning processes, personality, social relations, experiences, psychological conditions, cultural practices, and are grounded in daily life (Strongman, 2003). Emotional intelligence is described as monitoring and evaluating one's own emotions, monitoring and evaluating emotions of others, regulating and using them (Hartel, et al. 2005). Whereas, cognitive intelligence is associated with the factual information about people, things, events, time, and place, emotional intelligence deals with the antecedents and mutual relations between these aspects of life (Terrell & Hughes, 2008). Personality can be defined as distinctive and stable ways of behavior (Ewen, 2010). Emotions and personality are known to be intertwined with each other. Some researches in the field (e.g. Caruso et al., 2002; Ghiabi & Besharat, 2011) have revealed that, there are significant relations between personality dimensions and emotional intelligence dimensions. This study aims to search this relation on millenials. Twenge (2009) discussed that the generation a person belongs to, can be slightly more influence on the person than his/her family. She added that it is essential to recognize the own realities of each and every generation within various contexts (Twenge, 2009). Millenials in Istanbul, Turkey are subjects of this research. However; the findings may be relevant in other cultures's generations within the limitations of specific historical, social, and economic conditions.Theoretical BackgroundAssesment of PersonalityPersonality has been studied thoroughly throughout the years and researchers have stated theories about personality. The psychodynamic perspective explains the effect of the unconscious, below the surface on the structure and development of personality, whereas the humanistic perspective underlines the positive human nature and self-actualizing capability on the structure and development of personality. The trait approach emphasizes the effect of conscious, above the surface and behavior patterns on the structure and development of personality, whereas the behaviorist theory focuses on the effect of environment and learning in shaping personality. Cognitive approach emphasizes the effect of mental processes on the structure and development of personality (Ewen, 2010). Although these approaches have some commonalities in themes such as unconscious, psychopathology, etc., they explain these themes and personality in different ways which may complement each other. In this study the contribution of trait approach to personality and Roger's, one of the well known names of humanistic approach, with his Q-sort test, and the contribution of behaviorist approach with its emphasis of the environment on human behavior, specifically from the cohort's effect on personality characteristics of millenials can be understood. However, the contributions of psychodynamic perspective and cognitive perspective are not excluded in the sense that although they can not be measured in this research, they implicitly exist.Related with trait approach, many researchers in the field have searched for the personality factors and their measures. Especially the measure of Big Five that is composed of five factors, namely, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness is accepted as valid and reliable in various cultures (McCrea and Costa, 1997). Personality dimensions show disposition to coherent patterns of thoughts, feelings, and actions (McCrae, 2002). Revised Neo Personality Inventory assesses six specific lower level traits (facets) for each of the five function spheres or combinations of subset of attributes (domains), has been widely used (Costa & McCrae, 1995). Extraversion refers to being highly active, social and having positive feelings. Openness to experience represents the tendency to develop oneself in intellectual ways and to experience new ideas, things, people, etc. …
千禧一代的人格特征和情绪智力水平:土耳其语境下的研究
情绪可以通过身体、认知、学习过程、个性、社会关系、经历、心理状况、文化习俗等方面的心理变化来解释,并且植根于日常生活(Strongman, 2003)。情商被描述为监测和评估自己的情绪,监测和评估他人的情绪,调节和使用它们(Hartel, et al. 2005)。认知智力与关于人、事、事件、时间和地点的事实信息有关,而情商则处理生活中这些方面的前提和相互关系(Terrell & Hughes, 2008)。个性可以定义为独特和稳定的行为方式(Ewen, 2010)。众所周知,情感和个性是相互交织在一起的。该领域的一些研究(如Caruso et al., 2002;Ghiabi & Besharat(2011)的研究表明,人格维度与情商维度之间存在显著的关系。本研究旨在探讨千禧一代的这种关系。Twenge(2009)讨论了一个人所属的时代对一个人的影响可能比他/她的家庭对一个人的影响略大。她补充说,在不同的背景下,认识到每一代人自己的现实是至关重要的(Twenge, 2009)。土耳其伊斯坦布尔的千禧一代是这项研究的对象。然而;在特定的历史、社会和经济条件的限制下,这些发现可能与其他文化的世代有关。理论背景人格评估多年来,人们对人格进行了深入的研究,研究人员提出了关于人格的理论。心理动力学的观点解释了潜意识在表面之下对人格结构和发展的影响,而人本主义的观点则强调了积极的人性和自我实现能力对人格结构和发展的影响。特质理论强调意识、表面和行为模式对人格结构和发展的影响,而行为主义理论则强调环境和学习对人格形成的影响。认知方法强调心理过程对人格结构和发展的影响(Ewen, 2010)。尽管这些方法在无意识、精神病理学等主题上有一些共同点,但它们以不同的方式解释这些主题和个性,这些方式可以相互补充。在本研究中,特质研究方法对人格的贡献,以及人文主义研究方法中著名的Roger的Q-sort测试,以及强调环境对人类行为的行为主义研究方法的贡献,特别是从群体对千禧一代人格特征的影响中可以理解。然而,心理动力学视角和认知视角的贡献并不被排除,尽管它们在本研究中无法测量,但它们隐含地存在。与特质方法相关,许多研究者都在探索人格因素及其测量方法。尤其是由外向性、宜人性、尽责性、神经质性和开放性五个因素组成的“大五”量表,在各种文化中被认为是有效和可靠的(McCrea和Costa, 1997)。人格维度显示了对连贯的思想、感觉和行为模式的倾向(麦克雷,2002)。修订后的新人格量表为五个功能领域或属性子集(领域)的组合评估六个特定的较低层次特征(方面),已被广泛使用(Costa & mcrae, 1995)。外向性指的是高度活跃、善于社交、有积极的情感。对经验的开放代表了以智力方式发展自己和体验新思想、新事物、新人物等的趋势. ...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies
Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信