Examining spatial accessibility to COVID-19 testing sites in Florida

IF 2.7 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Ran Tao, J. Downs, Theresa M. Beckie, Yuzhou Chen, W. McNelley
{"title":"Examining spatial accessibility to COVID-19 testing sites in Florida","authors":"Ran Tao, J. Downs, Theresa M. Beckie, Yuzhou Chen, W. McNelley","doi":"10.1080/19475683.2020.1833365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Massive and rapid testing is crucial for containing the spread of COVID-19. Health and policy planners must ensure that access to and uptake of SARS-CoV-2 testing is adequate and equitable. This study measures the spatial accessibility to testing sites in Florida at the census tract level at the end of May 2020, using the 2-step floating catchment area method that integrates both driving and walking modes. Accessibility scores were found to be heterogeneous across geographic regions and among different groups of people. In particular, many rural areas were in a testing desert. While people in larger cities tended to have better accessibility to testing, many did not have adequate accessibility at that time due to both capacity limitations and spatial factors. In particular, people without access to private vehicles and the elderly faced disadvantages in accessibility to testing sites even in urban areas. However, Black and low-income groups were disproportionally concentrated in neighbourhoods with above-average accessibility due to their closer proximity to testing sites. These results suggest that increased efforts are needed to reach vulnerable populations, including the elderly and those without private vehicles.","PeriodicalId":46270,"journal":{"name":"Annals of GIS","volume":"3 1","pages":"319 - 327"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of GIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2020.1833365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

ABSTRACT Massive and rapid testing is crucial for containing the spread of COVID-19. Health and policy planners must ensure that access to and uptake of SARS-CoV-2 testing is adequate and equitable. This study measures the spatial accessibility to testing sites in Florida at the census tract level at the end of May 2020, using the 2-step floating catchment area method that integrates both driving and walking modes. Accessibility scores were found to be heterogeneous across geographic regions and among different groups of people. In particular, many rural areas were in a testing desert. While people in larger cities tended to have better accessibility to testing, many did not have adequate accessibility at that time due to both capacity limitations and spatial factors. In particular, people without access to private vehicles and the elderly faced disadvantages in accessibility to testing sites even in urban areas. However, Black and low-income groups were disproportionally concentrated in neighbourhoods with above-average accessibility due to their closer proximity to testing sites. These results suggest that increased efforts are needed to reach vulnerable populations, including the elderly and those without private vehicles.
检查佛罗里达州COVID-19检测点的空间可达性
大规模和快速检测对于遏制COVID-19的传播至关重要。卫生和政策规划者必须确保充分和公平地获得和接受SARS-CoV-2检测。本研究采用两步浮动集水区法,结合驾驶和步行模式,在2020年5月底测量了佛罗里达州人口普察区水平测试点的空间可达性。可达性得分在不同地理区域和不同人群之间存在异质性。特别是,许多农村地区处于试验沙漠中。虽然大城市的人们往往有更好的可达性来进行测试,但由于容量限制和空间因素,当时许多人没有足够的可达性。特别是,即使在城市地区,没有私家车的人和老年人在进入检测地点方面也面临不利条件。然而,黑人和低收入群体不成比例地集中在可达性高于平均水平的社区,因为这些社区离测试地点更近。这些结果表明,需要加大努力,帮助弱势群体,包括老年人和没有私家车的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of GIS
Annals of GIS Multiple-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信