Engaging struggle: the deconstruction of the academy in leisure studies

Q3 Social Sciences
Dan Henhawk, F. Yuen, S. Barrick
{"title":"Engaging struggle: the deconstruction of the academy in leisure studies","authors":"Dan Henhawk, F. Yuen, S. Barrick","doi":"10.1080/14927713.2022.2152364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For some time, we, the guest editors of this special issue (Simon Barrick, Dan Henhawk and Felice Yuen), along with many other leisure scholars have been engaged in discussions about struggle; struggles with research, struggles with one’s identity and of finding one’s place in academia, and struggles with the academy and the ways it is implicated in upholding a system of colonialism. As described by Sandy Grande (2004), colonialism is ‘a multidimensional force underwritten by Western Christianity, defined by white supremacy, and fueled by global capitalism’ (p. 19). The impetus to push forward this special issue of Leisure/Loisir stemmed from events surrounding the 16th Canadian Congress on Leisure Research (CCLR 16) held in May 2021. CCLR 16 was postponed from an in-person gathering to be held in Edmonton, Alberta, in May 2020, to a virtual gathering the following year due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the uncertain nature of global events during that time, the Canadian Association for Leisure Studies board of directors aligned CCLR 16 with the Federation for Humanities and Social Sciences’ Congress 2021 – an annual opportunity for Canadian Humanities and Social Sciences scholarly associations to gather individually and collectively each spring. However, amid widespread criticism of the Federation’s (in)action toward systemic discrimination and anti-Black racism – led by organizations such as the Black Canadian Studies Association (2021)– the CCLR 16 organizing committee opted to leave the Federation, returning CCLR 16 to an independent conference.","PeriodicalId":18056,"journal":{"name":"Leisure/Loisir","volume":"26 1","pages":"1 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leisure/Loisir","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14927713.2022.2152364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

For some time, we, the guest editors of this special issue (Simon Barrick, Dan Henhawk and Felice Yuen), along with many other leisure scholars have been engaged in discussions about struggle; struggles with research, struggles with one’s identity and of finding one’s place in academia, and struggles with the academy and the ways it is implicated in upholding a system of colonialism. As described by Sandy Grande (2004), colonialism is ‘a multidimensional force underwritten by Western Christianity, defined by white supremacy, and fueled by global capitalism’ (p. 19). The impetus to push forward this special issue of Leisure/Loisir stemmed from events surrounding the 16th Canadian Congress on Leisure Research (CCLR 16) held in May 2021. CCLR 16 was postponed from an in-person gathering to be held in Edmonton, Alberta, in May 2020, to a virtual gathering the following year due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the uncertain nature of global events during that time, the Canadian Association for Leisure Studies board of directors aligned CCLR 16 with the Federation for Humanities and Social Sciences’ Congress 2021 – an annual opportunity for Canadian Humanities and Social Sciences scholarly associations to gather individually and collectively each spring. However, amid widespread criticism of the Federation’s (in)action toward systemic discrimination and anti-Black racism – led by organizations such as the Black Canadian Studies Association (2021)– the CCLR 16 organizing committee opted to leave the Federation, returning CCLR 16 to an independent conference.
参与斗争:休闲研究中学院的解构
一段时间以来,我们,本期特刊的特邀编辑(西蒙·巴里克、丹·亨霍克和菲利斯·袁),以及许多其他休闲学者一直在讨论斗争;与研究作斗争,与自己的身份作斗争,与在学术界找到自己的位置作斗争,与学术界作斗争,与它与维护殖民主义制度有关的方式作斗争。正如Sandy Grande(2004)所描述的那样,殖民主义是“一种由西方基督教所支持的多维力量,由白人至上主义所定义,并由全球资本主义所推动”(第19页)。推动《Leisure/Loisir》特刊的动力源于2021年5月举行的第16届加拿大休闲研究大会(CCLR 16)。第16届会议原定于2020年5月在艾伯塔省埃德蒙顿举行现场会议,但由于新冠肺炎疫情,会议推迟到第二年举行虚拟会议。鉴于这段时间全球事件的不确定性,加拿大休闲研究协会董事会将CCLR 16与人文社会科学联合会2021年大会保持一致,这是加拿大人文社会科学学术协会每年春季单独或集体聚会的机会。然而,在诸如加拿大黑人研究协会(Black Canadian Studies Association)(2021年)等组织对联合会针对系统性歧视和反黑人种族主义的行动的广泛批评中,CCLR 16组委会选择离开联合会,将CCLR 16恢复为一个独立的会议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Leisure/Loisir
Leisure/Loisir Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信