Towards Increasing Unity and Continuing Executive Predominance Within the E(M)U Post-COVID?

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW
D. Fromage
{"title":"Towards Increasing Unity and Continuing Executive Predominance Within the E(M)U Post-COVID?","authors":"D. Fromage","doi":"10.54648/leie2020022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The eurocrisis led to significant reforms being conducted in the field of the European Union’s (EU’s) Economic and Monetary Union (EMU). In this framework, Member States executives, and Heads of States and Governments meeting in the European Council especially, played a key role, although the European Central Bank was long the ‘only game in town’. As a result of this and other evolutions witnessed over the past decade, the gap between euro area and EU28(7) appeared to be ever-widening when the COVID-19 pandemic broke out. This article analyses the institutional balance among E(M)U institutions in the immediate response to the pandemic, how this compares to the management of the eurocrisis, and how it may be expected to play out in the implementation of the measures adopted. It finds that, this time around, a wide range of EU institutions and bodies, and the Member States, mobilized swiftly and that Member States executives played a key role again. It also shows that significant trends in favour of greater unity within the E(M)U exist.\nEconomic and Monetary Union, European Banking Union, Executive predominance, Eurogroup, European Council, Euro Summit, Euro area, COVID crisis, eurocrisis","PeriodicalId":42718,"journal":{"name":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2020022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The eurocrisis led to significant reforms being conducted in the field of the European Union’s (EU’s) Economic and Monetary Union (EMU). In this framework, Member States executives, and Heads of States and Governments meeting in the European Council especially, played a key role, although the European Central Bank was long the ‘only game in town’. As a result of this and other evolutions witnessed over the past decade, the gap between euro area and EU28(7) appeared to be ever-widening when the COVID-19 pandemic broke out. This article analyses the institutional balance among E(M)U institutions in the immediate response to the pandemic, how this compares to the management of the eurocrisis, and how it may be expected to play out in the implementation of the measures adopted. It finds that, this time around, a wide range of EU institutions and bodies, and the Member States, mobilized swiftly and that Member States executives played a key role again. It also shows that significant trends in favour of greater unity within the E(M)U exist. Economic and Monetary Union, European Banking Union, Executive predominance, Eurogroup, European Council, Euro Summit, Euro area, COVID crisis, eurocrisis
covid - 19后欧盟内部加强团结和持续执行优势?
欧元危机导致欧盟(EU)经济与货币联盟(EMU)领域进行了重大改革。在这一框架中,尽管欧洲央行长期以来一直是“唯一的游戏”,但成员国行政人员,特别是参加欧洲理事会会议的国家元首和政府首脑发挥了关键作用。由于这一点以及过去十年中发生的其他变化,当COVID-19大流行爆发时,欧元区和欧盟28国之间的差距似乎在不断扩大。本文分析了欧(盟)盟机构在应对大流行方面的制度平衡,与欧元危机的管理相比如何,以及在实施所采取措施时如何发挥作用。报告发现,这一次,广泛的欧盟机构和机构以及成员国迅速动员起来,成员国高管再次发挥了关键作用。它还表明,存在有利于欧盟内部更大团结的显著趋势。经济和货币联盟,欧洲银行联盟,执行优势,欧元集团,欧洲理事会,欧元峰会,欧元区,COVID危机,欧元危机
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信