Electrical Stimulation of the Greater Auricular Nerve to Reduce Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation.

M. Andreas, P. Arzl, A. Mitterbauer, Nicolás M Ballarini, F. Kainz, A. Kocher, G. Laufer, M. Wolzt
{"title":"Electrical Stimulation of the Greater Auricular Nerve to Reduce Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation.","authors":"M. Andreas, P. Arzl, A. Mitterbauer, Nicolás M Ballarini, F. Kainz, A. Kocher, G. Laufer, M. Wolzt","doi":"10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nPostoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) occurs in up to 40% of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Invasive stimulation of the vagal nerve previously demonstrated a reduced risk of POAF. Therefore, we examined the antiarrhythmic and anti-inflammatory effects of noninvasive low-level transcutaneous electrical stimulation (LLTS) of the greater auricular nerve in a pilot trial including patients undergoing cardiac surgery.\n\n\nMETHODS\nPatients were randomized into a sham (n=20) or a treatment group (n=20) for LLTS. After cardiac surgery, electrodes were applied in the triangular fossa of the ear. Stimulation (amplitude 1 mA, frequency 1 Hz for 40 minutes, followed by a 20 minutes break) was performed for up to 2 weeks after cardiac surgery. Heart rhythm was recorded continuously using an ECG during the observation period. CRP (C-reactive protein) and IL (interleukin)-6 plasma concentrations were measured immediately after surgery as well as on day 2 and 7 postsurgery.\n\n\nRESULTS\nPatients receiving LLTS had a significantly reduced occurrence of POAF (4 of 20) when compared with controls (11 of 20, P=0.022) during a similar mean Holter recording period. The median duration of POAF was comparable between the treatment and the control group (878 [249; 1660] minutes versus 489 [148; 1775] minutes; P=0.661). No effect of LLTS on CRP or IL-6 levels was detectable.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nLLTS of the greater auricular nerve may be a potential therapy for POAF. We demonstrated the feasibility to conduct a randomized trial of neurostimulation as an outlay for a multisite clinical trial.","PeriodicalId":10167,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

BACKGROUND Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) occurs in up to 40% of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Invasive stimulation of the vagal nerve previously demonstrated a reduced risk of POAF. Therefore, we examined the antiarrhythmic and anti-inflammatory effects of noninvasive low-level transcutaneous electrical stimulation (LLTS) of the greater auricular nerve in a pilot trial including patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS Patients were randomized into a sham (n=20) or a treatment group (n=20) for LLTS. After cardiac surgery, electrodes were applied in the triangular fossa of the ear. Stimulation (amplitude 1 mA, frequency 1 Hz for 40 minutes, followed by a 20 minutes break) was performed for up to 2 weeks after cardiac surgery. Heart rhythm was recorded continuously using an ECG during the observation period. CRP (C-reactive protein) and IL (interleukin)-6 plasma concentrations were measured immediately after surgery as well as on day 2 and 7 postsurgery. RESULTS Patients receiving LLTS had a significantly reduced occurrence of POAF (4 of 20) when compared with controls (11 of 20, P=0.022) during a similar mean Holter recording period. The median duration of POAF was comparable between the treatment and the control group (878 [249; 1660] minutes versus 489 [148; 1775] minutes; P=0.661). No effect of LLTS on CRP or IL-6 levels was detectable. CONCLUSIONS LLTS of the greater auricular nerve may be a potential therapy for POAF. We demonstrated the feasibility to conduct a randomized trial of neurostimulation as an outlay for a multisite clinical trial.
电刺激耳大神经减少术后心房颤动。
背景:高达40%的心脏手术患者发生术后心房颤动(POAF)。侵袭性刺激迷走神经先前证明可降低POAF的风险。因此,我们研究了无创低水平经皮耳大神经电刺激(LLTS)的抗心律失常和抗炎作用,其中包括接受心脏手术的患者。方法将患者随机分为假手术组(n=20)和治疗组(n=20)。心脏手术后,电极应用于耳三角窝。心脏手术后进行长达2周的刺激(幅度1 mA,频率1 Hz,持续40分钟,然后休息20分钟)。观察期间用心电图连续记录心律。术后立即以及术后第2天和第7天测定CRP (c -反应蛋白)和IL(白细胞介素)-6的血浆浓度。结果在相似的平均霍尔特记录期间,与对照组(11 / 20,P=0.022)相比,接受LLTS的患者POAF发生率显著降低(4 / 20)。POAF的中位持续时间在治疗组和对照组之间相当(878 [249;1660] vs . 489 [148;1775分钟;P = 0.661)。未检测到LLTS对CRP或IL-6水平的影响。结论耳大神经阻滞可能是治疗POAF的一种有效方法。我们证明了将神经刺激作为多地点临床试验费用进行随机试验的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信