Leverpress escape/avoidance conditioning in rats: safety signal length and avoidance performance.

Francis X Brennan, Kevin D Beck, Richard J Servatius
{"title":"Leverpress escape/avoidance conditioning in rats: safety signal length and avoidance performance.","authors":"Francis X Brennan,&nbsp;Kevin D Beck,&nbsp;Richard J Servatius","doi":"10.1007/BF02734259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Leverpress escape/avoidance is an excellent model for assessing coping in rats. Acquisition of the leverpress response is determined by the interstimulus (signal-shock) interval, as well as the type and duration of the aversive event. One factor that has received less research attention is the safety or feedback signal. The safety signal presumably negatively reinforces leverpress responding through fear reduction. Here, we present a parametric manipulation of safety signal length and avoidance performance. All rats were trained with a 60-s tone conditioned stimulus and an intermittent 1-s, 1.0-mA footshock. Training was further accomplished with a 1-, 2-, 4-, or 6-min safety signal. Acquisition of the avoidance response was comparable at all safety signal durations. Rats trained with the shortest safety signal (1 min) exhibited more leverpresses during the safe period, a measure of anxiety. Thus, acquisition of the leverpress avoidance response was efficient regardless of safety signal duration, even though shorter periods were associated with greater anxiety.</p>","PeriodicalId":73397,"journal":{"name":"Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society","volume":"38 1","pages":"36-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02734259","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02734259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Leverpress escape/avoidance is an excellent model for assessing coping in rats. Acquisition of the leverpress response is determined by the interstimulus (signal-shock) interval, as well as the type and duration of the aversive event. One factor that has received less research attention is the safety or feedback signal. The safety signal presumably negatively reinforces leverpress responding through fear reduction. Here, we present a parametric manipulation of safety signal length and avoidance performance. All rats were trained with a 60-s tone conditioned stimulus and an intermittent 1-s, 1.0-mA footshock. Training was further accomplished with a 1-, 2-, 4-, or 6-min safety signal. Acquisition of the avoidance response was comparable at all safety signal durations. Rats trained with the shortest safety signal (1 min) exhibited more leverpresses during the safe period, a measure of anxiety. Thus, acquisition of the leverpress avoidance response was efficient regardless of safety signal duration, even though shorter periods were associated with greater anxiety.

大鼠杠杆逃避/回避条件反射:安全信号长度和回避表现。
杠杆逃避是评估大鼠应对能力的一个很好的模型。杠杆反应的获得取决于刺激间(信号-冲击)间隔,以及厌恶事件的类型和持续时间。一个受到较少研究关注的因素是安全或反馈信号。安全信号可能会通过减少恐惧消极地加强杠杆反应。在这里,我们提出了安全信号长度和回避性能的参数操作。所有大鼠均接受60秒的音调条件刺激和1秒、1.0 ma的间歇足震训练。训练通过1、2、4或6分钟的安全信号进一步完成。在所有安全信号持续时间内,回避反应的获取具有可比性。用最短的安全信号(1分钟)训练的大鼠在安全期间(一种焦虑的度量)表现出更多的杠杆。因此,无论安全信号持续时间长短,杠杆按压回避反应的获得都是有效的,尽管更短的时间与更大的焦虑有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信