CPEC THROUGH THE LENS OF PRINT MEDIA: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH NEWSPAPERS OF PAKISTAN AND CHINA

Waqar Ahamd, Sajjad Ali, Z. Yaseen
{"title":"CPEC THROUGH THE LENS OF PRINT MEDIA: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH NEWSPAPERS OF PAKISTAN AND CHINA","authors":"Waqar Ahamd, Sajjad Ali, Z. Yaseen","doi":"10.51380/gujr-36-02-07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed at evaluating print media’s agenda regarding China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), flagship Belt and Road initiative, and a huge development plan between China and Pakistan. For this purpose, researchers collected data from a Pakistani newspaper The News International and a Chinese newspaper Daily China to compare the portrayal of CPEC. Quantitative analysis was used for collection of data, which was collected through purposive sampling. The timeframe of the study is from January 1, 2018, to June 30, 2018. The results supported the study’s objectives and hypotheses. It is concluded that both the newspapers covered CPEC; however, The News International published more CPEC-related project stories than China Daily. The former paper published 57 news stories, while the latter published 33. The variables of the study were revenue and economy, services and employment, transport & infrastructure, energy & power, investment and security, debt and economic aid, environmental destruction, cheap labor, ethnic conflict and international, and sovereignty. Study revealed that both newspapers framed the project positively, although some frames were negative.","PeriodicalId":20643,"journal":{"name":"Proposed for presentation at the 2020 Virtual MRS Fall Meeting & Exhibit held November 27 - December 4, 2020.","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proposed for presentation at the 2020 Virtual MRS Fall Meeting & Exhibit held November 27 - December 4, 2020.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51380/gujr-36-02-07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed at evaluating print media’s agenda regarding China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), flagship Belt and Road initiative, and a huge development plan between China and Pakistan. For this purpose, researchers collected data from a Pakistani newspaper The News International and a Chinese newspaper Daily China to compare the portrayal of CPEC. Quantitative analysis was used for collection of data, which was collected through purposive sampling. The timeframe of the study is from January 1, 2018, to June 30, 2018. The results supported the study’s objectives and hypotheses. It is concluded that both the newspapers covered CPEC; however, The News International published more CPEC-related project stories than China Daily. The former paper published 57 news stories, while the latter published 33. The variables of the study were revenue and economy, services and employment, transport & infrastructure, energy & power, investment and security, debt and economic aid, environmental destruction, cheap labor, ethnic conflict and international, and sovereignty. Study revealed that both newspapers framed the project positively, although some frames were negative.
纸媒视野下的中巴经济走廊:巴基斯坦和中国英文报纸的比较分析
本研究旨在评估纸媒关于中巴经济走廊(CPEC)、旗舰“一带一路”倡议以及中巴之间巨大发展计划的议程。为此,研究人员收集了巴基斯坦报纸《国际新闻报》和中国报纸《中国日报》的数据,比较了中巴经济走廊的描述。数据的收集采用定量分析,通过有目的的抽样收集。研究时间为2018年1月1日至2018年6月30日。研究结果支持了研究的目标和假设。结论是,两家报纸都报道了中巴经济走廊;然而,《国际新闻报》发表的中巴经济走廊相关项目报道比《中国日报》多。前者发表了57篇新闻报道,后者发表了33篇。该研究的变量包括收入和经济、服务和就业、交通和基础设施、能源和电力、投资和安全、债务和经济援助、环境破坏、廉价劳动力、种族冲突和国际以及主权。研究显示,两家报纸都积极地描述了这个项目,尽管有些是消极的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信