Gender-based differences in assessment and management of acute abdominal pain in the emergency department: A retrospective audit

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Megan Hayes , Ana Hutchinson , Debra Kerr
{"title":"Gender-based differences in assessment and management of acute abdominal pain in the emergency department: A retrospective audit","authors":"Megan Hayes ,&nbsp;Ana Hutchinson ,&nbsp;Debra Kerr","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2023.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Previous research has identified gender-based differences in acute pain management in the </span>emergency department<span> [ED]. The aim of this study was to compare pharmacological management of acute abdominal pain in the ED by gender.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective chart audit<span> was conducted at one private metropolitan ED including adult patients (18–80 years) who presented with acute abdominal pain in 2019. Exclusion criteria included: pregnancy, repeat presentation within the study period, pain-free at initial medical review or documented refusal of analgesia, and oligo-analgesia. Comparisons by gender included: (1) analgesia type and (2) time to analgesia. Bivariate analysis was undertaken using SPSS.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 192 participants: 61 (31.6 %) men and 131 (67.9 %) women. Men were more likely to get combined opioid and non-opioid medication as first line analgesia (men: 26.2 % n = 16; women: 14.5 % n = 19, <em>p</em> = .049). Median time from ED presentation to analgesia was 80 min for men (IQR: 60) versus 94 min for women (IQR: 58), (<em>p</em><span> = .119). Women (25.2 % n = 33) were more likely to receive their first analgesic after 90 min from ED presentation compared to men versus men (11.5 %, n = 7 </span><em>p</em> = .029). In addition, women waited longer before receiving second analgesia (women: 94, men: 30 min, <em>p</em> = .032).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Findings confirm there are differences in pharmacological management of acute abdominal pain in the ED. Larger studies are required to further explore differences observed in this study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":"26 4","pages":"Pages 290-295"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588994X23000222","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Previous research has identified gender-based differences in acute pain management in the emergency department [ED]. The aim of this study was to compare pharmacological management of acute abdominal pain in the ED by gender.

Methods

A retrospective chart audit was conducted at one private metropolitan ED including adult patients (18–80 years) who presented with acute abdominal pain in 2019. Exclusion criteria included: pregnancy, repeat presentation within the study period, pain-free at initial medical review or documented refusal of analgesia, and oligo-analgesia. Comparisons by gender included: (1) analgesia type and (2) time to analgesia. Bivariate analysis was undertaken using SPSS.

Results

There were 192 participants: 61 (31.6 %) men and 131 (67.9 %) women. Men were more likely to get combined opioid and non-opioid medication as first line analgesia (men: 26.2 % n = 16; women: 14.5 % n = 19, p = .049). Median time from ED presentation to analgesia was 80 min for men (IQR: 60) versus 94 min for women (IQR: 58), (p = .119). Women (25.2 % n = 33) were more likely to receive their first analgesic after 90 min from ED presentation compared to men versus men (11.5 %, n = 7 p = .029). In addition, women waited longer before receiving second analgesia (women: 94, men: 30 min, p = .032).

Conclusion

Findings confirm there are differences in pharmacological management of acute abdominal pain in the ED. Larger studies are required to further explore differences observed in this study.

急诊科急性腹痛评估和治疗中基于性别的差异:一项回顾性审计。
背景:先前的研究已经确定了急诊科急性疼痛管理中基于性别的差异[ED]。本研究的目的是按性别比较ED急性腹痛的药物治疗。方法:在一家私立大都市急诊室进行回顾性图表审计,包括2019年出现急性腹痛的成年患者(18-80岁)。排除标准包括:妊娠、研究期内重复出现、初次医学检查时无疼痛或有记录的拒绝镇痛和寡镇痛。性别比较包括:(1)镇痛类型和(2)镇痛时间。结果:共有192名参与者:男性61名(31.6%),女性131名(67.9%)。男性更有可能接受阿片类和非阿片类药物联合用药作为一线镇痛(男性:26.2%n=16;女性:14.5%n=19,p=0.049)。从ED出现到镇痛的中位时间男性为80分钟(IQR:60),女性为94分钟(IQR:58),(p=.119)。与男性相比,女性(25.2%n=33)更有可能在ED出现90分钟后接受第一次镇痛(11.5%,n=7 p=.029)。此外,女性在接受第二次镇痛前等待的时间更长(女性:94,男性:30分钟,p=0.032)。结论:研究结果证实ED中急性腹痛的药物治疗存在差异。需要进行更大规模的研究来进一步探索本研究中观察到的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Emergency Care
Australasian Emergency Care Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信