An ensemble method for the credibility assessment of user-generated content

Julien Fontanarava, G. Pasi, Marco Viviani
{"title":"An ensemble method for the credibility assessment of user-generated content","authors":"Julien Fontanarava, G. Pasi, Marco Viviani","doi":"10.1145/3106426.3106464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Social Web supports and fosters social interactions by means of different social media, which allow the spread of the so called User-Generated Content (UGC). In this context, characterized by the absence of trusted third parties that verify the reliability of the sources and the believability of the content generated, the issue of assessing the credibility of the information diffused by means of social media is receiving increasing attention. In the literature, this issue has been mainly tackled as a classification problem; information is categorized into genuine and fake, usually by implementing or applying classifiers that consider multiple kinds of features (mainly textual and non-textual) to be evaluated in terms of credibility. In this article, unlike prior research, textual features are considered separately with respect to other kinds of features during the classification process. In particular, an Ensemble Method that combines the results produced by two text classifiers and the ones returned by another classifier acting on non-textual features is proposed. This allows to have better results with respect to the use of a single classifier on multiple features together. The effectiveness of the Ensemble Method has been assessed in the context of review sites, by means of a labeled dataset gathered from the Yelp.com site, where on-line reviews are already classified as recommended and not recommended.","PeriodicalId":20685,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3106426.3106464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The Social Web supports and fosters social interactions by means of different social media, which allow the spread of the so called User-Generated Content (UGC). In this context, characterized by the absence of trusted third parties that verify the reliability of the sources and the believability of the content generated, the issue of assessing the credibility of the information diffused by means of social media is receiving increasing attention. In the literature, this issue has been mainly tackled as a classification problem; information is categorized into genuine and fake, usually by implementing or applying classifiers that consider multiple kinds of features (mainly textual and non-textual) to be evaluated in terms of credibility. In this article, unlike prior research, textual features are considered separately with respect to other kinds of features during the classification process. In particular, an Ensemble Method that combines the results produced by two text classifiers and the ones returned by another classifier acting on non-textual features is proposed. This allows to have better results with respect to the use of a single classifier on multiple features together. The effectiveness of the Ensemble Method has been assessed in the context of review sites, by means of a labeled dataset gathered from the Yelp.com site, where on-line reviews are already classified as recommended and not recommended.
用户生成内容可信度评估的集成方法
社交网络通过不同的社交媒体支持和促进社会互动,这使得所谓的用户生成内容(UGC)得以传播。在这种背景下,由于缺乏可信任的第三方来验证来源的可靠性和所生成内容的可信度,评估通过社交媒体传播的信息的可信度的问题日益受到关注。在文献中,这个问题主要作为分类问题来解决;信息被分类为真假,通常通过实现或应用考虑多种特征(主要是文本和非文本)的分类器来评估可信度。在本文中,与以往的研究不同,在分类过程中,文本特征与其他类型的特征分开考虑。特别地,提出了一种集成方法,该方法将两个文本分类器产生的结果与另一个分类器对非文本特征的返回结果相结合。这使得在多个特征上一起使用单个分类器可以获得更好的结果。集成方法的有效性已经在评论网站的背景下进行了评估,通过从Yelp.com网站收集的标记数据集,在线评论已经被分类为推荐和不推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信