Effective Access to Defence Counsel in the Judicial Stage of Polish Criminal Proceedings in the Scope of Directives 2013/48/EU and 2016/1919/EU

Adrian Zbiciak
{"title":"Effective Access to Defence Counsel in the Judicial Stage of Polish Criminal Proceedings in the Scope of Directives 2013/48/EU and 2016/1919/EU","authors":"Adrian Zbiciak","doi":"10.31743/recl.6429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyses certain regulations of the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the right of the accused to access a defence counsel, limited to the stage of proceedings before a court, in the context of the provisions of the two European Union’s legal acts regarding this issue: Directive 2013/48/EU and Directive 2016/1919/EU. The provisions of the Polish CCP give the opportunity to maintain the standard of Directive 2013/48. However, the problem may occur when there is an ex officio defence counsel appointed and the court would decide to proceed in his/her absence. As for the standard arising from Directive 2016/1919, Polish provisions regarding the stage of judicial proceedings meet the European standard to a level even higher than the minimum. The only significant problem may arise from the obligation to submit an application for the appointment of an ex officio defence counsel within a specified period, but still due to specific solutions provided in Polish CCP, the standard of 2016 Directive is implemented.","PeriodicalId":20823,"journal":{"name":"Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas","volume":"65 1","pages":"153-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.6429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article analyses certain regulations of the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the right of the accused to access a defence counsel, limited to the stage of proceedings before a court, in the context of the provisions of the two European Union’s legal acts regarding this issue: Directive 2013/48/EU and Directive 2016/1919/EU. The provisions of the Polish CCP give the opportunity to maintain the standard of Directive 2013/48. However, the problem may occur when there is an ex officio defence counsel appointed and the court would decide to proceed in his/her absence. As for the standard arising from Directive 2016/1919, Polish provisions regarding the stage of judicial proceedings meet the European standard to a level even higher than the minimum. The only significant problem may arise from the obligation to submit an application for the appointment of an ex officio defence counsel within a specified period, but still due to specific solutions provided in Polish CCP, the standard of 2016 Directive is implemented.
在2013/48/EU和2016/1919/EU指令范围内的波兰刑事诉讼司法阶段有效获得辩护律师
本文分析了波兰刑事诉讼法中关于被告在法庭诉讼阶段获得辩护律师的权利的某些规定,并结合欧盟关于这一问题的两项法律法案的规定:2013/48/EU指令和2016/1919/EU指令。波兰CCP的规定为维持2013/48号指令的标准提供了机会。但是,当指定了一名当然辩护律师,而法院决定在他/她缺席的情况下进行诉讼时,可能会出现问题。至于2016/1919号指令产生的标准,波兰关于司法程序阶段的规定达到了欧洲标准,甚至高于最低标准。唯一的重大问题可能来自于在规定期限内提交任命当然辩护律师的申请的义务,但由于波兰CCP提供的具体解决方案,2016年指令的标准得以实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信