M. Mileusnic, P. Petrovic, V. Kosjer, A. Lebl, B. Pavić
{"title":"Reliability analysis of different RCIED activation signal responsive jamming techniques and their comparison to active jamming","authors":"M. Mileusnic, P. Petrovic, V. Kosjer, A. Lebl, B. Pavić","doi":"10.2298/fuee2003459m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we compared the time required for the successful jamming of\n remote controlled improvised explosive devices activation using active and\n responsive jamming methods. As a representative of active jamming method we\n analyzed jamming signal generation using frequency sweep. For the analysis\n of the possible activating signal presence based on responsive jamming\n procedures we first supposed Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) implementation and\n compared its analysis rate to the rate of sweep jamming. Taking into account\n the current technology state, it is proved that the time required to achieve\n the successful jamming relied on FFT analysis may be less than in the case\n of active sweep jamming. After that we considered pros and cons for energy\n detector and matched filter detector implementation in responsive jamming.\n For these two detector types it is shown how to determine the number of\n analysis blocks to achieve approximately the same number of collected\n samples as in the case of FFT implementation, starting from the\n probabilities of false detection and miss of detection.","PeriodicalId":44296,"journal":{"name":"Facta Universitatis-Series Electronics and Energetics","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facta Universitatis-Series Electronics and Energetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/fuee2003459m","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In this paper we compared the time required for the successful jamming of
remote controlled improvised explosive devices activation using active and
responsive jamming methods. As a representative of active jamming method we
analyzed jamming signal generation using frequency sweep. For the analysis
of the possible activating signal presence based on responsive jamming
procedures we first supposed Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) implementation and
compared its analysis rate to the rate of sweep jamming. Taking into account
the current technology state, it is proved that the time required to achieve
the successful jamming relied on FFT analysis may be less than in the case
of active sweep jamming. After that we considered pros and cons for energy
detector and matched filter detector implementation in responsive jamming.
For these two detector types it is shown how to determine the number of
analysis blocks to achieve approximately the same number of collected
samples as in the case of FFT implementation, starting from the
probabilities of false detection and miss of detection.