Reliability analysis of different RCIED activation signal responsive jamming techniques and their comparison to active jamming

IF 0.6 Q4 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
M. Mileusnic, P. Petrovic, V. Kosjer, A. Lebl, B. Pavić
{"title":"Reliability analysis of different RCIED activation signal responsive jamming techniques and their comparison to active jamming","authors":"M. Mileusnic, P. Petrovic, V. Kosjer, A. Lebl, B. Pavić","doi":"10.2298/fuee2003459m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we compared the time required for the successful jamming of\n remote controlled improvised explosive devices activation using active and\n responsive jamming methods. As a representative of active jamming method we\n analyzed jamming signal generation using frequency sweep. For the analysis\n of the possible activating signal presence based on responsive jamming\n procedures we first supposed Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) implementation and\n compared its analysis rate to the rate of sweep jamming. Taking into account\n the current technology state, it is proved that the time required to achieve\n the successful jamming relied on FFT analysis may be less than in the case\n of active sweep jamming. After that we considered pros and cons for energy\n detector and matched filter detector implementation in responsive jamming.\n For these two detector types it is shown how to determine the number of\n analysis blocks to achieve approximately the same number of collected\n samples as in the case of FFT implementation, starting from the\n probabilities of false detection and miss of detection.","PeriodicalId":44296,"journal":{"name":"Facta Universitatis-Series Electronics and Energetics","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facta Universitatis-Series Electronics and Energetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/fuee2003459m","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper we compared the time required for the successful jamming of remote controlled improvised explosive devices activation using active and responsive jamming methods. As a representative of active jamming method we analyzed jamming signal generation using frequency sweep. For the analysis of the possible activating signal presence based on responsive jamming procedures we first supposed Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) implementation and compared its analysis rate to the rate of sweep jamming. Taking into account the current technology state, it is proved that the time required to achieve the successful jamming relied on FFT analysis may be less than in the case of active sweep jamming. After that we considered pros and cons for energy detector and matched filter detector implementation in responsive jamming. For these two detector types it is shown how to determine the number of analysis blocks to achieve approximately the same number of collected samples as in the case of FFT implementation, starting from the probabilities of false detection and miss of detection.
不同RCIED激活信号响应式干扰技术的可靠性分析及其与有源干扰的比较
本文比较了主动式干扰和响应式干扰对遥控简易爆炸装置激活成功的干扰时间。作为有源干扰方法的代表,分析了采用扫频法产生干扰信号的方法。为了分析响应式干扰过程中可能存在的激活信号,我们首先假设了快速傅里叶变换(FFT)的实现,并将其分析率与扫描干扰的分析率进行了比较。考虑到目前的技术状况,证明了依靠FFT分析实现成功干扰所需的时间可能少于主动扫描干扰。之后,我们考虑了能量检测器和匹配滤波检测器在响应干扰中的优缺点。对于这两种检测器类型,展示了如何确定分析块的数量,以实现与FFT实现情况下收集的样本数量大致相同,从误检测和未检测的概率开始。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Facta Universitatis-Series Electronics and Energetics
Facta Universitatis-Series Electronics and Energetics ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC-
自引率
16.70%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信