Evaluation of Medical Certification of Cause of Death in Tertiary Cancer Hospitals in Northern India.

Akash Anand, Divya Khanna, Payal Singh, Anuj Singh, Abhishek Pandey, Atul Budukh, Satyajit Pradhan
{"title":"Evaluation of Medical Certification of Cause of Death in Tertiary Cancer Hospitals in Northern India.","authors":"Akash Anand, Divya Khanna, Payal Singh, Anuj Singh, Abhishek Pandey, Atul Budukh, Satyajit Pradhan","doi":"10.1177/18333583221144665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical certification of cause of death (MCCD) provides valuable data regarding disease burden in a community and for formulating health policy. Inaccurate MCCDs can significantly impair the precision of national health information.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of cause of death certificates prepared at two tertiary cancer care hospitals in Northern India during the study period (May 2018 to December 2020).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective observational study at two tertiary cancer care hospitals in Varanasi, India, over a period of two and a half years. Medical records and cause of death certificates of all decedents were examined. Demographic characteristics, administrative details and cause of death data were collected using the WHO recommended death certificates. Accuracy of death certification was validated by electronic medical records and errors were graded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 778 deaths occurred in the two centres during the study period. Of these, only 30 (3.9%) certificates were error-free; 591 (75.9%) certificates had an inappropriate immediate cause of death; 231 (29.7%) certificates had incorrectly labelled modes of death as the immediate cause of death; and 585 (75.2%) certificates had an incorrect underlying cause of death. The majority of certificates were prepared by junior doctors and were significantly associated with higher certification errors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A high rate of errors was identified in death certification at the cancer care hospitals during the study period. Inaccurate MCCDs related to cancers can potentially influence cancer statistics and thereby affect policy making for cancer control.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This study has identified the pressing need for appropriate interventions to improve quality of certification through training of doctors.</p>","PeriodicalId":73210,"journal":{"name":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","volume":" ","pages":"121-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18333583221144665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical certification of cause of death (MCCD) provides valuable data regarding disease burden in a community and for formulating health policy. Inaccurate MCCDs can significantly impair the precision of national health information.

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of cause of death certificates prepared at two tertiary cancer care hospitals in Northern India during the study period (May 2018 to December 2020).

Method: A retrospective observational study at two tertiary cancer care hospitals in Varanasi, India, over a period of two and a half years. Medical records and cause of death certificates of all decedents were examined. Demographic characteristics, administrative details and cause of death data were collected using the WHO recommended death certificates. Accuracy of death certification was validated by electronic medical records and errors were graded.

Results: A total of 778 deaths occurred in the two centres during the study period. Of these, only 30 (3.9%) certificates were error-free; 591 (75.9%) certificates had an inappropriate immediate cause of death; 231 (29.7%) certificates had incorrectly labelled modes of death as the immediate cause of death; and 585 (75.2%) certificates had an incorrect underlying cause of death. The majority of certificates were prepared by junior doctors and were significantly associated with higher certification errors.

Conclusion: A high rate of errors was identified in death certification at the cancer care hospitals during the study period. Inaccurate MCCDs related to cancers can potentially influence cancer statistics and thereby affect policy making for cancer control.

Implications: This study has identified the pressing need for appropriate interventions to improve quality of certification through training of doctors.

对印度北部三级癌症医院死因医学证明的评估》(Evaluation of Medical Certification of Cause of Death in Tertiary Cancer Hospitals in Northern India)。
背景:死因医学证明(MCCD)提供了有关社区疾病负担和制定卫生政策的宝贵数据。不准确的死因医学证明会严重影响国家卫生信息的准确性:评估研究期间(2018 年 5 月至 2020 年 12 月)印度北部两家三级癌症治疗医院准备的死因证明的准确性:对印度瓦拉纳西的两家三级癌症治疗医院进行为期两年半的回顾性观察研究。对所有死者的医疗记录和死因证明进行了检查。使用世界卫生组织推荐的死亡证明收集了人口特征、管理细节和死因数据。电子病历验证了死亡证明的准确性,并对错误进行了分级:研究期间,两个中心共有 778 例死亡病例。其中,只有30份(3.9%)死亡证明书没有错误;591份(75.9%)死亡证明书的直接死因不恰当;231份(29.7%)死亡证明书将死亡方式错误地标注为直接死因;585份(75.2%)死亡证明书的基本死因不正确。大多数死亡证明是由初级医生制作的,这与证明错误率较高有很大关系:结论:在研究期间,癌症治疗医院的死亡证明出错率很高。与癌症有关的 MCCD 不准确可能会影响癌症统计数据,从而影响癌症控制政策的制定:这项研究表明,迫切需要采取适当的干预措施,通过培训医生来提高认证质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信