Chest computed tomography of suspected COVID-19 pneumonia in the Emergency Department: comparative analysis between patients with different vaccination status.

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Luca Alessandro Carbonaro, Francesca Braga, Pietro Gemma, Eleonora Carlicchi, Annamaria Pata, Martina Conca, Francesco Rizzetto, Angelo Vanzulli
{"title":"Chest computed tomography of suspected COVID-19 pneumonia in the Emergency Department: comparative analysis between patients with different vaccination status.","authors":"Luca Alessandro Carbonaro,&nbsp;Francesca Braga,&nbsp;Pietro Gemma,&nbsp;Eleonora Carlicchi,&nbsp;Annamaria Pata,&nbsp;Martina Conca,&nbsp;Francesco Rizzetto,&nbsp;Angelo Vanzulli","doi":"10.5114/pjr.2023.125010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify differences in chest computed tomography (CT) of the symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) population according to the patients' severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination status (non-vaccinated, vaccinated with incomplete or complete vaccination cycle).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>CT examinations performed in the Emergency Department (ED) in May-November 2021 for suspected COVID-19 pneumonia with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test were retrospectively included. Personal data were compared for vaccination status. One 13-year experienced radiologist and two 4th-year radiology residents independently evaluated chest CT scans according to CO-RADS and ACR COVID classifications. In possible COVID-19 pneumonia cases, defined as CO-RADS 3 to 5 (ACR indeterminate and typical) by each reader, high involvement CT score (≥ 25%) and CT patterns (presence of ground glass opacities, consolidations, crazy paving areas) were compared for vaccination status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>184 patients with known vaccination status were included in the analysis: 111 non-vaccinated (60%) for SARS-CoV-2 infection, 21 (11%) with an incomplete vaccination cycle, and 52 (28%) with a complete vaccination cycle (6 different vaccine types). Multivariate logistic regression showed that the only factor predicting the absence of pneumonia (CO-RADS 1 and ACR negative cases) for the 3 readers was a complete vaccination cycle (OR = 12.8-13.1compared to non-vaccinated patients, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.032). Neither CT score nor CT patterns of possible COVID-19 pneumonia showed any statistically significant correlation with vaccination status for the 3 readers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with a complete vaccination cycle had much higher odds of showing a negative CT chest examination in ED compared to non-vaccinated patients. Neither CT involvement nor CT patterns of interstitial pneumonia showed differences across different vaccination status.</p>","PeriodicalId":47128,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bf/ad/PJR-88-50130.PMC9995244.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2023.125010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To identify differences in chest computed tomography (CT) of the symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) population according to the patients' severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination status (non-vaccinated, vaccinated with incomplete or complete vaccination cycle).

Material and methods: CT examinations performed in the Emergency Department (ED) in May-November 2021 for suspected COVID-19 pneumonia with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test were retrospectively included. Personal data were compared for vaccination status. One 13-year experienced radiologist and two 4th-year radiology residents independently evaluated chest CT scans according to CO-RADS and ACR COVID classifications. In possible COVID-19 pneumonia cases, defined as CO-RADS 3 to 5 (ACR indeterminate and typical) by each reader, high involvement CT score (≥ 25%) and CT patterns (presence of ground glass opacities, consolidations, crazy paving areas) were compared for vaccination status.

Results: 184 patients with known vaccination status were included in the analysis: 111 non-vaccinated (60%) for SARS-CoV-2 infection, 21 (11%) with an incomplete vaccination cycle, and 52 (28%) with a complete vaccination cycle (6 different vaccine types). Multivariate logistic regression showed that the only factor predicting the absence of pneumonia (CO-RADS 1 and ACR negative cases) for the 3 readers was a complete vaccination cycle (OR = 12.8-13.1compared to non-vaccinated patients, p ≤ 0.032). Neither CT score nor CT patterns of possible COVID-19 pneumonia showed any statistically significant correlation with vaccination status for the 3 readers.

Conclusions: Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with a complete vaccination cycle had much higher odds of showing a negative CT chest examination in ED compared to non-vaccinated patients. Neither CT involvement nor CT patterns of interstitial pneumonia showed differences across different vaccination status.

Abstract Image

急诊疑似COVID-19肺炎的胸部ct:不同疫苗接种状态患者的对比分析
目的:根据患者的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)疫苗接种情况(未接种、接种不完整或接种周期完整),确定症状性冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)人群胸部CT (CT)的差异。材料和方法:回顾性分析2021年5月至11月在急诊科(ED)进行的疑似COVID-19肺炎且SARS-CoV-2检测阳性的CT检查。比较个人资料的疫苗接种状况。一名有13年经验的放射科医生和两名有4年经验的放射科住院医生根据CO-RADS和ACR COVID分类独立评估胸部CT扫描。在可能的COVID-19肺炎病例中,每位读者将其定义为CO-RADS 3至5 (ACR不确定且典型),比较高受累CT评分(≥25%)和CT模式(存在磨玻璃混浊、实变、疯狂铺路区域)的疫苗接种情况。结果:184例已知疫苗接种情况的患者纳入分析:111例未接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗(60%),21例接种周期不完整(11%),52例(28%)接种周期完整(6种不同疫苗类型)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,预测3名读者肺炎(CO-RADS 1和ACR阴性病例)不存在的唯一因素是完整的疫苗接种周期(与未接种疫苗的患者相比,OR = 12.8-13.1, p≤0.032)。3名读者的CT评分和可能的COVID-19肺炎的CT模式与疫苗接种情况均无统计学意义的相关性。结论:与未接种疫苗的患者相比,接种完整疫苗周期的有症状的sars - cov -2感染患者在ED中显示CT胸部检查阴性的几率要高得多。不同疫苗接种状态间质性肺炎的CT征象和CT表现均无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Radiology
Polish Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信