Is gender-critical feminism feeding the neo-conservative anti-gender rhetoric? Snapshots from the Italian public debate.

IF 1.1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Journal of Lesbian Studies Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-06 DOI:10.1080/10894160.2023.2184908
Paolo Gusmeroli
{"title":"Is gender-critical feminism feeding the neo-conservative anti-gender rhetoric? Snapshots from the Italian public debate.","authors":"Paolo Gusmeroli","doi":"10.1080/10894160.2023.2184908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>So far, the Italian literature on the genesis and development of anti-gender mobilisation has focussed on right-wing and Vatican strategies, discourses, and alliances. However, in recent years debates around \"gender theory\" have prompted political and cultural conflicts inside Italian feminist, lesbian and secular left-wing movements and parties. These political fractures - mirrored also in the debate on TERF and \"gender-critical\" feminism - have become visible in the Italian public debate on the Zan Bill (an anti-homophobia provision rejected by Italian Parliament in 2021). Although \"gender critical\" feminists do not belong to the anti-gender movement - in Italy largely monopolised by right-wing and Catholic activists - I argue that the unexpected convergences towards the fight against \"gender ideology\" are relevant for, at least, two reasons. On one side, the idea of \"gender theory\" has reinforced its role as a keyword orienting Italian public discourse on sexual rights. On the other hand, criticism of various (although inconsistent) definitions of \"gender theory\" has broadened their cultural circulation outside conservative or religious groups, in both cases associated with processes of ideological colonisation. These two shifts can be considered to enact a relevant normalisation of anti-gender narratives within Italian public and political discourse fostered by media vulgarisation and popular understandings of the meaning of \"gender\".</p>","PeriodicalId":46044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lesbian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lesbian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10894160.2023.2184908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

So far, the Italian literature on the genesis and development of anti-gender mobilisation has focussed on right-wing and Vatican strategies, discourses, and alliances. However, in recent years debates around "gender theory" have prompted political and cultural conflicts inside Italian feminist, lesbian and secular left-wing movements and parties. These political fractures - mirrored also in the debate on TERF and "gender-critical" feminism - have become visible in the Italian public debate on the Zan Bill (an anti-homophobia provision rejected by Italian Parliament in 2021). Although "gender critical" feminists do not belong to the anti-gender movement - in Italy largely monopolised by right-wing and Catholic activists - I argue that the unexpected convergences towards the fight against "gender ideology" are relevant for, at least, two reasons. On one side, the idea of "gender theory" has reinforced its role as a keyword orienting Italian public discourse on sexual rights. On the other hand, criticism of various (although inconsistent) definitions of "gender theory" has broadened their cultural circulation outside conservative or religious groups, in both cases associated with processes of ideological colonisation. These two shifts can be considered to enact a relevant normalisation of anti-gender narratives within Italian public and political discourse fostered by media vulgarisation and popular understandings of the meaning of "gender".

性别批判女权主义是否助长了新保守主义的反性别言论?意大利公开辩论的快照。
到目前为止,意大利关于反性别动员的起源和发展的文献主要集中在右翼和梵蒂冈的战略、话语和联盟上。然而,近年来围绕“性别理论”的辩论在意大利女权主义、女同性恋和世俗左翼运动和政党内部引发了政治和文化冲突。这些政治分歧——也反映在关于TERF和“性别批判”女权主义的辩论中——在意大利关于《赞法案》(2021年被意大利议会否决的反恐同条款)的公开辩论中变得显而易见。尽管“性别批判”女权主义者不属于反性别运动——在意大利,反性别运动主要由右翼和天主教活动人士垄断——但我认为,反对“性别意识形态”的出乎意料的趋同至少有两个原因。一方面,“性别理论”的理念强化了其作为意大利性权利公共话语关键词的作用。另一方面,对“性别理论”的各种(尽管不一致)定义的批评扩大了其在保守派或宗教团体之外的文化传播,在这两种情况下都与意识形态殖民过程有关。这两种转变可以被认为是在意大利公共和政治话语中实现了反性别叙事的相关正常化,这是由媒体的庸俗化和大众对“性别”含义的理解所推动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Lesbian Studies
Journal of Lesbian Studies SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Lesbian Studies examines the cultural, historical, and interpersonal impact of the lesbian experience on society, keeping all readers—professional, academic, or general—informed and up to date on current findings, resources, and community concerns. Independent scholars, professors, students, and lay people will find this interdisciplinary journal essential on the topic of lesbian studies!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信