Footprints in Action: How UVA Is Managing Its Sustainability Stewardship.

Elizabeth Dukes, Selina Cheng, Samuel Mogen, James Galloway, Allison Leach, Andrea Ruedy Trimble, Andrew Pettit, Jana Compton, Michael Pennino
{"title":"Footprints in Action: How UVA Is Managing Its Sustainability Stewardship.","authors":"Elizabeth Dukes,&nbsp;Selina Cheng,&nbsp;Samuel Mogen,&nbsp;James Galloway,&nbsp;Allison Leach,&nbsp;Andrea Ruedy Trimble,&nbsp;Andrew Pettit,&nbsp;Jana Compton,&nbsp;Michael Pennino","doi":"10.1089/scc.2022.0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evaluating sustainability stewardship at higher educational institutions is essential to working towards improving our environment. Many institutions have used environmental footprint indicators as a way to evaluate, track, and improve their impact on the environment. In this article, we present the web-based Integrated Environmental Footprint Tool (IEFT), which allows users to test how changes in certain activities impact nitrogen (N), greenhouse gases (GHG), phosphorus (P), and water (W) footprints for a university campus. This study uses the University of Virginia (UVA) as a model to show the impacts of their existing sustainability plans on multiple footprint indicators. Strategies from the University of Virginia's (UVA) two exisiting action plans, the GHG Action Plan and the N Action Plan, are evaluated to determine their impact on each of the footprints (GHG, N, P, and W). Based on the 2025 goal year, the strategies in these action plans are estimated to reduce the GHG, N, P, and W footprints by -38%, 32%, 25%, and 2.7% respectively. The damage costs associated with GHG and N footprints are assessed and reveal a 38 percent reduction in damage costs for GHG and a 42 percent reduction in costs for N. Using the IEFT to evaluate the impact of these action plan strategies, UVA optimized environmental outcomes. The model shown here can be used at other institutions to evaluate the environmental impact of planned changes to an institutions' operations.</p>","PeriodicalId":74895,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability and climate change","volume":"16 1","pages":"48-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9994435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability and climate change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/scc.2022.0067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluating sustainability stewardship at higher educational institutions is essential to working towards improving our environment. Many institutions have used environmental footprint indicators as a way to evaluate, track, and improve their impact on the environment. In this article, we present the web-based Integrated Environmental Footprint Tool (IEFT), which allows users to test how changes in certain activities impact nitrogen (N), greenhouse gases (GHG), phosphorus (P), and water (W) footprints for a university campus. This study uses the University of Virginia (UVA) as a model to show the impacts of their existing sustainability plans on multiple footprint indicators. Strategies from the University of Virginia's (UVA) two exisiting action plans, the GHG Action Plan and the N Action Plan, are evaluated to determine their impact on each of the footprints (GHG, N, P, and W). Based on the 2025 goal year, the strategies in these action plans are estimated to reduce the GHG, N, P, and W footprints by -38%, 32%, 25%, and 2.7% respectively. The damage costs associated with GHG and N footprints are assessed and reveal a 38 percent reduction in damage costs for GHG and a 42 percent reduction in costs for N. Using the IEFT to evaluate the impact of these action plan strategies, UVA optimized environmental outcomes. The model shown here can be used at other institutions to evaluate the environmental impact of planned changes to an institutions' operations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

行动中的足迹:弗吉尼亚大学如何管理其可持续发展管理。
评估高等教育机构的可持续发展管理工作对于改善我们的环境至关重要。许多机构已经使用环境足迹指标作为评估、跟踪和改善其对环境影响的一种方式。在本文中,我们介绍了基于网络的综合环境足迹工具(IEFT),它允许用户测试某些活动的变化如何影响大学校园的氮(N)、温室气体(GHG)、磷(P)和水(W)足迹。本研究以弗吉尼亚大学(UVA)为模型,展示了其现有可持续发展计划对多个足迹指标的影响。弗吉尼亚大学(UVA)现有的两个行动计划,温室气体行动计划和氮行动计划的策略进行了评估,以确定它们对每种足迹(温室气体,氮,磷和W)的影响。基于2025年的目标年,这些行动计划中的策略估计将减少温室气体,氮,磷和W的足迹分别为-38%,32%,25%和2.7%。评估了与温室气体和氮足迹相关的损害成本,发现温室气体和氮足迹的损害成本分别降低了38%和42%。使用IEFT来评估这些行动计划策略的影响,UVA优化了环境结果。这里显示的模型可以在其他机构中使用,以评估计划变更对机构运营的环境影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信