“How will God hear us?”: Sonic and linguistic difference among Kinshasa’s Églises des Noirs

Margot Luyckfasseel
{"title":"“How will God hear us?”: Sonic and linguistic difference among Kinshasa’s Églises des Noirs","authors":"Margot Luyckfasseel","doi":"10.1017/S0001972023000542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article studies how anti-Christian, ‘traditionally African’ organizations, locally known as Églises des Noirs, navigate religious competition in the Congolese capital through sonic and linguistic strategies. It focuses on the understudied Mpadist community, a ‘dissident’ branch of the better known Kimbanguist church. Mpadists mobilize diverging appreciations and meanings of sound and language to set themselves apart from the dominant Lingalaphone Pentecostal loudness of the city. In doing so, they pursue a delicate balance between Kongo traditionalism, the source of their spiritual legitimacy, rooted in colonial prophetic movements, and tactics of ‘modern’ community making in order to remain competitive within Kinshasa’s prolific religious setting. The article argues that ideologies of sound and language should be analysed within the same nexus, for they operate and are operationalized in similar ways. It therefore proposes to expand the sociolinguistic notion of indexicality to incorporate elements of the volume and modalities of sound making. The article also shows that sonic and linguistic ideologies are bound by context. In Kinshasa’s ‘low-fi’ soundscape, the indexical values of the languages Kikongo and Lingala, and of unamplified and amplified sound production, share similar features, yet they are evaluated differently in rural ‘hi-fi’ sonic environments.","PeriodicalId":80373,"journal":{"name":"Africa : notiziario dell'Associazione fra le imprese italiane in Africa","volume":"41 1","pages":"351 - 370"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa : notiziario dell'Associazione fra le imprese italiane in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001972023000542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article studies how anti-Christian, ‘traditionally African’ organizations, locally known as Églises des Noirs, navigate religious competition in the Congolese capital through sonic and linguistic strategies. It focuses on the understudied Mpadist community, a ‘dissident’ branch of the better known Kimbanguist church. Mpadists mobilize diverging appreciations and meanings of sound and language to set themselves apart from the dominant Lingalaphone Pentecostal loudness of the city. In doing so, they pursue a delicate balance between Kongo traditionalism, the source of their spiritual legitimacy, rooted in colonial prophetic movements, and tactics of ‘modern’ community making in order to remain competitive within Kinshasa’s prolific religious setting. The article argues that ideologies of sound and language should be analysed within the same nexus, for they operate and are operationalized in similar ways. It therefore proposes to expand the sociolinguistic notion of indexicality to incorporate elements of the volume and modalities of sound making. The article also shows that sonic and linguistic ideologies are bound by context. In Kinshasa’s ‘low-fi’ soundscape, the indexical values of the languages Kikongo and Lingala, and of unamplified and amplified sound production, share similar features, yet they are evaluated differently in rural ‘hi-fi’ sonic environments.
“上帝会怎样听我们呢?”:金沙萨Églises黑人的声音和语言差异
本文研究了反基督教、“传统非洲”组织(在当地被称为Églises des Noirs)如何通过声音和语言策略在刚果首都的宗教竞争中导航。它关注的是未被充分研究的Mpadist社区,这是更知名的金班吉派教会的一个“持不同政见”的分支。Mpadists动员不同的欣赏和意义的声音和语言,把自己从占主导地位的Lingalaphone五旬节派响亮的城市。在这样做的过程中,他们在刚果传统主义(根植于殖民预言运动的精神合法性的来源)和“现代”社区建设策略之间寻求微妙的平衡,以便在金沙萨丰富的宗教环境中保持竞争力。本文认为,声音意识形态和语言意识形态以相似的方式运作和实现,因此应在同一关系中进行分析。因此,它建议扩大指数性的社会语言学概念,以纳入声音制作的音量和模式的元素。文章还表明,语音和语言意识形态受到语境的约束。在金沙萨的“低保真”音景中,基孔戈语和林加拉语的指数值,以及未放大和放大的声音制作的指数值具有相似的特征,但在农村的“高保真”音景中,它们的评估却不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信