Domestic Contestations against International Courts and Tribunals: Introduction to the Special Issue

IF 0.9 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW
Edouard Fromageau, M. Kanetake, Stephan Wittich, Andrea Gattini
{"title":"Domestic Contestations against International Courts and Tribunals: Introduction to the Special Issue","authors":"Edouard Fromageau, M. Kanetake, Stephan Wittich, Andrea Gattini","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idab016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Domestic authorities, including national courts, at times, resist accepting the decisions of international courts and tribunals. The formal division between the national and international legal orders creates space for domestic authorities to contest or avoid international binding judicial decisions. The present special issue examines domestic contestations in multiple fields of international law, including human rights and investment law. In contesting some of the international decisions, domestic authorities invoke a wide range of legal bases in resisting the effect of international decisions. The contributions in the present issue examine various such argumentative bases of contestations. The contributions also consider whether domestic resistance could give rise to the opportunity for international courts and tribunals to critically reflect on their own decisions and underlying reasoning.","PeriodicalId":44660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idab016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Domestic authorities, including national courts, at times, resist accepting the decisions of international courts and tribunals. The formal division between the national and international legal orders creates space for domestic authorities to contest or avoid international binding judicial decisions. The present special issue examines domestic contestations in multiple fields of international law, including human rights and investment law. In contesting some of the international decisions, domestic authorities invoke a wide range of legal bases in resisting the effect of international decisions. The contributions in the present issue examine various such argumentative bases of contestations. The contributions also consider whether domestic resistance could give rise to the opportunity for international courts and tribunals to critically reflect on their own decisions and underlying reasoning.
针对国际法院和法庭的国内争端:特刊导言
国内当局,包括国家法院,有时拒绝接受国际法院和法庭的裁决。国家和国际法律秩序之间的正式划分为国内当局争辩或避免具有国际约束力的司法决定创造了空间。本期特刊审查了包括人权和投资法在内的国际法多个领域的国内争端。在对一些国际决定提出异议时,国内当局援引广泛的法律依据来抵制国际决定的影响。本期的文章考察了各种争论的论证基础。报告还考虑到国内的阻力是否会给国际法院和法庭提供机会,批判性地反思它们自己的决定和基本推理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信