The Ethical Implications of Big Data Research in Public Health: “Big Data Ethics by Design” in the UK-REACH Study

Q2 Social Sciences
Ruby Reed-Berendt, Edward S. Dove, Manish Pareek, UK-REACH Study Collaborative Group
{"title":"The Ethical Implications of Big Data Research in Public Health: “Big Data Ethics by Design” in the UK-REACH Study","authors":"Ruby Reed-Berendt,&nbsp;Edward S. Dove,&nbsp;Manish Pareek,&nbsp;UK-REACH Study Collaborative Group","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In this article, we analyze legal and ethical issues raised in Big Data health research projects in the Covid-19 era and consider how these issues might be addressed in ways that advance positive values (e.g., furtherance of respect for persons and accordance with relevant legal frameworks) while mitigating or eliminating any negative aspects (e.g., exacerbation of social inequality and injustice). We apply this analysis specifically to UK-REACH (The United Kingdom Research Study into Ethnicity and Covid-19 Outcomes in Healthcare Workers), a project with which we are involved. We argue that Big Data projects like UK-REACH can be conducted in an ethically robust manner and that funders and sponsors ought to encourage similar projects to drive better evidence-based public policy in public health. As part of this, we advocate that a <i>Big Data ethics-by-design</i> approach be undertaken when such projects are constructed. This principle extends the work of those who advocate ethics by design by addressing prominent issues in Big Data health research projects; it holds that ethical values and principles in Big Data health research projects are best adhered to when they are already integrated into the project aims and methods at the design stage. In advocating this principle, we present a unique perspective regarding pressing ethical problems around large-scale, data-driven Covid-19 research, as well as legal issues associated with processing ostensibly anonymized health data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"44 1","pages":"2-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eahr.500111","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & human research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eahr.500111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In this article, we analyze legal and ethical issues raised in Big Data health research projects in the Covid-19 era and consider how these issues might be addressed in ways that advance positive values (e.g., furtherance of respect for persons and accordance with relevant legal frameworks) while mitigating or eliminating any negative aspects (e.g., exacerbation of social inequality and injustice). We apply this analysis specifically to UK-REACH (The United Kingdom Research Study into Ethnicity and Covid-19 Outcomes in Healthcare Workers), a project with which we are involved. We argue that Big Data projects like UK-REACH can be conducted in an ethically robust manner and that funders and sponsors ought to encourage similar projects to drive better evidence-based public policy in public health. As part of this, we advocate that a Big Data ethics-by-design approach be undertaken when such projects are constructed. This principle extends the work of those who advocate ethics by design by addressing prominent issues in Big Data health research projects; it holds that ethical values and principles in Big Data health research projects are best adhered to when they are already integrated into the project aims and methods at the design stage. In advocating this principle, we present a unique perspective regarding pressing ethical problems around large-scale, data-driven Covid-19 research, as well as legal issues associated with processing ostensibly anonymized health data.

公共卫生大数据研究的伦理意义:英国reach研究中的“设计大数据伦理”
在本文中,我们分析了Covid-19时代大数据健康研究项目中提出的法律和伦理问题,并考虑如何以促进积极价值观(例如,促进对人的尊重并遵守相关法律框架)的方式解决这些问题,同时减轻或消除任何负面影响(例如,加剧社会不平等和不公正)。我们专门将这一分析应用于UK-REACH(英国医疗工作者种族和Covid-19结果研究),这是我们参与的一个项目。我们认为,像UK-REACH这样的大数据项目可以在道德上稳健地进行,资助者和赞助商应该鼓励类似的项目,以推动更好的基于证据的公共卫生公共政策。作为其中的一部分,我们主张在建设此类项目时采用大数据设计伦理方法。这一原则通过解决大数据健康研究项目中的突出问题,扩展了那些倡导设计伦理的人的工作;认为在大数据健康研究项目中,伦理价值观和原则在设计阶段就已经融入到项目目标和方法中,是最能坚持的。在倡导这一原则的过程中,我们提出了一个独特的视角,来看待围绕大规模、数据驱动的Covid-19研究的紧迫伦理问题,以及与处理表面上匿名的健康数据相关的法律问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethics & human research
Ethics & human research Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信