Doing research on ‘sensitive topics’: Studying the Sweden–South Africa Arms Deal

W. Coetzee
{"title":"Doing research on ‘sensitive topics’: Studying the Sweden–South Africa Arms Deal","authors":"W. Coetzee","doi":"10.5787/48-2-1278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conventional arms trade is a sensitive topic that is often shrouded in secrecy. As with most aspects of so-called ‘high politics’, processes connected to conventional arms trade habitually take place behind closed doors between a relatively small and tightly knit group of individuals. Gaining access to such people is an enormous challenge for any researcher. Moreover, building rapport with key decision-makers takes a long time, and it requires considerable effort and resolve. This article recapitulates the approach and method of a study done on conventional Swedish arms trade with South Africa. It provides insights into several substantive issues related to such research, in particular, aspects connected to elite interviewing and research ethics. The bulk of the article covers matters related to research design, access to elites, the limitations associated with elite interviewing, and the interview process that was adopted during fieldwork.  The discussion on research ethics is closely, but not exclusively, connected to elite interviewing, and here the article reflects on various ethical considerations as well as the harsh reality of researching sensitive topics, such as conventional arms trade.","PeriodicalId":53024,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Militaria","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Militaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5787/48-2-1278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The conventional arms trade is a sensitive topic that is often shrouded in secrecy. As with most aspects of so-called ‘high politics’, processes connected to conventional arms trade habitually take place behind closed doors between a relatively small and tightly knit group of individuals. Gaining access to such people is an enormous challenge for any researcher. Moreover, building rapport with key decision-makers takes a long time, and it requires considerable effort and resolve. This article recapitulates the approach and method of a study done on conventional Swedish arms trade with South Africa. It provides insights into several substantive issues related to such research, in particular, aspects connected to elite interviewing and research ethics. The bulk of the article covers matters related to research design, access to elites, the limitations associated with elite interviewing, and the interview process that was adopted during fieldwork.  The discussion on research ethics is closely, but not exclusively, connected to elite interviewing, and here the article reflects on various ethical considerations as well as the harsh reality of researching sensitive topics, such as conventional arms trade.
对“敏感话题”进行研究:研究瑞典-南非武器交易
常规武器贸易是一个经常被保密的敏感话题。与所谓的“高级政治”的大多数方面一样,与常规武器贸易有关的过程通常是在一个相对较小的、关系紧密的个人团体之间闭门不出地进行的。对任何研究人员来说,接触到这些人都是一个巨大的挑战。此外,与关键决策者建立融洽关系需要很长时间,需要相当大的努力和决心。本文概述了对瑞典与南非的常规武器贸易进行的一项研究的途径和方法。它提供了与此类研究相关的几个实质性问题的见解,特别是与精英访谈和研究伦理有关的方面。文章的大部分内容涵盖了与研究设计、精英访问、精英访谈相关的限制以及在实地工作中采用的访谈过程有关的问题。关于研究伦理的讨论与精英访谈密切相关,但并非完全相关,在这里,文章反映了各种伦理考虑以及研究敏感话题(如常规武器贸易)的残酷现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信