Quality indicators in colonoscopy: observational study in a supplementary health system.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Rogerio Kuga, Marcio Roberto Facanali Junior, Everson Luiz de Almeida Artifon
{"title":"Quality indicators in colonoscopy: observational study in a supplementary health system.","authors":"Rogerio Kuga,&nbsp;Marcio Roberto Facanali Junior,&nbsp;Everson Luiz de Almeida Artifon","doi":"10.1590/acb371106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Colorectal cancer is responsible for 9.4% of cancer deaths, and low polyp detection rate and cecal intubation rate increase the risks of interval colorectal cancer. Despite several population studies that address colonoscopy quality measures, there is still a shortage of these studies in Latin America. The aim of this study was to assess quality indicators in colonoscopy, enabling future strategies to improve colorectal cancer prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational retrospective study, in which all colonoscopies performed in 11 hospitals were evaluated through a review of medical records. Information such as procedure indication, colorectal polyp detection rate, cecal intubation rate, quality of colonic preparation, and immediate adverse events were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 17,448 colonoscopies performed by 86 endoscopists, 57.9% were in patients aged 50 to 74 years old. Colon preparation was adequate in 94.4% procedures, with rates of cecal intubation and polyp detection of 94 and 36.6%, respectively. Acute adverse events occurred in 0.2%. In 53.9%, high-definition imaging equipment was used. The procedure location, colon preparation and high-definition equipment influenced polyp detection rates (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The extraction and analysis of electronic medical records showed that there are opportunities for improvement in colonoscopy quality indicators in the participating hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":6992,"journal":{"name":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","volume":"37 11","pages":"e371106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9829243/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/acb371106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Colorectal cancer is responsible for 9.4% of cancer deaths, and low polyp detection rate and cecal intubation rate increase the risks of interval colorectal cancer. Despite several population studies that address colonoscopy quality measures, there is still a shortage of these studies in Latin America. The aim of this study was to assess quality indicators in colonoscopy, enabling future strategies to improve colorectal cancer prevention.

Methods: An observational retrospective study, in which all colonoscopies performed in 11 hospitals were evaluated through a review of medical records. Information such as procedure indication, colorectal polyp detection rate, cecal intubation rate, quality of colonic preparation, and immediate adverse events were collected and analyzed.

Results: In 17,448 colonoscopies performed by 86 endoscopists, 57.9% were in patients aged 50 to 74 years old. Colon preparation was adequate in 94.4% procedures, with rates of cecal intubation and polyp detection of 94 and 36.6%, respectively. Acute adverse events occurred in 0.2%. In 53.9%, high-definition imaging equipment was used. The procedure location, colon preparation and high-definition equipment influenced polyp detection rates (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The extraction and analysis of electronic medical records showed that there are opportunities for improvement in colonoscopy quality indicators in the participating hospitals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

结肠镜检查的质量指标:辅助卫生系统的观察性研究。
目的:结直肠癌占癌症死亡的9.4%,低息肉检出率和盲肠插管率增加了间期结直肠癌的发生风险。尽管有几项人口研究涉及结肠镜检查质量措施,但拉丁美洲仍然缺乏这些研究。本研究的目的是评估结肠镜检查的质量指标,为未来改善结直肠癌预防提供策略。方法:对11家医院的结肠镜检查病例进行回顾性分析。收集并分析手术适应证、结肠息肉检出率、盲肠插管率、结肠准备质量和即时不良事件等信息。结果:86名内镜医师进行的17448例结肠镜检查中,57.9%的患者年龄在50 ~ 74岁之间。在94.4%的手术中,结肠准备是充分的,盲肠插管和息肉检出率分别为94%和36.6%。急性不良事件发生率为0.2%。53.9%的患者使用高清成像设备。手术位置、结肠准备和高清设备影响息肉检出率(p < 0.001)。结论:通过对电子病历的提取和分析,参与医院结肠镜检查质量指标有提高的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
60
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信