Colchicine is an effective therapeutic agent in erosive hand osteoarthritis

Adem Ertürk, Alper Sarı
{"title":"Colchicine is an effective therapeutic agent in erosive hand osteoarthritis","authors":"Adem Ertürk, Alper Sarı","doi":"10.28982/josam.7857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aim: The efficacy of colchicine has been assessed in hand osteoarthritis; however, no studies have investigated its use in the more severe subtype of hand osteoarthritis, known as erosive hand osteoarthritis (EHOA). This retrospective cohort study investigated whether colchicine therapy could provide symptomatic relief and improve inflammation markers in patients with EHOA.\nMethods: The study included a total of 43 EHOA patients using colchicine (2×0.5 mg) + paracetamol (3×500 mg) daily (colchicine group) and 43 EHOA patients using only paracetamol (3×500 mg) (standard therapy group). Both groups were evaluated for various parameters.\nResults: The groups were similar in terms of age, sex distribution, and other sociodemographic variables. The decreases in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels from baseline were significantly greater in the colchicine group (P<0.001). Additionally, the visual analog scale (VAS) and Australian Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN) scores, which include pain, stiffness, function, and total score, were significantly better in the colchicine group at 3 months compared to the standard therapy group (P<0.001). Furthermore, although both groups showed significant improvements in these parameters, the amount of improvement was significantly greater in the colchicine group (P<0.001).\nConclusion: The combined use of colchicine and paracetamol improved CRP and ESR levels, VAS score, and all AUSCAN scores in patients with EHOA. Moreover, these benefits were significantly greater than standard therapy with paracetamol alone. Colchicine appears to be an effective therapeutic agent in the treatment of EHOA.","PeriodicalId":30878,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery and Medicine","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.7857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Aim: The efficacy of colchicine has been assessed in hand osteoarthritis; however, no studies have investigated its use in the more severe subtype of hand osteoarthritis, known as erosive hand osteoarthritis (EHOA). This retrospective cohort study investigated whether colchicine therapy could provide symptomatic relief and improve inflammation markers in patients with EHOA. Methods: The study included a total of 43 EHOA patients using colchicine (2×0.5 mg) + paracetamol (3×500 mg) daily (colchicine group) and 43 EHOA patients using only paracetamol (3×500 mg) (standard therapy group). Both groups were evaluated for various parameters. Results: The groups were similar in terms of age, sex distribution, and other sociodemographic variables. The decreases in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels from baseline were significantly greater in the colchicine group (P<0.001). Additionally, the visual analog scale (VAS) and Australian Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN) scores, which include pain, stiffness, function, and total score, were significantly better in the colchicine group at 3 months compared to the standard therapy group (P<0.001). Furthermore, although both groups showed significant improvements in these parameters, the amount of improvement was significantly greater in the colchicine group (P<0.001). Conclusion: The combined use of colchicine and paracetamol improved CRP and ESR levels, VAS score, and all AUSCAN scores in patients with EHOA. Moreover, these benefits were significantly greater than standard therapy with paracetamol alone. Colchicine appears to be an effective therapeutic agent in the treatment of EHOA.
秋水仙碱是治疗糜烂性手骨关节炎的有效药物
背景/目的:观察秋水仙碱治疗手部骨关节炎的疗效;然而,没有研究调查其在更严重的手骨关节炎亚型,即糜烂性手骨关节炎(EHOA)中的应用。本回顾性队列研究探讨秋水仙碱治疗是否能缓解EHOA患者的症状并改善炎症标志物。方法:研究共纳入43例每日使用秋水仙碱(2×0.5 mg) +扑热息痛(3×500 mg)的EHOA患者(秋水仙碱组)和43例仅使用扑热息痛(3×500 mg)的EHOA患者(标准治疗组)。对两组进行各项参数评估。结果:两组在年龄、性别分布和其他社会人口学变量方面相似。秋水仙碱组红细胞沉降率(ESR)和c反应蛋白(CRP)水平较基线显著降低(P<0.001)。此外,视觉模拟量表(VAS)和澳大利亚-加拿大骨关节炎手部指数(AUSCAN)评分,包括疼痛、僵硬、功能和总分,秋水草碱组在3个月时明显优于标准治疗组(P<0.001)。此外,尽管两组在这些参数上均有显著改善,但秋水仙碱组的改善幅度明显更大(P<0.001)。结论:秋水仙碱联合扑热息痛可改善EHOA患者CRP、ESR水平、VAS评分及所有AUSCAN评分。此外,这些益处明显大于单独使用扑热息痛的标准治疗。秋水仙碱是治疗EHOA的有效药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信