Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: learning curves and outcomes from an Australian perspective

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Sachin Perera , Nadil Fernando , Jonathan O'Brien , Declan Murphy , Nathan Lawrentschuk
{"title":"Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: learning curves and outcomes from an Australian perspective","authors":"Sachin Perera ,&nbsp;Nadil Fernando ,&nbsp;Jonathan O'Brien ,&nbsp;Declan Murphy ,&nbsp;Nathan Lawrentschuk","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2022.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been a treatment for men who suffer from intermediated to high-risk prostate cancer in Australia since 2003. The primary outcomes in relation to learning curves in robotic surgery have been extensively researched in overseas populations, but there is no study from a cohort of Australian surgeons performing RARP. This study aims to highlight the effect of RARP learning curves on primary surgical outcomes in a high-volume Australian centre.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective audit of all RARP performed at Epworth Healthcare from 2016 to 2021 was performed. The primary outcome data collected included operating time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), and positive surgical margins (PSM). Exclusion criteria were applied. Positive outcomes were set at OT 240 min, blood loss 310 mL, and negative surgical margins.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 3969 cases were analysed for a cohort of 53 surgeons. Of these surgeons, 24 surgeons have performed &gt;50 operations to be able to undergo learning curve analysis. The median OT was 229 min, the median blood loss was 353 mL, and most cases had negative surgical margins (&gt;1 mm, <em>n</em> = 3681, 92.7%). The mean learning curve transition point was 65 cases. There was a significant difference in the EBL and rate of PSM for the higher volume cohort (p = 0.002 and &lt;0.0001, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We perform a retrospective study of all RARP performed at a high-volume Australian centre. Higher volume surgeons demonstrate that primary outcomes improve with a higher caseload (EBL, PSM). Learning curve transition points for RARP are comparable to international high-volume surgeons. Learning curve data could form the benchmark for RARP training and skills development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/94/d4/main.PMC9995681.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888222000630","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been a treatment for men who suffer from intermediated to high-risk prostate cancer in Australia since 2003. The primary outcomes in relation to learning curves in robotic surgery have been extensively researched in overseas populations, but there is no study from a cohort of Australian surgeons performing RARP. This study aims to highlight the effect of RARP learning curves on primary surgical outcomes in a high-volume Australian centre.

Methods

A retrospective audit of all RARP performed at Epworth Healthcare from 2016 to 2021 was performed. The primary outcome data collected included operating time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), and positive surgical margins (PSM). Exclusion criteria were applied. Positive outcomes were set at OT 240 min, blood loss 310 mL, and negative surgical margins.

Results

A total of 3969 cases were analysed for a cohort of 53 surgeons. Of these surgeons, 24 surgeons have performed >50 operations to be able to undergo learning curve analysis. The median OT was 229 min, the median blood loss was 353 mL, and most cases had negative surgical margins (>1 mm, n = 3681, 92.7%). The mean learning curve transition point was 65 cases. There was a significant difference in the EBL and rate of PSM for the higher volume cohort (p = 0.002 and <0.0001, respectively).

Conclusion

We perform a retrospective study of all RARP performed at a high-volume Australian centre. Higher volume surgeons demonstrate that primary outcomes improve with a higher caseload (EBL, PSM). Learning curve transition points for RARP are comparable to international high-volume surgeons. Learning curve data could form the benchmark for RARP training and skills development.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

机器人辅助前列腺根治术:澳大利亚视角下的学习曲线和结果
背景自2003年以来,Robot-assisted根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)一直是澳大利亚中高风险前列腺癌患者的一种治疗方法。机器人手术中与学习曲线相关的主要结果已在海外人群中进行了广泛研究,但没有来自执行RARP的澳大利亚外科医生队列的研究。本研究旨在强调RARP学习曲线对大容量澳大利亚中心初级手术结果的影响。方法对2016年至2021年在Epworth Healthcare进行的所有RARP进行回顾性审计。收集的主要结果数据包括手术时间(OT)、估计失血量(EBL)和阳性手术切缘(PSM)。应用了排除标准。阳性结果设定为OT 240分钟,失血310毫升,手术切缘为阴性。结果53名外科医生共分析了3969例病例。在这些外科医生中,24名外科医生进行了>;50次操作,以便能够进行学习曲线分析。中位OT为229分钟,中位失血量为353毫升,大多数病例的手术切缘为阴性(>1毫米,n=3681,92.7%)。平均学习曲线过渡点为65例。高容量队列的EBL和PSM发生率存在显著差异(分别为p=0.002和<;0.0001)。结论我们对在澳大利亚高容量中心进行的所有RARP进行了回顾性研究。手术量越大的外科医生证明,随着病例数量的增加(EBL,PSM),主要结果会改善。RARP的学习曲线过渡点与国际大容量外科医生相当。学习曲线数据可以形成RARP培训和技能发展的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prostate International
Prostate International Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
26.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Prostate International (Prostate Int, PI), the official English-language journal of Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS), is an international peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to basic and clinical studies on prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostatitis, and ...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信