Reviws & Notices India

IF 0.6 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
J. Bandyopadhyaya
{"title":"Reviws & Notices India","authors":"J. Bandyopadhyaya","doi":"10.1177/0974928419650206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"These two publications are not books written by Dr. Lohia, but collections of his speeches and ·writings. In his Preface to Marx, Gandhi and Socialism. Dr. Lohia explains that with the best of efforts one can discover or prove only an aspect of truth and not the whole of it, and that, therefore, it makes little difference whether one's views arc expressed in the form of a closely reasoned book or a collection of speeches and writings. One may or may not entirely accept this view, but the two books do reveal a general trend of argument and considerable originality of thought. As could he expected in such cases, there arc frequent repetitions and the mixing up of incidental matters with central points. But once one has laboriously gone through the volumes and discovered the main thread of reasoning, one cannot but be struck by the sheer brilliance of many of the arguments, the depth of thought and the tremendous humanist zeal which must have inspired them. In Marx, Gandhi and Socialism Dr. Lohia, broadly accepts the Marxist prognosis of capitalism as applied /to England and Germany of Marx's time and regards Marx as basically a democrat. :Marx did not think about the economicallv backward countries in formulating his.theories and Marxism, therefore, did not apply to such countries. The author regards the assault on the institution of private property as the greatest contribution of Marxism, apparently forgetting that the assault on private property was first launched not by Marx or the Marxists, but by pre-Marxian and nonMarxist anarchists like Winstanley, Godwin, Proudhon and Bakunin. However, the author believes that Marxism was distorted by Lenin and other Russian Communists and that Communism as government has been a great deviation from Marxism. Theoretically, he utterly rejects Communism because \"It is impossible to adtleve the victory of truth","PeriodicalId":43647,"journal":{"name":"India Quarterly-A Journal of International Affairs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"1965-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"India Quarterly-A Journal of International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0974928419650206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

These two publications are not books written by Dr. Lohia, but collections of his speeches and ·writings. In his Preface to Marx, Gandhi and Socialism. Dr. Lohia explains that with the best of efforts one can discover or prove only an aspect of truth and not the whole of it, and that, therefore, it makes little difference whether one's views arc expressed in the form of a closely reasoned book or a collection of speeches and writings. One may or may not entirely accept this view, but the two books do reveal a general trend of argument and considerable originality of thought. As could he expected in such cases, there arc frequent repetitions and the mixing up of incidental matters with central points. But once one has laboriously gone through the volumes and discovered the main thread of reasoning, one cannot but be struck by the sheer brilliance of many of the arguments, the depth of thought and the tremendous humanist zeal which must have inspired them. In Marx, Gandhi and Socialism Dr. Lohia, broadly accepts the Marxist prognosis of capitalism as applied /to England and Germany of Marx's time and regards Marx as basically a democrat. :Marx did not think about the economicallv backward countries in formulating his.theories and Marxism, therefore, did not apply to such countries. The author regards the assault on the institution of private property as the greatest contribution of Marxism, apparently forgetting that the assault on private property was first launched not by Marx or the Marxists, but by pre-Marxian and nonMarxist anarchists like Winstanley, Godwin, Proudhon and Bakunin. However, the author believes that Marxism was distorted by Lenin and other Russian Communists and that Communism as government has been a great deviation from Marxism. Theoretically, he utterly rejects Communism because "It is impossible to adtleve the victory of truth
评论和通知印度
这两本出版物不是洛希亚博士写的书,而是他的演讲和著作的合集。在《马克思、甘地与社会主义》的序言中。洛希亚博士解释说,尽最大努力,一个人只能发现或证明真理的一个方面,而不是全部,因此,一个人的观点是以一本缜密的书的形式表达,还是以一系列演讲和著作的形式表达,都没有什么区别。人们可能完全接受,也可能不完全接受这种观点,但这两本书确实揭示了一种普遍的争论趋势和相当大的思想独创性。正如他所预料的那样,在这种情况下,经常会有重复,并且把次要的事情和中心的事情混为一谈。但是,一旦一个人费力地读完这些书,发现了推理的主线,他就会被其中许多论点的光辉、思想的深度和激发他们的巨大的人文主义热情所震撼。在《马克思、甘地和社会主义》一书中,洛希亚博士广泛接受马克思主义对资本主义的预测,将其应用于马克思时代的英国和德国,并认为马克思基本上是一个民主主义者。马克思在阐述他的理论时没有考虑到经济落后的国家。因此,理论和马克思主义不适用于这些国家。作者认为对私有财产制度的攻击是马克思主义的最大贡献,显然忘记了对私有财产的攻击首先不是由马克思或马克思主义者发起的,而是由温斯坦利、戈德温、普鲁东和巴库宁等前马克思主义和非马克思主义的无政府主义者发起的。然而,作者认为马克思主义被列宁和其他俄国共产主义者扭曲了,共产主义作为政府已经大大偏离了马克思主义。从理论上讲,他完全拒绝共产主义,因为“真理的胜利是不可能解决的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信