K. Jones, Kathleen A. Johnson, Lyn M. Dick, R. Felix, K. Kao, C. Chambers
{"title":"Pregnancy outcomes after first trimester exposure to phentermine/fenfluramine.","authors":"K. Jones, Kathleen A. Johnson, Lyn M. Dick, R. Felix, K. Kao, C. Chambers","doi":"10.1002/TERA.10023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nFenfluramine was withdrawn from the U.S. market in 1997 because of its association with cardiac-valve abnormalities in adults. The combination of fenfluramine and phentermine had been widely used to promote weight loss, and many women were inadvertently exposed during the first trimester of pregnancy. The possible effect on the developing fetus has not been studied.\n\n\nMETHODS\nControlled prospective cohort study comparing 98 women who had taken phentermine/fenfluramine to 233 women who had not, all of whom contacted the California Teratogen Information Service during pregnancy.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe proportion of liveborn infants with major structural anomalies was similar in the two groups (3.6% vs. 1.0%, relative risk (RR) 3.59; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61, 21.10), as was the proportion of infants with >or=3 minor anomalies (11.7% vs. 7.6%, RR 1.53; 95% CI 0.61, 3.82). Furthermore, no pattern of malformation was identified. There were no significant differences between the groups in spontaneous pregnancy loss (6.1% vs. 8.2%, P = 0.65) or premature delivery (8.6% vs. 7.7%, P = 0.95). Birth weight and head circumference were significantly increased in the exposed group; however, these differences were not associated with anorexiant use itself. The rate of gestational diabetes was significantly increased in pregnant women who took phentermine/fenfluramine during the first trimester of pregnancy.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nAlthough it is not possible from this study to rule out weak to moderate associations, the lack of an increased risk of spontaneous pregnancy loss, and major or minor anomalies in the offspring of women who took phentermine/fenfluramine at the recommended daily dose during the first trimester of pregnancy is reassuring.","PeriodicalId":22211,"journal":{"name":"Teratology","volume":"48 1","pages":"125-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teratology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/TERA.10023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Fenfluramine was withdrawn from the U.S. market in 1997 because of its association with cardiac-valve abnormalities in adults. The combination of fenfluramine and phentermine had been widely used to promote weight loss, and many women were inadvertently exposed during the first trimester of pregnancy. The possible effect on the developing fetus has not been studied.
METHODS
Controlled prospective cohort study comparing 98 women who had taken phentermine/fenfluramine to 233 women who had not, all of whom contacted the California Teratogen Information Service during pregnancy.
RESULTS
The proportion of liveborn infants with major structural anomalies was similar in the two groups (3.6% vs. 1.0%, relative risk (RR) 3.59; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61, 21.10), as was the proportion of infants with >or=3 minor anomalies (11.7% vs. 7.6%, RR 1.53; 95% CI 0.61, 3.82). Furthermore, no pattern of malformation was identified. There were no significant differences between the groups in spontaneous pregnancy loss (6.1% vs. 8.2%, P = 0.65) or premature delivery (8.6% vs. 7.7%, P = 0.95). Birth weight and head circumference were significantly increased in the exposed group; however, these differences were not associated with anorexiant use itself. The rate of gestational diabetes was significantly increased in pregnant women who took phentermine/fenfluramine during the first trimester of pregnancy.
CONCLUSIONS
Although it is not possible from this study to rule out weak to moderate associations, the lack of an increased risk of spontaneous pregnancy loss, and major or minor anomalies in the offspring of women who took phentermine/fenfluramine at the recommended daily dose during the first trimester of pregnancy is reassuring.
背景:芬氟拉明因与成人心脏瓣膜异常相关,于1997年从美国市场撤出。芬氟拉明和芬特明的组合曾被广泛用于促进减肥,许多妇女在怀孕的前三个月无意中接触到这种药物。对发育中的胎儿可能产生的影响尚未得到研究。方法:对照前瞻性队列研究比较了98名服用芬特明/芬氟拉明的妇女和233名未服用芬特明的妇女,这些妇女都在怀孕期间联系了加州致畸原信息服务中心。结果两组存在重大结构异常的活产婴儿比例相似(3.6% vs. 1.0%,相对危险度(RR) 3.59;95%可信区间(CI) 0.61, 21.10),以及>或=3个轻微异常的婴儿比例(11.7% vs. 7.6%, RR 1.53;95% ci 0.61, 3.82)。此外,没有发现畸形的模式。两组间自然流产(6.1% vs. 8.2%, P = 0.65)和早产(8.6% vs. 7.7%, P = 0.95)的发生率无显著差异。暴露组新生儿出生体重、头围显著增加;然而,这些差异与使用厌食症本身无关。妊娠前三个月服用芬特明/芬氟拉明的孕妇患妊娠糖尿病的几率显著增加。结论:虽然本研究不能排除弱到中度的相关性,但在妊娠早期服用芬特明/芬氟拉明的妇女,其后代没有增加的自然流产风险,也没有出现或大或小的异常,这是令人放心的。