Multi-Class Brain Tumor Segmentation via 3d and 2d Neural Networks

Sergey Pnev, V. Groza, B. Tuchinov, E. Amelina, Evgeny Nikolaevich Pavlovskiy, N. Tolstokulakov, M. Amelin, S. Golushko, A. Letyagin
{"title":"Multi-Class Brain Tumor Segmentation via 3d and 2d Neural Networks","authors":"Sergey Pnev, V. Groza, B. Tuchinov, E. Amelina, Evgeny Nikolaevich Pavlovskiy, N. Tolstokulakov, M. Amelin, S. Golushko, A. Letyagin","doi":"10.1109/ISBI52829.2022.9761538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Brain tumor segmentation is an important and time-consuming part of the usual clinical diagnosis process. Multi-class segmentation of different tumor types is a challenging task, due to the differences in shape, size, location and scanner parameters. Many 2D and 3D convolution neural network architectures have been proposed to address this problem achieving a significant success. It is well known that 2D approach is generally faster and more popular in the most of such problems. However, the usage of 3D models allows us to simultaneously improve the quality of segmentation. Accounting the context along the sagittal plane leads to the learning of 3-dimensional features that we used for computationally expensive 3D operations what in its turn increases the learning time as well as decreases the speed of operation.In this paper, we compare the 2D and 3D approaches on 2 datasets with MRI images: the one from the BraTS 2020 competition and a private Siberian Brain tumor dataset. In each dataset, any single scan is represented by 4 sequences T1, T1C, T2 and T2-Flair, annotated by two certified neuro-radiologist specialists. The datasets differ from each other in the dimension, grade set and tumor type. Numerical comparison was performed based on the Dice score index. We provide the case by case analysis for the samples that caused most difficulties for the models. The results obtained in our work demonstrate the significant over performing of 3D methods keeping robustness in a regard of data source and type that allow us to get a little closer to AI-assisted diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":6827,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)","volume":"72 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI52829.2022.9761538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brain tumor segmentation is an important and time-consuming part of the usual clinical diagnosis process. Multi-class segmentation of different tumor types is a challenging task, due to the differences in shape, size, location and scanner parameters. Many 2D and 3D convolution neural network architectures have been proposed to address this problem achieving a significant success. It is well known that 2D approach is generally faster and more popular in the most of such problems. However, the usage of 3D models allows us to simultaneously improve the quality of segmentation. Accounting the context along the sagittal plane leads to the learning of 3-dimensional features that we used for computationally expensive 3D operations what in its turn increases the learning time as well as decreases the speed of operation.In this paper, we compare the 2D and 3D approaches on 2 datasets with MRI images: the one from the BraTS 2020 competition and a private Siberian Brain tumor dataset. In each dataset, any single scan is represented by 4 sequences T1, T1C, T2 and T2-Flair, annotated by two certified neuro-radiologist specialists. The datasets differ from each other in the dimension, grade set and tumor type. Numerical comparison was performed based on the Dice score index. We provide the case by case analysis for the samples that caused most difficulties for the models. The results obtained in our work demonstrate the significant over performing of 3D methods keeping robustness in a regard of data source and type that allow us to get a little closer to AI-assisted diagnosis.
基于三维和二维神经网络的多类脑肿瘤分割
脑肿瘤的分割是临床诊断过程中一个重要而耗时的环节。由于形状、大小、位置和扫描仪参数的差异,对不同类型的肿瘤进行多类分割是一项具有挑战性的任务。许多二维和三维卷积神经网络架构已经被提出来解决这个问题,并取得了显著的成功。众所周知,在大多数此类问题中,2D方法通常更快,更受欢迎。然而,3D模型的使用使我们能够同时提高分割质量。计算沿矢状面的上下文导致我们用于计算昂贵的3D操作的三维特征的学习,这反过来增加了学习时间并降低了操作速度。在本文中,我们比较了2个数据集上的2D和3D方法与MRI图像:来自BraTS 2020比赛的数据集和私人西伯利亚脑肿瘤数据集。在每个数据集中,任何单次扫描都由T1、T1C、T2和T2- flair 4个序列表示,并由两名经过认证的神经放射科专家注释。这些数据集在维度、分级集和肿瘤类型上各不相同。根据Dice评分指数进行数值比较。我们对造成模型最大困难的样品进行个案分析。在我们的工作中获得的结果表明,3D方法在数据源和类型方面保持了鲁棒性,使我们能够更接近人工智能辅助诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信