{"title":"A comparative study on microleakage of two low shrinkage composite materials in Class II cavities: A stereomicroscopic analysis.","authors":"Gifty Jacob, K Mallikarjun Goud","doi":"10.4103/jcd.jcd_444_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the microleakage of Filtek bulk fill posterior and Beautifil II LS composites in Class II cavities using stereomicroscope.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 34 extracted teeth were randomly divided into two groups. Teeth were prepared and mounted on a plaster block. In each tooth, Class II cavities were prepared, following which the cavities were etched and bonded. In Group I, 17 teeth were restored with Filtek bulk fill posterior composite in bulk fill technique and in Group II, 17 teeth were restored with Beautifil II LS following manufacture's instructions. The samples were then thermocycled and then the tooth were immersed in 1% methylene blue for 24 h and were divided into two halves mesiodistally using a diamond disc at low speed. Then, all the sections were observed under a stereomicroscope at ×10 magnification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mann-Whitney U-test displayed a statistically significant higher mean rank among Filtek bulk fill group (mean rank = 23.09) when compared to Beautifil II LS composite group (mean rank = 11.91).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concluded that in Class II restorations, Beautifil II LS showed significantly less microleakage than Filtek bulk fill posterior.</p>","PeriodicalId":38892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry","volume":"26 1","pages":"83-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003287/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_444_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To compare the microleakage of Filtek bulk fill posterior and Beautifil II LS composites in Class II cavities using stereomicroscope.
Materials and methods: A total of 34 extracted teeth were randomly divided into two groups. Teeth were prepared and mounted on a plaster block. In each tooth, Class II cavities were prepared, following which the cavities were etched and bonded. In Group I, 17 teeth were restored with Filtek bulk fill posterior composite in bulk fill technique and in Group II, 17 teeth were restored with Beautifil II LS following manufacture's instructions. The samples were then thermocycled and then the tooth were immersed in 1% methylene blue for 24 h and were divided into two halves mesiodistally using a diamond disc at low speed. Then, all the sections were observed under a stereomicroscope at ×10 magnification.
Results: Mann-Whitney U-test displayed a statistically significant higher mean rank among Filtek bulk fill group (mean rank = 23.09) when compared to Beautifil II LS composite group (mean rank = 11.91).
Conclusion: The study concluded that in Class II restorations, Beautifil II LS showed significantly less microleakage than Filtek bulk fill posterior.
目的:用立体显微镜比较Filtek大块填充后部和Beautifil II LS复合材料在II类空腔中的微渗漏。材料和方法:将34颗拔除的牙齿随机分为两组。牙齿已经准备好并安装在石膏块上。在每颗牙齿中,制备II类蛀牙,然后对蛀牙进行蚀刻和粘合。在第一组中,17颗牙齿采用Filtek大块充填-后部复合材料在大块充填技术中进行了修复,在第二组中,根据制造商的说明,用Beautifil II LS进行了17颗牙齿的修复。然后对样品进行热循环,然后将牙齿浸入1%亚甲蓝中24小时,并使用金刚石圆盘以低速将其分为两半。然后,在放大10倍的立体显微镜下观察所有切片。结果:与Beautifil II LS复合组(平均等级=11.91)相比,Filtek大块填充组的Mann-Whitney U型检验显示出统计学上显著更高的平均等级(平均等级=23.09)。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Conservative Dentistry (ISSN - 0972-0707) is the official journal of the Indian Association of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics (IACDE). Our journal publishes scientific articles, case reports, short communications, invited reviews and comparative studies evaluating materials and methods in the fields of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Materials and Endodontics. J Conserv Dent has a diverse readership that includes full-time clinicians, full-time academicians, residents, students and scientists. Effective communication with this diverse readership requires careful attention to writing style.