Taking a shower with a raincoat on women’s views on male condom use

I. Younis, M. Ibrahim, D. M. Elhabak
{"title":"Taking a shower with a raincoat on women’s views on male condom use","authors":"I. Younis, M. Ibrahim, D. M. Elhabak","doi":"10.21608/ha.2019.11891.1042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Condom use within marriage could be an important contraceptive strategy, but there is considerable debate about whether married couples would be willing to use condoms.  Aim of the Study: Evaluation of the effect of condom use on female sexual functions. Also, acceptability of both partners to this method will be assessed.  Materials and Methods: A total of 200 married women who experienced male condom use by their husbands were enrolled in this work. The tool used in this study was a self-report questionnaire written in English and translated into Arabic to ensure it is understood by all subjects regardless of their level of education.  Results: With condom use, desire level prior to sexual relationship was moderate in 38% of participants. Half of the respondents had moderate degree of lubrication while only 36% kept lubrication during the whole coitus on using condom. Condom had a negative effect on orgasm frequency in 28% of respondents. Most participants thought that their sexual life would be better without condom use.Conclusion: A majority of women disliked male condoms. Unsatisfactory sex, slipped condom, vaginal dryness and pain were very common sexual side effects of condom use in our study.","PeriodicalId":13018,"journal":{"name":"Human Andrology","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Andrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ha.2019.11891.1042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Condom use within marriage could be an important contraceptive strategy, but there is considerable debate about whether married couples would be willing to use condoms.  Aim of the Study: Evaluation of the effect of condom use on female sexual functions. Also, acceptability of both partners to this method will be assessed.  Materials and Methods: A total of 200 married women who experienced male condom use by their husbands were enrolled in this work. The tool used in this study was a self-report questionnaire written in English and translated into Arabic to ensure it is understood by all subjects regardless of their level of education.  Results: With condom use, desire level prior to sexual relationship was moderate in 38% of participants. Half of the respondents had moderate degree of lubrication while only 36% kept lubrication during the whole coitus on using condom. Condom had a negative effect on orgasm frequency in 28% of respondents. Most participants thought that their sexual life would be better without condom use.Conclusion: A majority of women disliked male condoms. Unsatisfactory sex, slipped condom, vaginal dryness and pain were very common sexual side effects of condom use in our study.
穿雨衣洗澡对女性使用男用避孕套的看法
在婚姻中使用避孕套可能是一种重要的避孕策略,但关于已婚夫妇是否愿意使用避孕套存在相当大的争议。研究目的:评价避孕套使用对女性性功能的影响。此外,将评估双方对该方法的可接受性。材料与方法:本研究共招募了200名经历过丈夫使用男用安全套的已婚妇女。本研究中使用的工具是一份用英语编写的自我报告问卷,并翻译成阿拉伯语,以确保所有受试者都能理解,无论他们的教育水平如何。结果:38%的参与者在使用避孕套后,发生性关系前的欲望水平是中等的。一半的受访者有适度的润滑,而只有36%的人在整个性交过程中使用避孕套保持润滑。28%的受访者认为避孕套对性高潮频率有负面影响。大多数参与者认为,如果不使用避孕套,他们的性生活会更好。结论:大多数女性不喜欢男用避孕套。在我们的研究中,不满意的性行为、滑脱避孕套、阴道干燥和疼痛是使用避孕套非常常见的性副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信