Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: current strategies and novel perspectives.

IF 4.2 3区 医学
Federica Borrelli de Andreis, Pietro Mascagni, Tommaso Schepis, Fabia Attili, Andrea Tringali, Guido Costamagna, Ivo Boškoski
{"title":"Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: current strategies and novel perspectives.","authors":"Federica Borrelli de Andreis,&nbsp;Pietro Mascagni,&nbsp;Tommaso Schepis,&nbsp;Fabia Attili,&nbsp;Andrea Tringali,&nbsp;Guido Costamagna,&nbsp;Ivo Boškoski","doi":"10.1177/17562848231155984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an advanced endoscopic procedure that might lead to severe adverse events. Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common post-procedural complication, which is related to significant mortality and increasing healthcare costs. Up to now, the prevalent approach to prevent PEP consisted of employing pharmacological and technical expedients that have been shown to improve post-ERCP outcomes, such as the administration of rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aggressive intravenous hydration, and the placement of a pancreatic stent. However, it has been reported that PEP originates from a more complex interaction of procedural and patient-related factors. Appropriate ERCP training has a pivotal role in PEP prevention strategy, and it is not a chance that a low PEP rate is universally considered one of the most relevant indicators of proficiency in ERCP. Scant data on the acquisition of skills during the ERCP training are currently available, although some efforts have been recently done to shorten the learning curve by way of simulation-based training and demonstrate competency by meeting technical requirements as well as adopting skill evaluation scales. Besides, the identification of adequate indications for ERCP and accurate pre-procedural risk stratification of patients might help to reduce PEP occurrence regardless of the endoscopist's technical abilities, and generally preserve safety in ERCP. This review aims at delineating current preventive strategies and highlighting novel perspectives for a safer ERCP focusing on the prevention of PEP.</p>","PeriodicalId":23022,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":"16 ","pages":"17562848231155984"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/28/45/10.1177_17562848231155984.PMC9989421.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848231155984","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an advanced endoscopic procedure that might lead to severe adverse events. Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common post-procedural complication, which is related to significant mortality and increasing healthcare costs. Up to now, the prevalent approach to prevent PEP consisted of employing pharmacological and technical expedients that have been shown to improve post-ERCP outcomes, such as the administration of rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aggressive intravenous hydration, and the placement of a pancreatic stent. However, it has been reported that PEP originates from a more complex interaction of procedural and patient-related factors. Appropriate ERCP training has a pivotal role in PEP prevention strategy, and it is not a chance that a low PEP rate is universally considered one of the most relevant indicators of proficiency in ERCP. Scant data on the acquisition of skills during the ERCP training are currently available, although some efforts have been recently done to shorten the learning curve by way of simulation-based training and demonstrate competency by meeting technical requirements as well as adopting skill evaluation scales. Besides, the identification of adequate indications for ERCP and accurate pre-procedural risk stratification of patients might help to reduce PEP occurrence regardless of the endoscopist's technical abilities, and generally preserve safety in ERCP. This review aims at delineating current preventive strategies and highlighting novel perspectives for a safer ERCP focusing on the prevention of PEP.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

ercp后胰腺炎的预防:当前策略和新观点。
内窥镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)是一种先进的内窥镜手术,可能导致严重的不良事件。ercp后胰腺炎(PEP)是最常见的手术后并发症,它与显著的死亡率和增加的医疗费用有关。到目前为止,预防PEP的流行方法包括采用药理学和技术手段,这些手段已被证明可以改善ercp后的预后,如直肠非甾体抗炎药的使用,积极的静脉水合作用,以及放置胰腺支架。然而,据报道,PEP起源于程序和患者相关因素的更复杂的相互作用。适当的ERCP培训在预防PEP策略中起着关键作用,而低PEP率被普遍认为是ERCP熟练程度的最相关指标之一,这是不可能的。尽管最近已经做出了一些努力,通过基于模拟的培训缩短学习曲线,并通过满足技术要求和采用技能评估量表来展示能力,但目前关于在ERCP培训期间获得技能的数据很少。此外,无论内窥镜医师的技术能力如何,确定ERCP的适当适应症和准确的术前风险分层可能有助于减少PEP的发生,并总体上保持ERCP的安全性。这篇综述的目的是描述当前的预防策略,并强调新的观点,更安全的ERCP侧重于预防PEP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信