William Borucki , Susan E. Thompson , Eric Agol , Christina Hedges
{"title":"Kepler-62f: Kepler's first small planet in the habitable zone, but is it real?","authors":"William Borucki , Susan E. Thompson , Eric Agol , Christina Hedges","doi":"10.1016/j.newar.2019.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Kepler-62f is the first exoplanet<span> small enough to plausibly have a rocky composition orbiting within the habitable zone (HZ) discovered by the </span></span><span><em>Kepler Mission</em></span>. The planet is 1.4 times the size of the Earth and has an orbital period of 267 days. At the time of its discovery, it had the longest period of any small planet in the habitable zone of a multi-planet system. Because of its long period, only four transits were observed during <em>Kepler's</em> interval of observations. It was initially missed by the <em>Kepler</em> pipeline, but the first three transits were identified by an independent search by Eric Agol, and it was identified as a planet candidate in subsequent <em>Kepler</em> catalogs. However in the latest catalog of exoplanets (Thompson et al., 2018), it is labeled as a false positive. Recent exoplanet catalogues have evolved from subjective classification to automatic classifications of planet candidates by algorithms (such as ‘Robovetter’). While exceptionally useful for producing a uniform catalogue, these algorithms sometimes misclassify planet candidates as a false positive, as is the case of Kepler-62f. In particularly valuable cases, i.e., when a small planet has been found orbiting in the habitable zone (HZ), it is important to conduct comprehensive analyses of the data and classification protocols to provide the best estimate of the true status of the detection. In this paper we conduct such analyses and show that Kepler-62f is a true planet and not a false positive. The table of stellar and planet properties has been updated based on GAIA results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19718,"journal":{"name":"New Astronomy Reviews","volume":"83 ","pages":"Pages 28-36"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.newar.2019.03.002","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Astronomy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1387647318300162","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Kepler-62f is the first exoplanet small enough to plausibly have a rocky composition orbiting within the habitable zone (HZ) discovered by the Kepler Mission. The planet is 1.4 times the size of the Earth and has an orbital period of 267 days. At the time of its discovery, it had the longest period of any small planet in the habitable zone of a multi-planet system. Because of its long period, only four transits were observed during Kepler's interval of observations. It was initially missed by the Kepler pipeline, but the first three transits were identified by an independent search by Eric Agol, and it was identified as a planet candidate in subsequent Kepler catalogs. However in the latest catalog of exoplanets (Thompson et al., 2018), it is labeled as a false positive. Recent exoplanet catalogues have evolved from subjective classification to automatic classifications of planet candidates by algorithms (such as ‘Robovetter’). While exceptionally useful for producing a uniform catalogue, these algorithms sometimes misclassify planet candidates as a false positive, as is the case of Kepler-62f. In particularly valuable cases, i.e., when a small planet has been found orbiting in the habitable zone (HZ), it is important to conduct comprehensive analyses of the data and classification protocols to provide the best estimate of the true status of the detection. In this paper we conduct such analyses and show that Kepler-62f is a true planet and not a false positive. The table of stellar and planet properties has been updated based on GAIA results.
开普勒-62f是第一颗足够小的系外行星,可能在开普勒任务发现的宜居带(HZ)内有岩石组成的轨道。这颗行星的大小是地球的1.4倍,公转周期为267天。在它被发现的时候,它在多行星系统的宜居带中存在的时间是最长的。由于它的周期很长,在开普勒的观测间隔中只观测到四次凌日。它最初没有被开普勒管道发现,但前三次凌日被埃里克·阿戈尔(Eric Agol)的独立搜索发现,并在随后的开普勒星表中被确定为候选行星。然而,在最新的系外行星目录中(Thompson et al., 2018),它被标记为假阳性。最近的系外行星目录已经从主观分类发展到通过算法(如“Robovetter”)对候选行星进行自动分类。虽然这些算法在生成统一的目录方面非常有用,但有时会将候选行星错误地分类为假阳性,就像开普勒-62f的情况一样。在特别有价值的情况下,例如,当发现一颗小行星在宜居带(HZ)轨道上运行时,重要的是对数据和分类方案进行全面分析,以提供对探测真实状况的最佳估计。在本文中,我们进行了这样的分析,并表明开普勒-62f是一颗真正的行星,而不是假阳性。恒星和行星的属性表已经根据GAIA的结果进行了更新。
期刊介绍:
New Astronomy Reviews publishes review articles in all fields of astronomy and astrophysics: theoretical, observational and instrumental. This international review journal is written for a broad audience of professional astronomers and astrophysicists.
The journal covers solar physics, planetary systems, stellar, galactic and extra-galactic astronomy and astrophysics, as well as cosmology. New Astronomy Reviews is also open for proposals covering interdisciplinary and emerging topics such as astrobiology, astroparticle physics, and astrochemistry.