Archival Harm Reduction

Q3 Social Sciences
Archivaria Pub Date : 2022-12-14 DOI:10.7202/1094879ar
Krystal Payne
{"title":"Archival Harm Reduction","authors":"Krystal Payne","doi":"10.7202/1094879ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Canadian archives arose from and help maintain white supremacist and settler-colonial frameworks. The inequitable power relations that exist in archives and archival practices contribute to the harms done to Indigenous people and communities;1 they do so through the ongoing entrenchment of settler colonialism and the participation in extractive colonialism that occur within the processes of archiving and through the systemic racism that comes along with these processes. This article lays out the beginnings of a theoretical framework for an archival harm-reduction approach for managing records by, about, and for Indigenous people and communities that are held in settler archival institutions and managed by settler archivists. Built upon an explicit acknowledgement of the harm that can occur within archives and through archival practices, and connecting public health harm-reduction concepts with Indigenous scholars’ ideas around relationality and power, this framework conceptualizes a process for shifting archival power by building relationships to ensure that the people and communities that records are about or from whom records originate are meaningfully involved in the stewardship of such records. The core harmreduction concept of involving people and communities as the experts in their own lives (and records) is extended to archival practice – touching on topics such as consent, agency, autonomy, and social justice as well as on practices that are community-based, participatory, and reparative – helping to further articulate a person-centred archival theory and practice and illuminating the fact that settler archives cannot simply redescribe their way out of white supremacy.","PeriodicalId":35881,"journal":{"name":"Archivaria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1094879ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Canadian archives arose from and help maintain white supremacist and settler-colonial frameworks. The inequitable power relations that exist in archives and archival practices contribute to the harms done to Indigenous people and communities;1 they do so through the ongoing entrenchment of settler colonialism and the participation in extractive colonialism that occur within the processes of archiving and through the systemic racism that comes along with these processes. This article lays out the beginnings of a theoretical framework for an archival harm-reduction approach for managing records by, about, and for Indigenous people and communities that are held in settler archival institutions and managed by settler archivists. Built upon an explicit acknowledgement of the harm that can occur within archives and through archival practices, and connecting public health harm-reduction concepts with Indigenous scholars’ ideas around relationality and power, this framework conceptualizes a process for shifting archival power by building relationships to ensure that the people and communities that records are about or from whom records originate are meaningfully involved in the stewardship of such records. The core harmreduction concept of involving people and communities as the experts in their own lives (and records) is extended to archival practice – touching on topics such as consent, agency, autonomy, and social justice as well as on practices that are community-based, participatory, and reparative – helping to further articulate a person-centred archival theory and practice and illuminating the fact that settler archives cannot simply redescribe their way out of white supremacy.
减少档案危害
加拿大的档案产生于白人至上主义和移民-殖民主义框架,并有助于维护这些框架。档案和档案实践中存在的不公平的权力关系助长了对土著人民和社区的伤害;1它们是通过不断巩固定居者殖民主义和参与在档案过程中发生的掠夺性殖民主义,以及通过与这些过程一起出现的系统性种族主义来实现的。这篇文章列出了一个理论框架的开端,该框架用于管理在定居者档案机构中保存并由定居者档案保管员管理的土著居民和社区的记录,以及关于土著居民和社区的记录,以减少档案伤害。建立在明确承认档案内部和档案实践中可能发生的危害的基础上,并将减少公共卫生危害的概念与土著学者关于关系和权力的想法联系起来,该框架概念化了通过建立关系来转移档案权力的过程,以确保记录所涉及的人和社区或记录的来源有意义地参与这些记录的管理。将人们和社区作为他们自己生活(和记录)的专家参与其中的核心危害概念扩展到档案实践中-涉及诸如同意,代理,自治和社会正义等主题,以及基于社区,参与性和修复性的实践-有助于进一步阐明以人为本的档案理论和实践,并阐明定居者档案不能简单地重新描述他们摆脱白人至上主义的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archivaria
Archivaria Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信