Brain metastases and immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Istanbul Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1007/s00262-022-03224-2
Haizhu Chen, Yu Feng, Yu Zhou, Yunxia Tao, Le Tang, Yuankai Shi
{"title":"Brain metastases and immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Haizhu Chen, Yu Feng, Yu Zhou, Yunxia Tao, Le Tang, Yuankai Shi","doi":"10.1007/s00262-022-03224-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for brain metastases (BMs) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains debatable. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of ICIs for NSCLC with BMs. We also evaluated the effect of BMs on outcomes of ICIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was conducted to identify studies where the efficacy of ICIs against BMs from NSCLC, or the association between BMs and outcomes of ICIs were evaluated. Outcomes included intracranial objective response rate (icORR), intracranial disease control rate (icDCR), systemic ORR and DCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 33 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled icORR was 13% (95%CI 6-23%) and icDCR was 50% (95%CI 40-63%) for programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) unselected patients with any BMs. For active BMs, pooled icORR was 15% (95%CI 6-28%) and icDCR was 47% (95% CI 36-57%). For PD-L1 ≥ 50% patients with any BMs, pooled icORR and icDCR were 68% (95%CI 57-80%) and 82% (95%CI 73-92%), respectively. Additionally, pooled systemic ORR and DCR for any BMs were 22% (95%CI 15-30%) and 41% (95%CI 18-67%), respectively. Patients with BMs had inferior progression-free survival (HR 1.19, 95%CI 1.07-1.33, P = 0.0016) and overall survival (HR 1.14, 95%CI 1.03-1.25, P = 0.011) when applying ICIs compared to those without BMs. However, no significant difference in systemic ORR between patients with and without BMs was observed (OR 0.94, 95%CI 0.72-1.20, P = 0.629).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ICIs may be clinically active in NSCLC patients with BMs. More effective treatments for BMs from NSCLC are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":42584,"journal":{"name":"Istanbul Medical Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"3071-3085"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10992555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Istanbul Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-022-03224-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for brain metastases (BMs) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains debatable. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of ICIs for NSCLC with BMs. We also evaluated the effect of BMs on outcomes of ICIs.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was conducted to identify studies where the efficacy of ICIs against BMs from NSCLC, or the association between BMs and outcomes of ICIs were evaluated. Outcomes included intracranial objective response rate (icORR), intracranial disease control rate (icDCR), systemic ORR and DCR.

Results: Overall, 33 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled icORR was 13% (95%CI 6-23%) and icDCR was 50% (95%CI 40-63%) for programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) unselected patients with any BMs. For active BMs, pooled icORR was 15% (95%CI 6-28%) and icDCR was 47% (95% CI 36-57%). For PD-L1 ≥ 50% patients with any BMs, pooled icORR and icDCR were 68% (95%CI 57-80%) and 82% (95%CI 73-92%), respectively. Additionally, pooled systemic ORR and DCR for any BMs were 22% (95%CI 15-30%) and 41% (95%CI 18-67%), respectively. Patients with BMs had inferior progression-free survival (HR 1.19, 95%CI 1.07-1.33, P = 0.0016) and overall survival (HR 1.14, 95%CI 1.03-1.25, P = 0.011) when applying ICIs compared to those without BMs. However, no significant difference in systemic ORR between patients with and without BMs was observed (OR 0.94, 95%CI 0.72-1.20, P = 0.629).

Conclusion: ICIs may be clinically active in NSCLC patients with BMs. More effective treatments for BMs from NSCLC are needed.

非小细胞肺癌脑转移与免疫检查点抑制剂:系统综述与荟萃分析。
背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)用于治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)脑转移(BMs)仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨ICIs对NSCLC脑转移瘤的疗效。我们还评估了BMs对ICIs疗效的影响:方法:我们对PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane数据库进行了系统检索,以确定对NSCLC中BMs的ICI疗效或BMs与ICI疗效之间的关联进行评估的研究。结果包括颅内客观反应率(icORR)、颅内疾病控制率(icDCR)、全身ORR和DCR:本次荟萃分析共纳入 33 项研究。对于程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)未入选的任何BMs患者,汇总的icORR为13%(95%CI 6-23%),icDCR为50%(95%CI 40-63%)。对于活跃的骨髓瘤,汇总的 icORR 为 15%(95%CI 6-28%),icDCR 为 47%(95%CI 36-57%)。对于PD-L1≥50%的任何骨髓瘤患者,汇总的icORR和icDCR分别为68%(95%CI 57-80%)和82%(95%CI 73-92%)。此外,任何BMs的集合系统ORR和DCR分别为22%(95%CI 15-30%)和41%(95%CI 18-67%)。与没有BMs的患者相比,有BMs的患者在应用ICIs时无进展生存期(HR 1.19,95%CI 1.07-1.33,P = 0.0016)和总生存期(HR 1.14,95%CI 1.03-1.25,P = 0.011)较差。然而,有BMs和无BMs患者的全身ORR无明显差异(OR 0.94,95%CI 0.72-1.20,P = 0.629):结论:ICIs对有BMs的NSCLC患者可能具有临床活性。结论:ICIs 在患有 BMs 的 NSCLC 患者中可能具有临床活性,需要对 NSCLC BMs 进行更有效的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Istanbul Medical Journal
Istanbul Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信