Reliability interpretation of redundancy on design and seismic behaviour of steel conveyors

IF 0.9 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
L. Haj Najafi, H. Rajabi
{"title":"Reliability interpretation of redundancy on design and seismic behaviour of steel conveyors","authors":"L. Haj Najafi, H. Rajabi","doi":"10.1080/13287982.2023.2176025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study investigates the effect of redundancy incorporation as static indeterminacy and possibility to utilise alternative load paths in design and seismic behaviour of steel truss bridge conveyors by conducting complementary reliability assessments. The results could be supportive in adjusting the degree of indeterminacy, especially for long structures, to convince the design goals. It is conceived that the design approach with lower indeterminacy donates to less structural weight in addition to a bit more fundamental period contributing to less earthquake-induced demands and easily controllable lateral drifts in the end reference points which are very crucial in view of connecting to the adjacent structures. On the other hand, providing more indeterminacy in conveyor design could bring about more ductility, nonlinear displacement and earthquake energy dissipation as well as closer nonlinear behavioural parameters to the amounts recommended by the design code. In reliability assessments by increasing the degree of indeterminacy, the failure probability is reduced which contributes to the design with higher reliability indexes and higher collapse safety margin and it is expected that the incorporation of redundancy effects would be more perceivable by providing models with more redundancy discrepancy.","PeriodicalId":45617,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2023.2176025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates the effect of redundancy incorporation as static indeterminacy and possibility to utilise alternative load paths in design and seismic behaviour of steel truss bridge conveyors by conducting complementary reliability assessments. The results could be supportive in adjusting the degree of indeterminacy, especially for long structures, to convince the design goals. It is conceived that the design approach with lower indeterminacy donates to less structural weight in addition to a bit more fundamental period contributing to less earthquake-induced demands and easily controllable lateral drifts in the end reference points which are very crucial in view of connecting to the adjacent structures. On the other hand, providing more indeterminacy in conveyor design could bring about more ductility, nonlinear displacement and earthquake energy dissipation as well as closer nonlinear behavioural parameters to the amounts recommended by the design code. In reliability assessments by increasing the degree of indeterminacy, the failure probability is reduced which contributes to the design with higher reliability indexes and higher collapse safety margin and it is expected that the incorporation of redundancy effects would be more perceivable by providing models with more redundancy discrepancy.
钢输送机设计和抗震性能冗余的可靠性解释
本研究通过进行互补可靠性评估,研究了冗余合并作为静态不确定性的影响,以及在钢桁架桥梁输送机的设计和地震行为中利用替代荷载路径的可能性。研究结果可以为调整不确定性程度提供支持,特别是对于长结构,以说服设计目标。根据设想,具有较低不确定性的设计方法除了有助于减少地震引起的需求和易于控制的末端参考点的横向漂移之外,还可以减少结构重量,这对于连接相邻结构至关重要。另一方面,在输送机设计中提供更多的不确定性可以带来更多的延性,非线性位移和地震耗能,以及更接近设计规范推荐量的非线性性能参数。在可靠性评估中,通过增加不确定性的程度,降低了失效概率,使设计具有更高的可靠性指标和更高的倒塌安全裕度,并期望通过提供更多冗余差异的模型,使冗余效应的纳入更加明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Structural Engineering (AJSE) is published under the auspices of the Structural College Board of Engineers Australia. It fulfils part of the Board''s mission for Continuing Professional Development. The journal also offers a means for exchange and interaction of scientific and professional issues and technical developments. The journal is open to members and non-members of Engineers Australia. Original papers on research and development (Technical Papers) and professional matters and achievements (Professional Papers) in all areas relevant to the science, art and practice of structural engineering are considered for possible publication. All papers and technical notes are peer-reviewed. The fundamental criterion for acceptance for publication is the intellectual and professional value of the contribution. Occasionally, papers previously published in essentially the same form elsewhere may be considered for publication. In this case acknowledgement to prior publication must be included in a footnote on page one of the manuscript. These papers are peer-reviewed as new submissions. The length of acceptable contributions typically should not exceed 4,000 to 5,000 word equivalents. Longer manuscripts may be considered at the discretion of the Editor. Technical Notes typically should not exceed about 1,000 word equivalents. Discussions on a Paper or Note published in the AJSE are welcomed. Discussions must address significant matters related to the content of a Paper or Technical Note and may include supplementary and critical comments and questions regarding content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信