Improvement the Performance of the Center Pivot Irrigation System under Limited Water Supply to Irrigate Sugar Beet Crop in West West Mania, Egypt.

S. Eid, Amal Abo El-Magd, K. Shalaby, M. Zayed
{"title":"Improvement the Performance of the Center Pivot Irrigation System under Limited Water Supply to Irrigate Sugar Beet Crop in West West Mania, Egypt.","authors":"S. Eid, Amal Abo El-Magd, K. Shalaby, M. Zayed","doi":"10.21608/jssae.2023.193401.1147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to explore different strategies to operate the systems of center pivot when facing the problem of limited water supply or not receiving enough water to operate as designed to irrigate the total area. Four different scenarios were evaluated: Irrigated full circle (CP1) control, irrigated three-quarter circle (CP2), irrigated half circle (CP3), and irrigated full circle with removing one span (CP4). The results showed that the distribution uniformity (DU) was excellent for all scenarios, with values of 92.7, 92.8, 93, and 94 for CP1, CP2, CP3, and CP4 respectively. Also, the coefficients of uniformity (CU) values were 94.5, 93.8, 95.2, and 97.9 for CP1, CP2, CP3, and CP4 respectively. The irrigation water productivity was the highest in the CP4 treatment, which was 9.17 kg/m but the lowest value in CP1, which was 6.56 kg/m, which was higher by 39.8% compared to CP1 treatments. The highest yield was obtained for CP4 treatment, which was 28 tons/fed, which was higher by 16.7% compared to CP1 treatments. The irrigation water applied was the highest in the CP1 treatment; it was 3660.5 m/fed but the lowest values in CP4, was: 3053.6 m/fed, the results indicate that the CP4 treatment utilized less water compared to the CP1 treatment, saving water by 16.6%. In conclusion, when of limited irrigation water, the best solution is to remove one of the axis towers from the center pivot which results in the highest yield and irrigation water productivity.","PeriodicalId":17094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/jssae.2023.193401.1147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to explore different strategies to operate the systems of center pivot when facing the problem of limited water supply or not receiving enough water to operate as designed to irrigate the total area. Four different scenarios were evaluated: Irrigated full circle (CP1) control, irrigated three-quarter circle (CP2), irrigated half circle (CP3), and irrigated full circle with removing one span (CP4). The results showed that the distribution uniformity (DU) was excellent for all scenarios, with values of 92.7, 92.8, 93, and 94 for CP1, CP2, CP3, and CP4 respectively. Also, the coefficients of uniformity (CU) values were 94.5, 93.8, 95.2, and 97.9 for CP1, CP2, CP3, and CP4 respectively. The irrigation water productivity was the highest in the CP4 treatment, which was 9.17 kg/m but the lowest value in CP1, which was 6.56 kg/m, which was higher by 39.8% compared to CP1 treatments. The highest yield was obtained for CP4 treatment, which was 28 tons/fed, which was higher by 16.7% compared to CP1 treatments. The irrigation water applied was the highest in the CP1 treatment; it was 3660.5 m/fed but the lowest values in CP4, was: 3053.6 m/fed, the results indicate that the CP4 treatment utilized less water compared to the CP1 treatment, saving water by 16.6%. In conclusion, when of limited irrigation water, the best solution is to remove one of the axis towers from the center pivot which results in the highest yield and irrigation water productivity.
埃及West West Mania有限供水条件下提高中心枢纽灌溉系统灌溉甜菜作物的性能。
本研究旨在探讨在水资源供应有限或无法按设计水量运行以灌溉总面积的情况下,中心枢纽系统的不同运行策略。评估了四种不同的情况:全圆灌溉(CP1)控制、四分之三圆灌溉(CP2)、半圆灌溉(CP3)和全圆灌溉去除一个跨度(CP4)。结果表明,CP1、CP2、CP3和CP4的分布均匀度(DU)分别为92.7、92.8、93和94。CP1、CP2、CP3和CP4的均匀性系数(CU)分别为94.5、93.8、95.2和97.9。灌溉水生产力以CP4处理最高,为9.17 kg/m, CP1处理最低,为6.56 kg/m,比CP1处理高39.8%。CP4处理产量最高,为28吨/只,比CP1处理提高16.7%。CP1处理灌水量最大;CP4的最小值为:3053.6 m/fed。结果表明,与CP1处理相比,CP4处理的水分利用率更低,节水16.6%。综上所述,在灌溉水有限的情况下,最佳的解决方案是从中心支点上移除一个轴塔,从而获得最高的产量和灌溉水生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信