Accuracy of Flash Glucose Monitoring in Hemodialysis Patients With and Without Diabetes Mellitus.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Michèle Weber, Matthias Hannes Diebold, Peter Wiesli, Andreas David Kistler
{"title":"Accuracy of Flash Glucose Monitoring in Hemodialysis Patients With and Without Diabetes Mellitus.","authors":"Michèle Weber,&nbsp;Matthias Hannes Diebold,&nbsp;Peter Wiesli,&nbsp;Andreas David Kistler","doi":"10.1055/a-1978-0226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Glucose and insulin metabolism are altered in hemodialysis patients, and diabetes management is difficult in these patients. We aimed to validate flash glucose monitoring (FGM) in hemodialysis patients with and without diabetes mellitus as an attractive option for glucose monitoring not requiring regular self-punctures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We measured interstitial glucose using a FreeStyle Libre device in eight hemodialysis patients with and seven without diabetes mellitus over 14 days and compared the results to simultaneously performed self-monitoring of capillary blood glucose (SMBG).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 720 paired measurements, mean flash glucose values were significantly lower than self-measured capillary values (6.17±2.52 vs. 7.15±2.41 mmol/L, p=1.3 E-86). Overall, the mean absolute relative difference was 17.4%, and the mean absolute difference was 1.20 mmol/L. The systematic error was significantly larger in patients without vs. with diabetes (- 1.17 vs. - 0.82 mmol/L) and on dialysis vs. interdialytic days (-1.09 vs. -0.90 mmol/L). Compared to venous blood glucose (72 paired measurements), the systematic error of FGM was even larger (5.89±2.44 mmol/L vs. 7.78±7.25 mmol/L, p=3.74E-22). Several strategies to reduce the systematic error were evaluated, including the addition of +1.0 mmol/L as a correction term to all FGM values, which significantly improved accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FGM systematically underestimates blood glucose in hemodialysis patients but, taking this systematic error into account, the system may be useful for glucose monitoring in hemodialysis patients with or without diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12241,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f9/d2/10-1055-a-1978-0226.PMC9998185.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1978-0226","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Glucose and insulin metabolism are altered in hemodialysis patients, and diabetes management is difficult in these patients. We aimed to validate flash glucose monitoring (FGM) in hemodialysis patients with and without diabetes mellitus as an attractive option for glucose monitoring not requiring regular self-punctures.

Methods: We measured interstitial glucose using a FreeStyle Libre device in eight hemodialysis patients with and seven without diabetes mellitus over 14 days and compared the results to simultaneously performed self-monitoring of capillary blood glucose (SMBG).

Results: In 720 paired measurements, mean flash glucose values were significantly lower than self-measured capillary values (6.17±2.52 vs. 7.15±2.41 mmol/L, p=1.3 E-86). Overall, the mean absolute relative difference was 17.4%, and the mean absolute difference was 1.20 mmol/L. The systematic error was significantly larger in patients without vs. with diabetes (- 1.17 vs. - 0.82 mmol/L) and on dialysis vs. interdialytic days (-1.09 vs. -0.90 mmol/L). Compared to venous blood glucose (72 paired measurements), the systematic error of FGM was even larger (5.89±2.44 mmol/L vs. 7.78±7.25 mmol/L, p=3.74E-22). Several strategies to reduce the systematic error were evaluated, including the addition of +1.0 mmol/L as a correction term to all FGM values, which significantly improved accuracy.

Conclusions: FGM systematically underestimates blood glucose in hemodialysis patients but, taking this systematic error into account, the system may be useful for glucose monitoring in hemodialysis patients with or without diabetes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

伴有和不伴有糖尿病的血液透析患者血糖监测的准确性。
目的:血液透析患者的葡萄糖和胰岛素代谢发生改变,这些患者的糖尿病管理困难。我们的目的是验证在有或没有糖尿病的血液透析患者中,快速血糖监测(FGM)是一种有吸引力的血糖监测选择,不需要定期自我穿刺。方法:我们使用FreeStyle Libre装置测量了8例合并糖尿病和7例非糖尿病血液透析患者14天间质血糖,并将结果与同时进行的毛细血管血糖(SMBG)自我监测进行比较。结果:在720组配对测量中,平均瞬时血糖值显著低于自测毛细血管值(6.17±2.52 vs. 7.15±2.41 mmol/L, p=1.3 E-86)。总体而言,平均绝对相对差为17.4%,平均绝对差为1.20 mmol/L。无糖尿病患者的系统误差明显大于糖尿病患者(- 1.17 vs - 0.82 mmol/L),透析患者的系统误差明显大于透析期间的系统误差(-1.09 vs -0.90 mmol/L)。与静脉血血糖(72对测量)相比,FGM的系统误差更大(5.89±2.44 mmol/L vs. 7.78±7.25 mmol/L, p=3.74E-22)。评估了几种减少系统误差的策略,包括在所有女性生殖器切割值中添加+1.0 mmol/L作为校正项,这显着提高了准确性。结论:女性生殖器切割系统地低估了血液透析患者的血糖,但考虑到这一系统误差,该系统可能对伴有或不伴有糖尿病的血液透析患者的血糖监测有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
72
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Publishing outstanding articles from all fields of endocrinology and diabetology, from molecular biology to clinical research, this journal is a brilliant resource. Since being published in English in 1983, the popularity of this journal has grown steadily, reflecting the importance of this publication within its field. Original contributions and short communications appear in each issue along with reviews addressing current topics. In addition, supplementary issues are published each year presenting abstracts or proceedings of national and international scientific meetings. The journal was initially published in German and is still the oldest endocrinological periodical in the German-language market!
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信