The Making and Breaking of a Popular Front: The Case of the National Negro Congress

IF 0.3 Q4 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
E. Arnesen
{"title":"The Making and Breaking of a Popular Front: The Case of the National Negro Congress","authors":"E. Arnesen","doi":"10.1215/15476715-10237864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Drawing together members of the American Communist Party and a variety of non-Communist progressives in the common cause of racial equality, labor rights, and antifascism, the National Negro Congress represented a visible example of the Popular Front (1935/1936–39) in action. This article explores how a Popular Front alliance came into being by tracing the events of 1935 that led Communists to eschew their prior sectarianism and non-Communists to recognize the value of collaboration with their now-former rivals. It also contends that contrary to what some recent scholarship argues, from the outset the Communist influence on the NNC’s formation and operation was considerable—even decisive—and that after the signing of the 1939 Hitler-Stalin Pact, the party’s new antiwar stance and its numerical dominance at the NNC’s third conference in 1940 led to the collapse of the Popular Front alliance. Understanding the rise and fall of the NNC as a progressive coalition requires a critical evaluation of the role of the Communist Party in the NNC’s accomplishments and failures.","PeriodicalId":43329,"journal":{"name":"Labor-Studies in Working-Class History of the Americas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor-Studies in Working-Class History of the Americas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/15476715-10237864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Drawing together members of the American Communist Party and a variety of non-Communist progressives in the common cause of racial equality, labor rights, and antifascism, the National Negro Congress represented a visible example of the Popular Front (1935/1936–39) in action. This article explores how a Popular Front alliance came into being by tracing the events of 1935 that led Communists to eschew their prior sectarianism and non-Communists to recognize the value of collaboration with their now-former rivals. It also contends that contrary to what some recent scholarship argues, from the outset the Communist influence on the NNC’s formation and operation was considerable—even decisive—and that after the signing of the 1939 Hitler-Stalin Pact, the party’s new antiwar stance and its numerical dominance at the NNC’s third conference in 1940 led to the collapse of the Popular Front alliance. Understanding the rise and fall of the NNC as a progressive coalition requires a critical evaluation of the role of the Communist Party in the NNC’s accomplishments and failures.
一个人民阵线的形成与破裂:以全国黑人代表大会为例
摘要:全国黑人大会(National Negro Congress)将美国共产党成员与各种非共产主义进步人士聚集在一起,共同致力于种族平等、劳工权利和反法西斯主义等共同事业,是人民阵线(1935/1936-39)在行动中的一个明显例子。这篇文章通过追溯1935年的事件,探讨了人民阵线联盟是如何形成的,这些事件导致共产党人避开了他们之前的宗派主义,非共产党人认识到与他们现在的前对手合作的价值。它还认为,与最近一些学者的观点相反,共产党从一开始就对全国代表大会的形成和运作产生了相当大的影响——甚至是决定性的影响——并且在1939年《希特勒-斯大林条约》签署后,该党新的反战立场及其在1940年全国代表大会第三次会议上的数量优势导致了人民阵线联盟的瓦解。要理解NNC作为一个进步联盟的兴衰,就需要对共产党在NNC的成就和失败中所扮演的角色进行批判性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信