Molecular detection of E. faecalis in oral samples of a population associated with secondary endodontic infection

IF 0.2 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
B. Kesim, Seda Tezcan Ülger, Hamza Cudal, G. Aslan, Leyla Ersoy, T. Aslan, M. Küçük
{"title":"Molecular detection of E. faecalis in oral samples of a population associated with secondary endodontic infection","authors":"B. Kesim, Seda Tezcan Ülger, Hamza Cudal, G. Aslan, Leyla Ersoy, T. Aslan, M. Küçük","doi":"10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.no3.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of Enterococcus faecalis in samples of oral rinse and tongue dorsum of endodontic patients with secondary/persistent infections (EPSI) using the PCR method. \nMethodology: Oral rinse samples (ORS) and tongue swab samples (TSS) of 22 patients (EPSI group) and 32 healthy individuals (control group) were collected. DNA isolation from the TSS and ORS samples was performed using the modified classical phenol-chloroform and chloroform method. To detect E. faecalis strains directly from the TSS and ORS samples, the 310 base pair (bp) segment of the 16S rDNA of the E. faecalis genome was amplified by PCR using specific primers. The prevalence of E. faecalis was compared between healthy and sick individuals using the Chi-square test, significance was set at p<0.05. \nResults: In the ORS samples, there was a significant difference between the healthy individuals (n = 11, 34%) and the EPSI group (n = 15, 68%) in terms of the presence of E. faecalis (p = 0.026). In the TSS, the presence of E. faecalis was also investigated, and a significant difference was found between healthy individuals (n = 3, 9%) and the EPSI group (n = 11, 50%) (p = 0.001). In the EPSI group, no statistically significant difference was present in the prevalence rate of E. faecalis between the samples of ORS (68%) and TSS (50%) (p = 0.358). \nConclusion: The prevalence of E. faecalis was found to be statistically significantly higher in multi-site oral samples of a population with secondary endodontic infection than healthy individuals. \n  \nHow to cite this article: Kesim B, Tezcan Ülger S, Cudal H, Aslan G, Ersoy L, Aslan T, Küçük MÖ. Molecular detection of E. faecalis in oral samples of a population associated with secondary endodontic infection. Int Dent Res 2021;11(3):180-4. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.no3.7 \n  \nLinguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.","PeriodicalId":31322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.no3.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of Enterococcus faecalis in samples of oral rinse and tongue dorsum of endodontic patients with secondary/persistent infections (EPSI) using the PCR method. Methodology: Oral rinse samples (ORS) and tongue swab samples (TSS) of 22 patients (EPSI group) and 32 healthy individuals (control group) were collected. DNA isolation from the TSS and ORS samples was performed using the modified classical phenol-chloroform and chloroform method. To detect E. faecalis strains directly from the TSS and ORS samples, the 310 base pair (bp) segment of the 16S rDNA of the E. faecalis genome was amplified by PCR using specific primers. The prevalence of E. faecalis was compared between healthy and sick individuals using the Chi-square test, significance was set at p<0.05. Results: In the ORS samples, there was a significant difference between the healthy individuals (n = 11, 34%) and the EPSI group (n = 15, 68%) in terms of the presence of E. faecalis (p = 0.026). In the TSS, the presence of E. faecalis was also investigated, and a significant difference was found between healthy individuals (n = 3, 9%) and the EPSI group (n = 11, 50%) (p = 0.001). In the EPSI group, no statistically significant difference was present in the prevalence rate of E. faecalis between the samples of ORS (68%) and TSS (50%) (p = 0.358). Conclusion: The prevalence of E. faecalis was found to be statistically significantly higher in multi-site oral samples of a population with secondary endodontic infection than healthy individuals.   How to cite this article: Kesim B, Tezcan Ülger S, Cudal H, Aslan G, Ersoy L, Aslan T, Küçük MÖ. Molecular detection of E. faecalis in oral samples of a population associated with secondary endodontic infection. Int Dent Res 2021;11(3):180-4. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.no3.7   Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.
与继发性牙髓感染相关人群口腔样本中粪肠杆菌的分子检测
目的:采用PCR方法对继发性/持续性感染(EPSI)的根管患者口腔冲洗液和舌背样本中粪肠球菌的感染率进行评价。方法:收集22例EPSI患者(组)和32例健康者(对照组)的口腔冲洗液(ORS)和舌拭子(TSS)样本。采用改良的经典苯酚-氯仿法和氯仿法对TSS和ORS样品进行DNA分离。为了直接从TSS和ORS样品中检测粪肠球菌菌株,采用特异性引物PCR扩增粪肠球菌基因组16S rDNA 310碱基对(bp)片段。健康人群与患病人群粪肠球菌患病率比较采用卡方检验,p<0.05为显著性。结果:在ORS样本中,健康组(n = 11,34%)与EPSI组(n = 15,68%)的粪肠球菌存在率差异有统计学意义(p = 0.026)。在TSS中,也调查了粪肠球菌的存在,发现健康个体(n = 3,9%)与EPSI组(n = 11,50%)之间存在显著差异(p = 0.001)。在EPSI组中,ORS组(68%)和TSS组(50%)的粪肠球菌患病率差异无统计学意义(p = 0.358)。结论:继发性牙髓感染人群多部位口腔标本中粪肠球菌的患病率明显高于健康人群。本文引自:Kesim B, Tezcan Ülger S, Cudal H, Aslan G, Ersoy L, Aslan T, k k MÖ。与继发性牙髓感染相关人群口腔样本中粪肠杆菌的分子检测。国际医学杂志,2021;11(3):180-4。https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.no3.7语言修改:本手稿中的英语已由至少两名专业编辑检查,他们都是英语母语者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信