Organic farming enhances soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics in oil palm crops from Southeast Amazon

IF 1.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
S. Mardegan, A. D. de Castro, S. S. F. Chaves, Richardson Sandro dos Santos Freitas, Manoela Sena Avelar, F. S. O. Filho
{"title":"Organic farming enhances soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics in oil palm crops from Southeast Amazon","authors":"S. Mardegan, A. D. de Castro, S. S. F. Chaves, Richardson Sandro dos Santos Freitas, Manoela Sena Avelar, F. S. O. Filho","doi":"10.1080/00380768.2022.2031285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The expansion of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq, Arecaceae) crops threatens tropical rainforests. It negatively impacts a series of ecosystem services and functions, including carbon (C) sequestration and dynamics, as well as nutrient cycling. Such negative impacts have pressured companies to adopt conservationist practices in palm oil production. And yet the conversion from conventional to organic farming has gained space in the last decade, studies assessing the effects of organic oil palm crops on ecosystem functioning are still scarce. Here, we assessed how alternative farming practices affect organic matter dynamics in oil palm crops. We compared oil palm crops under conventional (CP) and organic (OP) farming in Southeast Amazon. We also sampled lowland dense ombrophilous forest (floresta densa de terra firme, FT) as reference. Soils were sampled at 0–10, 10–20, and 20–30 cm depth intervals to determine soil physical–chemical properties and C and nitrogen (N) concentrations and stocks. The highest soil C and N concentrations were found at 0–10 cm interval in CP and OP. We detected no variation in soil C and N stocks within depth intervals in FT and CP, while OP had higher soil C and N stocks at the 0–10 cm interval. When comparing OP and CP crops, soil C concentrations and stocks did not vary within zones or depth intervals. All OP zones had higher soil N concentrations and stocks than their conventional counterparts, and we found a variation within depth intervals. Our results show that organic farming has positively influenced organic matter dynamics. Organic oil palm crops preserved and even increased C and N sequestration.","PeriodicalId":21852,"journal":{"name":"Soil Science and Plant Nutrition","volume":"7 1","pages":"104 - 113"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Science and Plant Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2022.2031285","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT The expansion of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq, Arecaceae) crops threatens tropical rainforests. It negatively impacts a series of ecosystem services and functions, including carbon (C) sequestration and dynamics, as well as nutrient cycling. Such negative impacts have pressured companies to adopt conservationist practices in palm oil production. And yet the conversion from conventional to organic farming has gained space in the last decade, studies assessing the effects of organic oil palm crops on ecosystem functioning are still scarce. Here, we assessed how alternative farming practices affect organic matter dynamics in oil palm crops. We compared oil palm crops under conventional (CP) and organic (OP) farming in Southeast Amazon. We also sampled lowland dense ombrophilous forest (floresta densa de terra firme, FT) as reference. Soils were sampled at 0–10, 10–20, and 20–30 cm depth intervals to determine soil physical–chemical properties and C and nitrogen (N) concentrations and stocks. The highest soil C and N concentrations were found at 0–10 cm interval in CP and OP. We detected no variation in soil C and N stocks within depth intervals in FT and CP, while OP had higher soil C and N stocks at the 0–10 cm interval. When comparing OP and CP crops, soil C concentrations and stocks did not vary within zones or depth intervals. All OP zones had higher soil N concentrations and stocks than their conventional counterparts, and we found a variation within depth intervals. Our results show that organic farming has positively influenced organic matter dynamics. Organic oil palm crops preserved and even increased C and N sequestration.
有机农业提高了亚马逊东南部油棕作物的土壤碳氮动态
油棕(Elaeis guineensis Jacq,槟榔科)作物的扩张威胁着热带雨林。它对一系列生态系统服务和功能产生负面影响,包括碳(C)固存和动态,以及养分循环。这些负面影响迫使企业在棕榈油生产中采取环保措施。然而,在过去十年中,从传统农业向有机农业的转变已经获得了空间,评估有机油棕作物对生态系统功能影响的研究仍然很少。在这里,我们评估了替代耕作方式如何影响油棕作物的有机质动态。我们比较了亚马逊东南地区常规(CP)和有机(OP)种植方式下的油棕作物。我们还取样了低地茂密的无亲缘林(floresta densa de terra firme, FT)作为参考。在0 ~ 10、10 ~ 20和20 ~ 30 cm深度取样土壤,测定土壤理化性质和碳、氮(N)浓度及储量。土壤C和N含量在0 ~ 10 cm区间最高。土壤C和N储量在深度区间内无变化,而土壤C和N储量在0 ~ 10 cm区间较高。在比较有机磷作物和有机磷作物时,土壤碳浓度和储量在区域或深度间隔内没有变化。所有作业区的土壤氮含量和储量均高于常规作业区,且在深度区间内存在差异。我们的研究结果表明,有机农业对有机质动态有积极的影响。有机油棕作物保存,甚至增加碳氮固存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
15.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Soil Science and Plant Nutrition is the official English journal of the Japanese Society of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition (JSSSPN), and publishes original research and reviews in soil physics, chemistry and mineralogy; soil biology; plant nutrition; soil genesis, classification and survey; soil fertility; fertilizers and soil amendments; environment; socio cultural soil science. The Journal publishes full length papers, short papers, and reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信