Intrauterine Pregnancy Detection and Gestational Age Assessment During Early Pregnancy by a Handheld Point-Of-Care Ultrasound Device Compared to a High-End Ultrasound System. An Accuracy and Reliability Study.

Mariela Skendi, Roxane Liard, Charlotte Besacier, Jean-Michel Correas, Sohela Moussaoui, Julie Chastang, Gladys Ibanez
{"title":"Intrauterine Pregnancy Detection and Gestational Age Assessment During Early Pregnancy by a Handheld Point-Of-Care Ultrasound Device Compared to a High-End Ultrasound System. An Accuracy and Reliability Study.","authors":"Mariela Skendi,&nbsp;Roxane Liard,&nbsp;Charlotte Besacier,&nbsp;Jean-Michel Correas,&nbsp;Sohela Moussaoui,&nbsp;Julie Chastang,&nbsp;Gladys Ibanez","doi":"10.24908/pocus.v7i2.15458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The main objective of this study is the evaluation of the accuracy and reliability of a handheld point of care ultrasound device (POCUS-hd) for intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) detection compared to comprehensive reference transabdominal ultrasound (TU). The secondary objectives were to evaluate POCUS-hd for intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) detection compared to transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound (TUTV), evaluate the inter-device agreement and inter-rater reliability of gestational age during early pregnancy. <b>Methods:</b> It is an observational transverse study with consecutive patient recruitment. Two blinded operators systematically used POCUS-hd and reference transabdominal ultrasound for IUP diagnosis. The accuracy of POCUS-hd for IUP diagnosis was expressed as sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV). The gestational age (GA) was assessed based on the crown-rump length. The reliability and agreement of gestational age evaluation were assessed by Bland-Altman plots, kappa statistic, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). <b>Results:</b> POCUS-hd compared to TU had a sensitivity of 95-100%, a specifcity of 90-100%, PPV of 95-100% and NPV of 90-100%. Inter-rater agreement for IUP detection using POCUS-hd was very good, kappa=1.0; CI95% [0.9-1.0]. The inter-device agreement limits (mean difference ± 2SD) for GA were: -3 to +2.3 days by Operator 1, -3.4 to +3.3 days by Operator 2 for POCUS-hd vs. TU and -3.1 to +2.3 days for POCUS-hd versus TUTV. <b>Conclusion:</b> This handheld POCUS device is an accurate and reliable diagnostic tool that can be used for IUP positive findings and GA assessment during early pregnancy by clinicians in family planning settings or general practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":74470,"journal":{"name":"POCUS journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9983726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POCUS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/pocus.v7i2.15458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The main objective of this study is the evaluation of the accuracy and reliability of a handheld point of care ultrasound device (POCUS-hd) for intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) detection compared to comprehensive reference transabdominal ultrasound (TU). The secondary objectives were to evaluate POCUS-hd for intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) detection compared to transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound (TUTV), evaluate the inter-device agreement and inter-rater reliability of gestational age during early pregnancy. Methods: It is an observational transverse study with consecutive patient recruitment. Two blinded operators systematically used POCUS-hd and reference transabdominal ultrasound for IUP diagnosis. The accuracy of POCUS-hd for IUP diagnosis was expressed as sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV). The gestational age (GA) was assessed based on the crown-rump length. The reliability and agreement of gestational age evaluation were assessed by Bland-Altman plots, kappa statistic, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: POCUS-hd compared to TU had a sensitivity of 95-100%, a specifcity of 90-100%, PPV of 95-100% and NPV of 90-100%. Inter-rater agreement for IUP detection using POCUS-hd was very good, kappa=1.0; CI95% [0.9-1.0]. The inter-device agreement limits (mean difference ± 2SD) for GA were: -3 to +2.3 days by Operator 1, -3.4 to +3.3 days by Operator 2 for POCUS-hd vs. TU and -3.1 to +2.3 days for POCUS-hd versus TUTV. Conclusion: This handheld POCUS device is an accurate and reliable diagnostic tool that can be used for IUP positive findings and GA assessment during early pregnancy by clinicians in family planning settings or general practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

手持式即时超声设备与高端超声系统的宫内妊娠检测与胎龄评估。准确性和可靠性研究。
目的:本研究的主要目的是评估手持式护理点超声装置(POCUS-hd)用于宫内妊娠(IUP)检测的准确性和可靠性,并与综合参考经腹超声(TU)进行比较。次要目的是评估POCUS-hd与经腹和经阴道超声(TUTV)相比用于宫内妊娠(IUP)检测的效果,评估早期妊娠期间不同设备间的一致性和不同设备间胎龄的可靠性。方法:采用连续招募患者的观察性横向研究。两名盲法操作人员系统地使用POCUS-hd和参考经腹超声诊断IUP。POCUS-hd诊断IUP的准确性分别为敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值(NPV)和阳性预测值(PPV)。根据冠臀长评估胎龄(GA)。采用Bland-Altman图、kappa统计量和类内相关系数(ICC)评价胎龄评价的可靠性和一致性。结果:与TU相比,POCUS-hd的敏感性为95 ~ 100%,特异性为90 ~ 100%,PPV为95 ~ 100%,NPV为90 ~ 100%。使用POCUS-hd检测IUP的评分一致性很好,kappa=1.0;CI95%[0.9 - -1.0]。GA的设备间协议限制(平均差±2SD)为:操作员1为-3至+2.3天,操作员2为-3.4至+3.3天,操作员1为-3.1至+2.3天,操作员2为-3.1至+2.3天。结论:该手持式POCUS设备是一种准确可靠的诊断工具,可用于IUP阳性结果和早期妊娠GA评估的临床医生在计划生育设置或一般做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信