Comparative Study on Microbial Communities of Soil, Grape Must and Wine Fermentation of Cabernet Sauvignon Inoculated with three Commercial Yeast of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Rongbin Li, Xuehong Shi, Yaqiong Liu, Haoran Wang, Xiaofa Fu, Huanxiang Wang, Jianlou Mu, Jie Wang
{"title":"Comparative Study on Microbial Communities of Soil, Grape Must and Wine Fermentation of Cabernet Sauvignon Inoculated with three Commercial Yeast of Saccharomyces cerevisiae","authors":"Rongbin Li, Xuehong Shi, Yaqiong Liu, Haoran Wang, Xiaofa Fu, Huanxiang Wang, Jianlou Mu, Jie Wang","doi":"10.3844/ajbbsp.2021.448.464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corresponding Author: Jie Wang College of Food Science and Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, Hebei, 071000, China Email: wangjie@hebau.edu.cn Abstract: This study examined the microbial diversity in soil, grape must and wine fermentation of Cabernet Sauvignon inoculated with three different starters (S01: Xinjiang Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEC01; SCA: Ningxia Saccharomyces cerevisiae CECA; S96: Saccharomyces cerevisiae AWRI 796) using a high-throughput sequencing technique. The results showed that 227 bacterial genera and 20 fungi genera were shared in all samples, consisting of Saccharomyces, Filobasidium, Colletotrichum, Alternaria by Venn diagram analysis. Principle component analysis showed the microbiota structures between S01, SCA and S96 fermentation were similar, the major bacterial genera were Pseudomonas, unclassified_f_Enterobacteriaceae and Lactobacillus, whereas the major fungi genus was Saccharomyces. The biomarkers of bacterial genera in S01, SCA and S96 groups were detected using LEfSe analysis, in which Komagataeibacter, Micromonospora, Streptomyces, Brevibacterium and Agromyces were core microorganisms in the S01 group, SCA fermentation increased the relative abundance of Lactobacillus and Oenococcus, family Ruminococcaceae was dominant in the S96 group. The distinctions in fungi communities between S01, SCA and S96 group were not observed during the fermentation. Understanding of microbial diversity could aid to promote the formation of regional characteristics and the development of high-quality wines through the management of existing microorganisms in future.","PeriodicalId":7412,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3844/ajbbsp.2021.448.464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Corresponding Author: Jie Wang College of Food Science and Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, Hebei, 071000, China Email: wangjie@hebau.edu.cn Abstract: This study examined the microbial diversity in soil, grape must and wine fermentation of Cabernet Sauvignon inoculated with three different starters (S01: Xinjiang Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEC01; SCA: Ningxia Saccharomyces cerevisiae CECA; S96: Saccharomyces cerevisiae AWRI 796) using a high-throughput sequencing technique. The results showed that 227 bacterial genera and 20 fungi genera were shared in all samples, consisting of Saccharomyces, Filobasidium, Colletotrichum, Alternaria by Venn diagram analysis. Principle component analysis showed the microbiota structures between S01, SCA and S96 fermentation were similar, the major bacterial genera were Pseudomonas, unclassified_f_Enterobacteriaceae and Lactobacillus, whereas the major fungi genus was Saccharomyces. The biomarkers of bacterial genera in S01, SCA and S96 groups were detected using LEfSe analysis, in which Komagataeibacter, Micromonospora, Streptomyces, Brevibacterium and Agromyces were core microorganisms in the S01 group, SCA fermentation increased the relative abundance of Lactobacillus and Oenococcus, family Ruminococcaceae was dominant in the S96 group. The distinctions in fungi communities between S01, SCA and S96 group were not observed during the fermentation. Understanding of microbial diversity could aid to promote the formation of regional characteristics and the development of high-quality wines through the management of existing microorganisms in future.
三种酿酒酵母菌接种赤霞珠发酵过程中土壤、葡萄和葡萄酒微生物群落的比较研究
摘要:本试验研究了三种不同发酵剂(S01: Xinjiang Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEC01;SCA:宁夏酿酒酵母CECA;S96: Saccharomyces cerevisiae AWRI 796),采用高通量测序技术。Venn图分析结果表明,所有样品共有227个细菌属和20个真菌属,包括Saccharomyces、Filobasidium、Colletotrichum和Alternaria。主成分分析表明,S01、SCA和S96发酵菌群结构相似,主要细菌属为假单胞菌、未分类肠杆菌科和乳杆菌属,真菌属为Saccharomyces。利用LEfSe分析检测S01、SCA和S96组细菌属生物标志物,其中Komagataeibacter、Micromonospora、Streptomyces、Brevibacterium和Agromyces是S01组的核心微生物,SCA发酵提高了乳酸菌和酒球菌的相对丰度,在S96组以Ruminococcaceae家族占优势。在发酵过程中,S01、SCA和S96组的真菌群落没有明显差异。了解微生物多样性有助于未来通过对现有微生物的管理,促进区域特色的形成和高品质葡萄酒的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology
American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: :: General biochemistry :: Patho-biochemistry :: Evolutionary biotechnology :: Structural biology :: Molecular and cellular biology :: Molecular medicine :: Cancer research :: Virology :: Immunology :: Plant molecular biology and biochemistry :: Experimental methodologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信