Transformation of State functions under the influence of pandemic conditions

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
A. Trutaeva
{"title":"Transformation of State functions under the influence of pandemic conditions","authors":"A. Trutaeva","doi":"10.17223/22253513/46/15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pandemic of the new coronavirus infection, which has been going on in the world for several years, is regarded as a global challenge to the existing structure of public life, the economy, and the state, having had a powerful destructive impact on all spheres of people's lives. Assessing the pandemic as a total threat in the world of work, the International Labour Organization (hereinafter - the ILO) in one of its reports stressed that policy responses should primarily be aimed at solving such tasks as protecting workers, employers, and their family members from the threat posed by a new coronavirus infection, establishing and strengthening protection measures. from it, as well as support for employment and income, stimulating the economy and demand for labor. Among the main state responses in the field of social protection of the ILO are access to medical care, social security in connection with illness (temporary disability benefits), protection from unemployment, social protection of elderly citizens and families with children, the establishment of temporary social benefits for socially vulnerable categories of citizens, benefits in the field of taxes and contributions for social insurance, ensuring the prompt and correct operation of the mechanism for providing social security. In an attempt to counter the multiple and extensive negative effects of the pandemic, today often referred to as a coronacrisis in general, to protect the population from such, States have taken various measures, and often radical ones. The researchers note that the most common areas of work of states around the world have become support for national health systems, support for living conditions and incomes of the population, state lending to business, tax measures for the population and business. It seems that in the conditions of a pandemic, any functions performed by the State ultimately lead to consequences inherent in the social function. And such a transformation of the functions of the state today is more in line with the public demand. Stimulating, supporting or limiting steps that have been taken in various countries of the world in order to counteract the consequences of the pandemic and protect the population and business from such, have received an ambiguous and sometimes contradictory assessment of citizens. It should be noted at the same time that in the current situation, threatening danger even with elementary social interactions, restrictive measures were approved by citizens: the latter were not always against the establishment of a ban on movement, social contacts, etc. The experience of the pandemic has shown that the intervention of public authorities in the spheres of public relations, in which their active participation previously caused contradictions and was limited in order to provide participants with freedom of expression, is now a necessity and is mainly approved by society.: This is characteristic of both the sphere of civil turnover (rental relations, issues of accrual of sanctions for late fulfillment of obligations), and the sphere of labor relations (issues of dismissal of an employee, remuneration). In the field of social security, the existing conditions have provoked a new round of discussion about the availability, guarantee of social security, and mechanisms for exercising the right to it in changing stressful circumstances. The above points to the transformation of the role of the state under the influence of emergency conditions: in such a person expects to meet in the person of the state not an indifferent observer or business partner, but sometimes an assistant and a guarantor of security, including physical. The content of the social function in the conditions under consideration, in addition to the provision of rights, opportunities, benefits, acquires an element of limitation, the establishment of a framework. At the same time, this restriction is dictated by the goals of protecting both the individual and society as a whole. The author declares no conflicts of interests.","PeriodicalId":41435,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Pravo-Tomsk State University Journal of Law","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Pravo-Tomsk State University Journal of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/46/15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pandemic of the new coronavirus infection, which has been going on in the world for several years, is regarded as a global challenge to the existing structure of public life, the economy, and the state, having had a powerful destructive impact on all spheres of people's lives. Assessing the pandemic as a total threat in the world of work, the International Labour Organization (hereinafter - the ILO) in one of its reports stressed that policy responses should primarily be aimed at solving such tasks as protecting workers, employers, and their family members from the threat posed by a new coronavirus infection, establishing and strengthening protection measures. from it, as well as support for employment and income, stimulating the economy and demand for labor. Among the main state responses in the field of social protection of the ILO are access to medical care, social security in connection with illness (temporary disability benefits), protection from unemployment, social protection of elderly citizens and families with children, the establishment of temporary social benefits for socially vulnerable categories of citizens, benefits in the field of taxes and contributions for social insurance, ensuring the prompt and correct operation of the mechanism for providing social security. In an attempt to counter the multiple and extensive negative effects of the pandemic, today often referred to as a coronacrisis in general, to protect the population from such, States have taken various measures, and often radical ones. The researchers note that the most common areas of work of states around the world have become support for national health systems, support for living conditions and incomes of the population, state lending to business, tax measures for the population and business. It seems that in the conditions of a pandemic, any functions performed by the State ultimately lead to consequences inherent in the social function. And such a transformation of the functions of the state today is more in line with the public demand. Stimulating, supporting or limiting steps that have been taken in various countries of the world in order to counteract the consequences of the pandemic and protect the population and business from such, have received an ambiguous and sometimes contradictory assessment of citizens. It should be noted at the same time that in the current situation, threatening danger even with elementary social interactions, restrictive measures were approved by citizens: the latter were not always against the establishment of a ban on movement, social contacts, etc. The experience of the pandemic has shown that the intervention of public authorities in the spheres of public relations, in which their active participation previously caused contradictions and was limited in order to provide participants with freedom of expression, is now a necessity and is mainly approved by society.: This is characteristic of both the sphere of civil turnover (rental relations, issues of accrual of sanctions for late fulfillment of obligations), and the sphere of labor relations (issues of dismissal of an employee, remuneration). In the field of social security, the existing conditions have provoked a new round of discussion about the availability, guarantee of social security, and mechanisms for exercising the right to it in changing stressful circumstances. The above points to the transformation of the role of the state under the influence of emergency conditions: in such a person expects to meet in the person of the state not an indifferent observer or business partner, but sometimes an assistant and a guarantor of security, including physical. The content of the social function in the conditions under consideration, in addition to the provision of rights, opportunities, benefits, acquires an element of limitation, the establishment of a framework. At the same time, this restriction is dictated by the goals of protecting both the individual and society as a whole. The author declares no conflicts of interests.
在大流行病影响下国家职能的转变
新型冠状病毒感染疫情已在全球蔓延数年,被视为对现有公共生活、经济和国家结构的全球性挑战,对人们生活的各个领域都产生了强大的破坏性影响。国际劳工组织(以下简称“劳工组织”)在一份报告中评估了新冠肺炎大流行对劳动世界的全面威胁,强调政策应对措施应主要着眼于解决保护工人、雇主及其家庭成员免受新型冠状病毒感染威胁、建立和加强保护措施等任务。从它,以及支持就业和收入,刺激经济和劳动力的需求。国家在劳工组织社会保护领域的主要对策包括:获得医疗服务、与疾病有关的社会保障(临时残疾津贴)、失业保护、老年公民和有子女家庭的社会保护、为社会弱势类别的公民设立临时社会福利、税收和社会保险缴款方面的福利。确保社会保障机制及时正确运行。这一大流行病今天通常被称为冠状病毒危机,各国采取了各种措施,往往是激进的措施,试图应对其多重和广泛的负面影响,以保护民众免受这种影响。研究人员指出,世界各国最常见的工作领域是支持国家卫生系统,支持人口的生活条件和收入,国家对企业的贷款,对人口和企业的税收措施。看来,在大流行病的情况下,国家履行的任何职能最终都会导致社会职能所固有的后果。而今天国家职能的这种转变更符合公众的要求。世界各国采取了刺激、支持或限制措施,以抵消这一流行病的后果,并保护民众和企业免受其害,但对公民的评价却模棱两可,有时甚至相互矛盾。同时应当指出的是,在目前的情况下,即使是在基本的社会交往中也有危险,限制措施得到了公民的批准:公民并不总是反对禁止行动、社会接触等。这一流行病的经验表明,公共当局在公共关系领域的干预,以前它们的积极参与引起矛盾,而且为了向参与者提供言论自由而受到限制,现在是必要的,并且主要得到社会的认可。这是民事流动领域(租赁关系、延迟履行义务的惩罚问题)和劳动关系领域(解雇雇员、报酬问题)的特点。在社会保障领域,现有条件引发了关于社会保障的可得性、保障以及在不断变化的压力环境中行使社会保障权利的机制的新一轮讨论。上述情况表明,在紧急情况的影响下,国家的作用发生了转变:在这种情况下,人们期望在国家身上见到的不是一个漠不关心的观察者或商业伙伴,有时是一个助手和安全的保证人,包括人身安全。社会职能的内容在考虑条件下,除了提供权利、机会、福利外,还获得了限制因素,建立了框架。同时,这种限制是出于保护个人和整个社会的目标。作者声明没有利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信