Evaluation of Urine Dipstick For Leukocyte Esterase Test For Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection

Shaima’a R. Al-Salihy
{"title":"Evaluation of Urine Dipstick For Leukocyte Esterase Test For Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection","authors":"Shaima’a R. Al-Salihy","doi":"10.26505/djm.18014830721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:General urine examination (GUE) and urine culture are the most requested tests by clinicians for patients with symptoms suggestive of urinary tract infections (UTI). However, they are laborious methods. So dipstick probably become rapid diagnostic alternative. Objective: To determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of dipstick for leukocyte esterase (LE) test compared with gold standard urine culture for diagnosis of UTI. Patients and Methods: A total of 150 mid-stream urine samples were collected from adult patient with clinically diagnosed or suspected UTI, during the period from 1 st September to 1 st December, 2018. Urine culture, general urine examination (GUE) and dipstick for LE were performed for each sample. Results: In the 150 urine samples, 126 (84%) were culture positive, and the prevalence of UTI among female (84.13%) was significantly higher than the prevalence among males (15.87%). Approximately, half of urine culture grew E.coli 70 (46.67%) followed by Klebsiella spp. 55 (36.67%), and Staphylococcus aureus 1(0.67%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of dipstick for LE test were 86.5%, 87.5%, 97.3% and 55.25%, respectively. However, the values can be enhanced by combination with GUE. Conclusion: Both general urine examination (GUE) and dipstick for leukocyte esterase (LE) methods are with predictive value in diagnosis of UTI. Because urine culture is an expensive and delayed test, rapid test could be a good substitution to reduce the workload and a good screening method.","PeriodicalId":11442,"journal":{"name":"Dwight's Journal of Music","volume":"30 1","pages":"70-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dwight's Journal of Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26505/djm.18014830721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:General urine examination (GUE) and urine culture are the most requested tests by clinicians for patients with symptoms suggestive of urinary tract infections (UTI). However, they are laborious methods. So dipstick probably become rapid diagnostic alternative. Objective: To determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of dipstick for leukocyte esterase (LE) test compared with gold standard urine culture for diagnosis of UTI. Patients and Methods: A total of 150 mid-stream urine samples were collected from adult patient with clinically diagnosed or suspected UTI, during the period from 1 st September to 1 st December, 2018. Urine culture, general urine examination (GUE) and dipstick for LE were performed for each sample. Results: In the 150 urine samples, 126 (84%) were culture positive, and the prevalence of UTI among female (84.13%) was significantly higher than the prevalence among males (15.87%). Approximately, half of urine culture grew E.coli 70 (46.67%) followed by Klebsiella spp. 55 (36.67%), and Staphylococcus aureus 1(0.67%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of dipstick for LE test were 86.5%, 87.5%, 97.3% and 55.25%, respectively. However, the values can be enhanced by combination with GUE. Conclusion: Both general urine examination (GUE) and dipstick for leukocyte esterase (LE) methods are with predictive value in diagnosis of UTI. Because urine culture is an expensive and delayed test, rapid test could be a good substitution to reduce the workload and a good screening method.
白细胞酯酶检测尿试纸对尿路感染诊断价值的评价
背景:尿常规检查(GUE)和尿培养是临床医生对提示尿路感染(UTI)症状的患者要求最多的检查。然而,它们是费力的方法。所以试纸可能会成为快速诊断的替代品。目的:比较白细胞酯酶(LE)试验试纸与金标准尿培养诊断尿路感染的敏感性、特异性及阳性、阴性预测值。患者与方法:于2018年9月1日至12月1日收集临床诊断或疑似尿路感染的成人患者中游尿液样本150份。每个样本进行尿培养、尿常规检查(GUE)和LE试纸。结果:150份尿样中培养阳性126份(84%),女性尿路感染患病率(84.13%)明显高于男性(15.87%)。大约一半的尿液培养物生长大肠杆菌70(46.67%),其次是克雷伯氏菌55(36.67%)和金黄色葡萄球菌1(0.67%)。试纸检测LE的敏感性为86.5%,特异性为87.5%,阳性预测值为97.3%,阴性预测值为55.25%。然而,通过与GUE结合,这些值可以得到增强。结论:尿常规检查(GUE)和白细胞酯酶试纸法(LE)对尿路感染的诊断均有一定的预测价值。由于尿液培养是一种昂贵且延迟的检测方法,快速检测可以作为一种很好的替代方法来减少工作量和一种很好的筛查方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信