Kognitif Füzyon Prostat Biyopsisinde Deneyim Kanser Tespit Oranını Etkiliyor Mu? İlk ve Son 60 Vakanın Karşılaştırılması

Q4 Medicine
O. Akyüz, Haydar Kamil Cam
{"title":"Kognitif Füzyon Prostat Biyopsisinde Deneyim Kanser Tespit Oranını Etkiliyor Mu? İlk ve Son 60 Vakanın Karşılaştırılması","authors":"O. Akyüz, Haydar Kamil Cam","doi":"10.47493/abantmedj.996342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We aimed to determine the contribution of the clinical experience gained in cognitive fusion prostate biopsy with the increase in the number of cases to the cancer detection rate.\nMaterials and Methods: The records of 120 patients who underwent cognitive fusion biopsy were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent 3-T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (Mp-MRI) and they were evaluated with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS). The initial 60 cases were included in group 1, and the later subsequent 60 cases performed by the same surgeon were included in group 2. Any cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPrCa) detection rates in groups 1 and 2 were compared.\nResults: The mean ages of the patients for group 1 and group 2 were determined as 64.08 ± 8.15 and 65.15 ± 6.93 years, respectively. Age, prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate volumes and the number of suspicious lesions of the groups were similar. Any cancer positivity rate was 33.3% for group 1, and 40% for group 2, without any significant intergroup difference (p=0.494). CSPrCa positivity was 40% and 70.83% for groups 1 and 2, respectively, and there was a significant improvement in CSPrCa detection in favor of group 2 (p=0.027).\nConclusion: Regarding the cognitive fusion biopsies, a learning curve is required. It was concluded that the rate of detecting clinically significant prostate cancer was almost doubled with the increased experience in fusion biopsy.\nKeywords: Biopsy, Cognitive Fusion, Learning Curve, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Prostate Cancer","PeriodicalId":53622,"journal":{"name":"Duzce Medical Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Duzce Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47493/abantmedj.996342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to determine the contribution of the clinical experience gained in cognitive fusion prostate biopsy with the increase in the number of cases to the cancer detection rate. Materials and Methods: The records of 120 patients who underwent cognitive fusion biopsy were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent 3-T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (Mp-MRI) and they were evaluated with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS). The initial 60 cases were included in group 1, and the later subsequent 60 cases performed by the same surgeon were included in group 2. Any cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPrCa) detection rates in groups 1 and 2 were compared. Results: The mean ages of the patients for group 1 and group 2 were determined as 64.08 ± 8.15 and 65.15 ± 6.93 years, respectively. Age, prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate volumes and the number of suspicious lesions of the groups were similar. Any cancer positivity rate was 33.3% for group 1, and 40% for group 2, without any significant intergroup difference (p=0.494). CSPrCa positivity was 40% and 70.83% for groups 1 and 2, respectively, and there was a significant improvement in CSPrCa detection in favor of group 2 (p=0.027). Conclusion: Regarding the cognitive fusion biopsies, a learning curve is required. It was concluded that the rate of detecting clinically significant prostate cancer was almost doubled with the increased experience in fusion biopsy. Keywords: Biopsy, Cognitive Fusion, Learning Curve, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Prostate Cancer
目的:我们旨在确定随着病例数的增加,认知融合前列腺活检所获得的临床经验对癌症检出率的贡献。材料与方法:回顾性分析120例行认知融合活检的患者的记录。所有患者均行3-T多参数磁共振成像(Mp-MRI)检查,并使用前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PIRADS)进行评估。最初的60例被纳入第1组,随后由同一位外科医生手术的60例被纳入第2组。比较1、2组任意癌及临床显著性前列腺癌(CSPrCa)检出率。结果:组1、组2患者平均年龄分别为64.08±8.15、65.15±6.93岁。两组年龄、前列腺特异抗原(PSA)、前列腺体积、可疑病变数相似。1组肿瘤阳性率为33.3%,2组为40%,组间差异无统计学意义(p=0.494)。1组和2组CSPrCa阳性率分别为40%和70.83%,且2组CSPrCa阳性率明显提高(p=0.027)。结论:对于认知融合活检,需要一个学习曲线。结论是,随着融合活检经验的增加,临床显著前列腺癌的检出率几乎增加了一倍。关键词:活检,认知融合,学习曲线,磁共振成像,前列腺癌
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Duzce Medical Journal
Duzce Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信