Prognostic value of preoperative albumin to globulin ratio in patients treated with salvage radical prostatectomy for radiation recurrent prostate cancer.

Q1 Medicine
F. Quhal, B. Pradère, R. Sari Motlagh, K. Mori, E. Laukhtina, A. Aydh, H. Mostafaei, I. Lysenko, V. Schuettfort, F. Stolzenbach, C. Palumbo, A. Heidenreich, A. Briganti, P. Karakiewicz, P. Chłosta, S. Shariat
{"title":"Prognostic value of preoperative albumin to globulin ratio in patients treated with salvage radical prostatectomy for radiation recurrent prostate cancer.","authors":"F. Quhal, B. Pradère, R. Sari Motlagh, K. Mori, E. Laukhtina, A. Aydh, H. Mostafaei, I. Lysenko, V. Schuettfort, F. Stolzenbach, C. Palumbo, A. Heidenreich, A. Briganti, P. Karakiewicz, P. Chłosta, S. Shariat","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03938-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nSerum albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) has been shown to be associated with poor prognosis in different malignancies. In this study we aimed to evaluate the predictive value of preoperative AGR for oncological outcomes in patients with radiation recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) treated with salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP).\n\n\nMETHODS\nA retrospective review of 214 consecutive patients with radiation-recurrent PCa who underwent SRP at five referral centers. Levels of albumin and globulin were obtained before SRP and used to calculate the preoperative AGR level. The optimal cut off value of preoperative AGR was 1.4. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOverall 89 (41.6%) patients had a low preoperative AGR. Low serum AGR was associated with biochemical recurrence (BCR) in univariable Cox regression analysis (HR 1.60, 95%CI 1.06-2.43, P=0.026). When adjusted for the effects of established preoperative and postoperative clinicopathologic confounders in different multivariable Cox regression models, this association did not retain its statistical significance. Moreover, preoperative AGR was not associated with metastasis free survival (P= 0.21), overall survival (P= 0.91) or cancer specific survival (P=0.61).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nIn patients with radiation recurrent PCa undergoing SRP, low preoperative AGR was associated with the risk of BCR only in univariable analysis. There was no association with metastasis or survival outcomes. Further studies are needed to evaluate this biomarker in the setting of primary PCa and to identify the patients most likely to benefit from a local therapy.","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03938-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

BACKGROUND Serum albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) has been shown to be associated with poor prognosis in different malignancies. In this study we aimed to evaluate the predictive value of preoperative AGR for oncological outcomes in patients with radiation recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) treated with salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP). METHODS A retrospective review of 214 consecutive patients with radiation-recurrent PCa who underwent SRP at five referral centers. Levels of albumin and globulin were obtained before SRP and used to calculate the preoperative AGR level. The optimal cut off value of preoperative AGR was 1.4. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed. RESULTS Overall 89 (41.6%) patients had a low preoperative AGR. Low serum AGR was associated with biochemical recurrence (BCR) in univariable Cox regression analysis (HR 1.60, 95%CI 1.06-2.43, P=0.026). When adjusted for the effects of established preoperative and postoperative clinicopathologic confounders in different multivariable Cox regression models, this association did not retain its statistical significance. Moreover, preoperative AGR was not associated with metastasis free survival (P= 0.21), overall survival (P= 0.91) or cancer specific survival (P=0.61). CONCLUSIONS In patients with radiation recurrent PCa undergoing SRP, low preoperative AGR was associated with the risk of BCR only in univariable analysis. There was no association with metastasis or survival outcomes. Further studies are needed to evaluate this biomarker in the setting of primary PCa and to identify the patients most likely to benefit from a local therapy.
术前白蛋白/球蛋白比值对放疗复发前列腺癌行补救性根治性前列腺切除术的预后价值。
背景:血清白蛋白与球蛋白比率(AGR)已被证明与不同恶性肿瘤的不良预后相关。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估术前AGR对放射复发性前列腺癌(PCa)患者接受补救性根治性前列腺切除术(SRP)治疗的肿瘤预后的预测价值。方法回顾性分析在5个转诊中心接受SRP治疗的214例放射复发性PCa患者。在SRP前获得白蛋白和球蛋白水平,并用于计算术前AGR水平。术前AGR最佳临界值为1.4。进行单变量和多变量Cox回归分析。结果89例(41.6%)患者术前AGR较低。单变量Cox回归分析显示,低血清AGR与生化复发(BCR)相关(HR 1.60, 95%CI 1.06 ~ 2.43, P=0.026)。当在不同的多变量Cox回归模型中调整术前和术后临床病理混杂因素的影响时,这种关联没有保持其统计学意义。此外,术前AGR与无转移生存(P= 0.21)、总生存(P= 0.91)或癌症特异性生存(P=0.61)无关。结论放疗复发性前列腺癌行SRP的患者,术前低AGR仅与BCR风险相关。与转移或生存结果无关联。需要进一步的研究来评估原发性前列腺癌背景下的生物标志物,并确定最有可能从局部治疗中获益的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica publishes scientific papers on nephrology and urology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of Minerva opinion editorials, editorial comments, original articles, video illustrated articles, review articles and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信