Independent Researchers: A Bibliometric Analysis

Pub Date : 2023-08-06 DOI:10.5530/jscires.12.2.026
Brady Lund, Amrollah Shamsi, Arezoo Ghamgosar, N. Vasantha Raju, Hossein Dehdarirad, Mohammad Javad Mansourzadeh
{"title":"Independent Researchers: A Bibliometric Analysis","authors":"Brady Lund, Amrollah Shamsi, Arezoo Ghamgosar, N. Vasantha Raju, Hossein Dehdarirad, Mohammad Javad Mansourzadeh","doi":"10.5530/jscires.12.2.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Independent Researchers (IRs), namely unaffiliated or voluntary researchers, are a small yet important and distinct population of contributors to scholarly discourse. Due to their small number, IRs rarely receive attention in debates regarding scholarly publishing but the distinctiveness of the unaffiliated researchers warrants further examination. Documents were extracted from the Web of Science. Bibliometric parameters were as follows: main scientometric characteristics, citations analysis, publishing trends, geographical distributions, most productive countries, co-authorship network of countries, top funding sources, research areas, keyword co-occurrence network, top cited publications, top productive journals and gender of IRs. 3357 documents were retrieved that were individually or collaboratively authored by 3784 IRs from 1980-2021. There were 589 single-authored documents. More than 70% of documents were research articles, followed by meeting abstracts (8.66%). All documents received 52279 citations, with 19.45 average citations per document. Private Practice was the most affiliation format of IRs. Publications started to grow since 2000, with almost 40% of them published from 2017-2021. The United States published almost half of all IRs-related publications. Most of the research funding was primarily contributed by government agencies, with the United States being a major player in this regard. Also, many IRs are active in medical disciplines research, and are highly collaborative, often with multiple Co-authors. 33.5% of IRs authors were women and 66.5% were men. This understanding of IRs illustrates the importance of this group and encourages further research and support for this population of science contributors.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.12.2.026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Independent Researchers (IRs), namely unaffiliated or voluntary researchers, are a small yet important and distinct population of contributors to scholarly discourse. Due to their small number, IRs rarely receive attention in debates regarding scholarly publishing but the distinctiveness of the unaffiliated researchers warrants further examination. Documents were extracted from the Web of Science. Bibliometric parameters were as follows: main scientometric characteristics, citations analysis, publishing trends, geographical distributions, most productive countries, co-authorship network of countries, top funding sources, research areas, keyword co-occurrence network, top cited publications, top productive journals and gender of IRs. 3357 documents were retrieved that were individually or collaboratively authored by 3784 IRs from 1980-2021. There were 589 single-authored documents. More than 70% of documents were research articles, followed by meeting abstracts (8.66%). All documents received 52279 citations, with 19.45 average citations per document. Private Practice was the most affiliation format of IRs. Publications started to grow since 2000, with almost 40% of them published from 2017-2021. The United States published almost half of all IRs-related publications. Most of the research funding was primarily contributed by government agencies, with the United States being a major player in this regard. Also, many IRs are active in medical disciplines research, and are highly collaborative, often with multiple Co-authors. 33.5% of IRs authors were women and 66.5% were men. This understanding of IRs illustrates the importance of this group and encourages further research and support for this population of science contributors.
分享
查看原文
独立研究者:文献计量学分析
独立研究人员(IRs),即无党派或自愿的研究人员,是一个小而重要且独特的学术话语贡献者群体。由于其数量较少,IRs很少在学术出版的辩论中受到关注,但非附属研究人员的独特性值得进一步研究。文件摘自科学网。文献计量参数包括:主要科学计量特征、引文分析、出版趋势、地理分布、最高产国家、各国合著网络、主要资助来源、研究领域、关键词共现网络、最常被引出版物、最高产期刊和ir性别。共检索到3784位IRs在1980-2021年间单独或合作撰写的3357篇文献。有589个单独撰写的文档。超过70%的文献为研究论文,其次是会议摘要(8.66%)。所有文献被引用52279次,平均被引用19.45次。私人执业是最具隶属关系的注册会计师形式。自2000年以来,出版物开始增长,其中近40%的出版物是在2017-2021年出版的。美国出版了几乎所有国税局相关出版物的一半。大部分研究经费主要由政府机构提供,美国是这方面的主要参与者。此外,许多ir活跃于医学学科研究,并且具有高度的协作性,通常有多个共同作者。33.5%的ir作者为女性,66.5%为男性。对ir的理解说明了这一群体的重要性,并鼓励对这一科学贡献者群体进行进一步的研究和支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信