Employment support for Black people with long-term health conditions: a systematic narrative review of UK studies.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-10 DOI:10.1080/09638237.2023.2182410
Celestin Okoroji, Yasmin Ibison, Dan Robotham
{"title":"Employment support for Black people with long-term health conditions: a systematic narrative review of UK studies.","authors":"Celestin Okoroji, Yasmin Ibison, Dan Robotham","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2023.2182410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Black people in the United Kingdom disproportionately acquire long-term health conditions and are marginalised from the labour market compared with other groups. These conditions interact and reinforce high rates of unemployment among Black people with long-term health conditions.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine the efficacy, and experience, of employment support interventions in meeting the needs of Black service users in Britain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted focusing on peer-reviewed literature featuring samples drawn from the United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search revealed a paucity of articles that include analysis of Black people's outcomes or experiences. Six articles met the selection criteria of the review, of which five focused on mental health impairments. No firm conclusions could be drawn from the systematic review; however, the evidence suggests that Black people are less likely than their White counterparts to secure competitive employment and that Individual Placement and Support (IPS) may be less effective for Black participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We argue for a greater focus on ethnic differences in employment support outcomes with an emphasis on how such services may remediate racial differences in employment outcomes. We conclude by foregrounding how structural racism may explain the dearth of empirical evidence in this review.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"274-281"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2023.2182410","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Black people in the United Kingdom disproportionately acquire long-term health conditions and are marginalised from the labour market compared with other groups. These conditions interact and reinforce high rates of unemployment among Black people with long-term health conditions.

Aims: To examine the efficacy, and experience, of employment support interventions in meeting the needs of Black service users in Britain.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted focusing on peer-reviewed literature featuring samples drawn from the United Kingdom.

Results: The literature search revealed a paucity of articles that include analysis of Black people's outcomes or experiences. Six articles met the selection criteria of the review, of which five focused on mental health impairments. No firm conclusions could be drawn from the systematic review; however, the evidence suggests that Black people are less likely than their White counterparts to secure competitive employment and that Individual Placement and Support (IPS) may be less effective for Black participants.

Conclusions: We argue for a greater focus on ethnic differences in employment support outcomes with an emphasis on how such services may remediate racial differences in employment outcomes. We conclude by foregrounding how structural racism may explain the dearth of empirical evidence in this review.

为有长期健康问题的黑人提供就业支持:英国研究的系统性叙事回顾。
背景:与其他群体相比,英国的黑人过多地患有长期疾病,并被劳动力市场边缘化。这些情况相互作用,加剧了有长期健康问题的黑人的高失业率。目的:研究就业支持干预措施在满足英国黑人服务使用者需求方面的效果和经验:方法:进行了系统的文献检索,重点是以英国为样本的同行评审文献:结果:文献检索结果显示,对黑人的结果或经历进行分析的文章很少。有六篇文章符合审查的选择标准,其中五篇侧重于心理健康障碍。从系统性综述中无法得出确切的结论;但是,有证据表明,黑人比白人更不可能获得有竞争力的就业,而且个人安置和支持(IPS)对黑人参与者可能不太有效:结论:我们认为,应更加关注就业支持结果中的种族差异,重点关注此类服务可如何弥补就业结果中的种族差异。最后,我们强调了结构性种族主义如何解释本综述中缺乏实证证据的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mental Health
Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信