Investigating the Effects of Integration on the Development of Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching: A Case of Pre-Service Teachers in the Colleges of Education in Ghana amidst Curriculum Changes

Bliss Cornelius Sedega
{"title":"Investigating the Effects of Integration on the Development of Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching: A Case of Pre-Service Teachers in the Colleges of Education in Ghana amidst Curriculum Changes","authors":"Bliss Cornelius Sedega","doi":"10.24940/ijird/2023/v12/i1/jan23009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study examined the effects of integration on the development of Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching (MKT) among pre-service teachers while enrolled in a math program at the colleges of education in Ghana in the face of the new curriculum. In all, two hundred and forty-seven (247) pre-service teachers (PSTs) were sampled for the study. The experimental group comprised one hundred and thirty (130) PSTs who were taught both Mathematics content and method courses in an integrated manner, while the control group, comprised of one hundred and seventeen (117) PSTs, was taught Mathematics content and method courses separately. The non-equivalent static-group comparison design was used for the study. Both groups of PSTs were post-tested after they had received instruction in mathematics courses up to the point where they were ready to go for their macro teaching (Off Campus Teaching Practice) to compare their achievements in terms of their mathematical knowledge for teaching. Analysis of data using the independent sample t-test revealed that the control group had a mean score lower than the experimental group, and the standard deviation showed that the scores of the control group were far from their mean score. That is, the scores of the control group were more heterogeneous than that of the experimental group. The experimental group scored higher than the control group on the post-test, and their scores were more homogeneous than the control group. At a significant level of 0.05, there was a statistically significant difference between the means of the two groups on the post-test. With a mean difference of 5.042, the experimental group performed better than the control group on the post-test. Hence, the students in the experimental group turned out to achieve better on MKT components than the students in the control group. It was recommended, among others, that the use of the integrated approach in the teaching and learning of Mathematics should be encouraged, monitored, and supported throughout the Colleges of Education in Ghana.","PeriodicalId":14101,"journal":{"name":"International journal of innovative research and development","volume":"289 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of innovative research and development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24940/ijird/2023/v12/i1/jan23009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study examined the effects of integration on the development of Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching (MKT) among pre-service teachers while enrolled in a math program at the colleges of education in Ghana in the face of the new curriculum. In all, two hundred and forty-seven (247) pre-service teachers (PSTs) were sampled for the study. The experimental group comprised one hundred and thirty (130) PSTs who were taught both Mathematics content and method courses in an integrated manner, while the control group, comprised of one hundred and seventeen (117) PSTs, was taught Mathematics content and method courses separately. The non-equivalent static-group comparison design was used for the study. Both groups of PSTs were post-tested after they had received instruction in mathematics courses up to the point where they were ready to go for their macro teaching (Off Campus Teaching Practice) to compare their achievements in terms of their mathematical knowledge for teaching. Analysis of data using the independent sample t-test revealed that the control group had a mean score lower than the experimental group, and the standard deviation showed that the scores of the control group were far from their mean score. That is, the scores of the control group were more heterogeneous than that of the experimental group. The experimental group scored higher than the control group on the post-test, and their scores were more homogeneous than the control group. At a significant level of 0.05, there was a statistically significant difference between the means of the two groups on the post-test. With a mean difference of 5.042, the experimental group performed better than the control group on the post-test. Hence, the students in the experimental group turned out to achieve better on MKT components than the students in the control group. It was recommended, among others, that the use of the integrated approach in the teaching and learning of Mathematics should be encouraged, monitored, and supported throughout the Colleges of Education in Ghana.
整合对数学教学知识发展的影响研究——以课程改革中的加纳教育学院职前教师为例
本研究考察了面对新课程,在加纳教育学院参加数学课程的职前教师中,整合对数学教学知识(MKT)发展的影响。总共有247名职前教师(pst)参与了这项研究。实验组由130名pst组成,以综合方式教授数学内容和方法课程;对照组由117名pst组成,分别教授数学内容和方法课程。本研究采用非等效静态组比较设计。两组pst在接受数学课程指导直至准备进行宏观教学(校外教学实践)时都进行了后测,以比较他们在教学数学知识方面的成就。使用独立样本t检验对数据进行分析,发现对照组的平均得分低于实验组,标准差表明对照组的得分与他们的平均得分相差甚远。也就是说,对照组的分数比实验组的分数具有更大的异质性。实验组的后测得分高于对照组,且得分较对照组均一。在0.05的显著水平上,两组后测均数差异有统计学意义。实验组的后测成绩优于对照组,平均差值为5.042。因此,实验组学生在MKT组件上的表现优于对照组学生。除其他外,还建议在加纳的所有教育学院鼓励、监测和支持在数学教学中使用综合方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信